Arian Foster Let It Be Known That He Is A Non-Believer

Studies performed at the HeartMath Institute show that each human heart emits an electromagnetic field, the largest generated by any part of the human body, which extends up to several feet away from the body in a 360-degree radius. An individual’s heart communicates with the hearts of others in its immediate vicinity through the emotional information encoded in its electromagnetic field and throughout the world via the electromagnetic pulses associated with each heartbeat which travel at the speed of sound.

Our heart sends out organized patterns of energy and this has been shown to directly affect the functioning of other organs and organisms outside the heart...The heart, like a radar tower, continually scans for communications and information. When it hits other biological oscillators and their accompanying electromagnetic fields, as with all fields that come in contact with each other, the heart experiences alterations in its own electromagnetic spectrum. The way the field is altered conveys information. When two or more fields synchronize, information is conveyed. The way these oscillating fields of energy patterns meet and perturb one another and experienced in human beings is unique.

One’s heart also communicates with one’s brain (via the nervous system, hormones, pulse waves, and electromagnetic fields) and with the brains of other individuals (via pulse waves and electromagnetic fields), according to McCraty, Tiller, & Atkinson (1996). The brain emits its own electromagnetic field and waves of energy (known as alpha, beta, delta, gamma, and theta waves, each of which results from different states in brain functioning). The heart’s electrical field, however, is almost 60 times greater in amplitude than that of the brain and is more than 5000 times greater in strength than the brain’s electrical field (McCraty, Tiller, & Atkinson, 1996). The heart also sends more information to the brain than the brain sends to the heart.

Also supporting the hypothesis that magnetic fields are carriers of biologically relevant information is a recent study that demonstrated epigenetic information related to DNA could be detected as electromagnetic signals in a highly diluted solution and this information can be transferred to and imprinted in pure water that has never been exposed to DNA, but only in the presence of a 7.8-hertz weak magnetic field. Furthermore, this information can lead to the re-creation of DNA when the appropriate basic constituents of DNA are present – but again, only if extremely low electromagnetic frequency fields of 7.8 hertz are present to carry the information.

“A fundamental conclusion of the new physics also acknowledges that the observer creates the reality. As observers, we are personally involved with the creation of our own reality. Physicists are being forced to admit that the universe is a “mental” construction. Pioneering physicist Sir James Jeans wrote: “The stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter. Get over it, and accept the inarguable conclusion. The universe is immaterial-mental and spiritual” – (R. C. Henry, “The Mental Universe”; Nature 436:29, 2005, Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Johns Hopkins University)

Scientific research is based on the assumption that all events, including the actions of mankind, are determined by the laws of nature. Therefore, a research scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by a prayer, that is, by a wish addressed to a supernatural Being. However, we have to admit that our actual knowledge of these laws is only an incomplete piece of work (unvollkommenes Stückwerk), so that ultimately the belief in the existence of fundamental all-embracing laws also rests on a sort of faith. All the same, this faith has been largely justified by the success of science.
On the other hand, however, every one who is seriously engaged in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that the laws of nature manifest the existence of a spirit vastly superior to that of men, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. The pursuit of science leads therefore to a religious feeling of a special kind, which differs essentially from the religiosity of more naive people. -Albert Einstein


Clearly no one in here is receptive to the discussion, I see that now. Dismissing religion is not the great intellectual leap that you all seem to think it is. If finding fallacy in fairytales is more your speed I completely understand. I'll excuse myself while you guys continue the circle jerk.
 
Last edited:
Science and religion do share a common thing to me imo.

Look at certain scientific theories.....the time and universe infinite theory...the multi worlds theory that stephen hawking bellieves in.....the multi dimensions theory.....and look at religion with the afterlife.

All of those things are similar in that they offer a kind of "hope" of something greater than the lives we live.

Its scary as **** to think that when you die it will be the same as if b4 u were born....just nothing......but i think you have to at least recognize the fact that its possible. You live and you die and thats it.

And Theres nothing really wrong with that.

I mean in the large scheme of the universe we basically hit the ******* universe lottery.

The ability to imagine....to laugh...dream....love...experience. ..to understand things on a higher level....even if for 80 or 90 years....thats roughly 30 sum thousand days that you get a chance to live. Some people or things aren't so lucky.

People get so cought up in believing in this and that and trying to understand why and i understand its our nature but NOW is the most important thing.
 
Hawking has no evidence b.

Multi worlds is a philosophy.


But i agree yea thats a difference but all i was saying is what those both offer their respective believers
 
Last edited:
Im not arguing about religion vs science blood but like i said way earlier let people believe wat they want is it really productive to bash watever a person thinks, theyre most likely not gonna change their mind.


There is a scientific explanation for emotions like love



Do u think like this
 
Last edited:
"Let them think what they want", sure, but there's a limit to that. In the middle east they can think what they want....... and if an American female goes there not fully covered they get acid thrown at their face. "Think what they want"...... If your kid thinks 2+2 is 9 do you let him think what he wants?

People pull this statement out of its own boundaries. Opinion on a movie? Favorite color? Sure, think what you want. Decisions on other peoples lives, discrimination, hate, NO, don't think what you want.
 
Last edited:
Science and religion do share a common thing to me imo.

Look at certain scientific theories.....the time and universe infinite theory...the multi worlds theory that stephen hawking bellieves in.....the multi dimensions theory.....and look at religion with the afterlife.

All of those things are similar in that they offer a kind of "hope" of something greater than the lives we live.

Its scary as **** to think that when you die it will be the same as if b4 u were born....just nothing......but i think you have to at least recognize the fact that its possible. You live and you die and thats it.

And Theres nothing really wrong with that.

I mean in the large scheme of the universe we basically hit the ******* universe lottery.

The ability to imagine....to laugh...dream....love...experience. ..to understand things on a higher level....even if for 80 or 90 years....thats roughly 30 sum thousand days that you get a chance to live. Some people or things aren't so lucky.

People get so cought up in believing in this and that and trying to understand why and i understand its our nature but NOW is the most important thing.[/B
]


View media item 1480051
 
"Let them think what they want", sure, but there's a limit to that. In the middle east they can think what they want....... and if an American female goes there not fully covered they get acid thrown at their face. "Think what they want"...... If your kid thinks 2+2 is 9 do you let him think what he wants?

People pull this statement out of its own boundaries. Opinion on a movie? Favorite color? Sure, think what you want. Decisions on other peoples lives, discrimination, hate, NO, don't think what you want.

i agree there are limits.

But at the same time look at all the deaths caused by religious persecution.

You believe what u want...fine...thats cool....ill believe what i want...okay.

No one has to die for it.

But it aint like that.

Theres good and bad.
 
I see the mood finally turned in here lol.

Condescending and insulting tones on both sides. In the end we are all fertilizer
 
Nobody gave up on God just as nobody gave up God doesn't exists

At certain point, nobody is listening. He tried to take it to I don't know part
 
I see you quoted Einstein saying "The pursuit of science leads therefore to a religious feeling of a special kind" but skipped the last part where he mentioned "the religiosity of more naive people."

OOOOOH, you think you subscribe to that SPECIAL kind of religion. Go you. :smokin

Trying to talk to people about ego, though. :lol:

Hearts communicating with brains, electromagnetic fields, DNA codes... nothing about evidence of a supreme being or substantiating the fairy tales you claim is sophomoric to dismiss, though.

View media item 1677531
 
Last edited:
What I find funny are seeing a lot of the religious dudes in here are scumbags in other threads.

I be like Bruh ain't u pitches defending God. But u here being a whack human?
 
[quote name="LIONBLOOD"]This thread isn't even about God anymore, dudes gave up on that and are now posting pseudoscience and science fiction.[/quote]"Prove The Unproven Existence exists before including her in the discussion of possible origins of life."

"Prove it doesn't exist."

"Prove The Unproven Existence exists before including her in the discussion of possible origins of life."

"We don't know everything. Could be possible. You don't know.

"Prove The Unproven Existence exists before including her in the discussion of possible origins of life."

"Oh, I thought this was discussion at the level of intelligence *I'VE* arrived at. My bad. Believe what your infantile minds wish."

"Prove The Unproven Existence exists before including her in the discussion of possible origins of life."

"Einstein supported religion. Faith is part of science. Einstein said so."

:rofl: :lol: :lol:

Knowing too much to learn, learning too much to refrain from judgment; STAPLES of religiosity.
 
 
Thoughts?
‪#‎testimony‬ God is so good. A lady at my church was telling me about how she was in the house one day, years ago, and she was about to go to Landover Mall. Out of nowhere, a male voice said to her, "Don't go to Landover Mall." She was taken aback for a moment, so she put some clothes in the washer, did some chores, then wrote it off and decided to go to the mall.

Once again, the male voice told her clear as day, "Don't go to Landover Mall." She listened. Later, she turned on the news and a lady was killed in the Parking Lot of Landover mall around the same time she would have been there. My Lord, it could have been her. AMAZING how God looks out for His children. He preserves, He protects, and He Saves. Won't you come?
god works in mysterious ways

http://shanghaiist.com/2015/08/18/c...ulls-knife-on-prostitute-cleanse-her-sins.php
 
I see the mood finally turned in here lol.

Condescending and insulting tones on both sides. In the end we are all fertilizer



What if that's all there is to it.


Would that be so bad?


All I want is to be buried among my family when I'm dead.


My kids live on, their kids (if they have any) live on, so forth and so on.


A little part of you lives on.



Would any theists here be okay with that?



What if......What if you removed the concept of Heaven and only had hell for sinners. And simply nothingness, simply the end of your existence for being good?


Or even remove hell, what if religion was incentive free.


God created man, and that's it. Be good, do good, you reap what you sow, and these religious texts were just lessons on how to be righteous?


What if there was no reward or punishment. Just dirt and earth in your end. Your only incentive is creating a better life for your kids, or just simply your fellow human?



Would you even bother?






.
 
Last edited:
EXCEPT religion tends to cause mass psychosis. They don't call it t the opiate of the masses for no reason.



I still don't get why he keeps pulling that card.


Like, nobody on this page was even talking about religious fundamentalism or anything of that nature and he wants to go bring up Dahmer and throw all atheists in a pile together.


Like Friendly, who was that even in response to. Me? What I said?
 
his urge to kill people was not because he was an atheist

he was just a sick twisted individual 



Exactly bruh.



It's not like the Crusades or Muslim fundamentalists.


Or Bush waging war because God "spoke to him".



Atheists don't lop off people's heads or drop bombs on cities for jihad or crusades (Bush said and I quote "I believe this is a holy war", he used the word "crusade" multiple times).



We're not out there bombing the Gaza strip either.



FOH with that nonsense.



Aware me the atheist version of a crusade, or of jihad, or zionism.



.
 
Last edited:
Yes and the guy in your article was totally sane :rolleyes

They both were pyschos and used excuses for their behavior
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom