The NBA Draft Thread

From what I've heard about Monk it sounds like there are some pretty big risks of taking him at #3, if he ends up being a one-note kind of player.
What does he do if he isn't shooting well? He's probably the best fit for Philly, but he's definitely a little one-dimensional.

Ball seems like an odd fit in Philly... Two primary ball handlers in Simmons and Ball that don't create for themselves all that well doesn't sound ideal.
 
Last edited:
What does he do if he isn't shooting well? He's probably the best fit for Philly, but he's definitely a little one-dimensional.

Ball seems like an odd fit in Philly... Two primary ball handlers in Simmons and Ball that don't create for themselves all that well doesn't sound ideal.
If I get the next Jamal Crawford at #3 and I'm a rebuilding team that needs starters (Philly) I'm probably not happy with that tbh.

Regarding Ball, I agree (and they need shooting), but I think they also just want to take the most talent and figure it out from there.
 
From what I've heard about Monk it sounds like there are some pretty big risks of taking him at #3, if he ends up being a one-note kind of player.
What does he do if he isn't shooting well? He's probably the best fit for Philly, but he's definitely a little one-dimensional.

Ball seems like an odd fit in Philly... Two primary ball handlers in Simmons and Ball that don't create for themselves all that well doesn't sound ideal.

You can run the majority of the half court offense through Embiid. Simmons and Embiid could run a lot of 4/5 pick and roll.

Lonzo can push the ball when he rebounds, spot up in the half court. I've always liked Lonzo in Philly
 
You can run the majority of the half court offense through Embiid. Simmons and Embiid could run a lot of 4/5 pick and roll.

Lonzo can push the ball when he rebounds, spot up in the half court. I've always liked Lonzo in Philly

Ball in Philly makes the most sense out of any team in the top 5. I honestly don't understand how people can't see that Ball is not a lead guard.

You don't want him pounding the air out of the ball and being your main facilitator. He's someone who excels within the flow of the game, especially when the pace is pushed and he has weapons around him. Let him and Simmons do a little of what Draymond does and he'll cook.
 
Last edited:
You can run the majority of the half court offense through Embiid. Simmons and Embiid could run a lot of 4/5 pick and roll.

Lonzo can push the ball when he rebounds, spot up in the half court. I've always liked Lonzo in Philly

Would a pick and roll between two players who are zero threat to shoot even work? I gotta imagine every single team would go under that screen and not even try to fight through it.
 
You can run the majority of the half court offense through Embiid. Simmons and Embiid could run a lot of 4/5 pick and roll.

Lonzo can push the ball when he rebounds, spot up in the half court. I've always liked Lonzo in Philly

Would a pick and roll between two players who are zero threat to shoot even work? I gotta imagine every single team would go under that screen and not even try to fight through it.

Embiid shot 37% from 3 last year, though a lot of them were trailing threes. But he's got the capability to space the floor.

Atlanta ran a lot of 4/5 PNR with josh smith and al horford. Miami ran it with neck tat and whiteside. That 4/5 PNR is hard to defend cause teams aren't used to seeing it. Australian Rondo should thrive cause if you switch, your 4 man isn't going to be able to check Embiid on the block.
 
Embiid shot 37% from 3 last year, though a lot of them were trailing threes. But he's got the capability to space the floor.

Atlanta ran a lot of 4/5 PNR with josh smith and al horford. Miami ran it with neck tat and whiteside. That 4/5 PNR is hard to defend cause teams aren't used to seeing it. Australian Rondo should thrive cause if you switch, your 4 man isn't going to be able to check Embiid on the block.
Ill be honest I had only caught 2 Embiid games this season and he didnt shoot a 3 in either games.  Didnt even know the dude had it in him.  Good for him.
 
their fans talking him down being drafted at 2
but let him fall to 3, " perfect compliment to simmons" blah blah blah 

I can't speak for other Sixers fans but I love the talent, I just would like to see the turmoil Lavar could cause with him there in LA :lol:

Lonzo, Simmons and Dario would be a ridiculous passing team. But even though I like him some of his red flags are undeniable and it would have me nervous about taking him.

Embiid is really ******* good at shooting for those that have barely seen him play.
 
Last edited:
Would a 18/19 year old Crawford, Lou Will, JR average 20ppg at a top ranked school like Kentucky? Absolutely not.

I wouldnt use a top 5 pick on him but I could definitely see him being better than all those guys. If Jason Terry can be the 2nd option on a championship team i can't see why Monk can't be a 2nd or 3rd option on one.
 
Would a 18/19 year old Crawford, Lou Will, JR average 20ppg at a top ranked school like Kentucky? Absolutely not.

I wouldnt use a top 5 pick on him but I could definitely see him being better than all those guys. If Jason Terry can be the 2nd option on a championship team i can't see why Monk can't be a 2nd or 3rd option on one.
Those types of players tend to be way more valuable as vets once they figure out their roles and get their heads on straight, than they are to their first teams though.
 
Would a 18/19 year old Crawford, Lou Will, JR average 20ppg at a top ranked school like Kentucky? Absolutely not.

I wouldnt use a top 5 pick on him but I could definitely see him being better than all those guys. If Jason Terry can be the 2nd option on a championship team i can't see why Monk can't be a 2nd or 3rd option on one.

Yes, they absolutely would be a 20ppg scorer at Kentucky at 19 years old if they needed to :lol:
 
Would a 18/19 year old Crawford, Lou Will, JR average 20ppg at a top ranked school like Kentucky? Absolutely not.

I wouldnt use a top 5 pick on him but I could definitely see him being better than all those guys. If Jason Terry can be the 2nd option on a championship team i can't see why Monk can't be a 2nd or 3rd option on one.
Wait. You don't think any of those guys could've averaged 20 as a primary option as a freshman?
 
How does Anunoby fall to 22 but Kennard jumps to 13th? Likelier that both of them fall out of the lotto but I'm reaching for Anunoby before Luke or even Justin Jackson
 
Under Cal they could, under Tubby Smith or Billy Gillespie I don't think so.

I believe Crawford averaged 17ppg as a frosh at UM

Not sure Lou Williams could, dude had no left and lacked a jumper when he broke into the league. Glad he was able to create a role for himself after all these years, but college might have helped his game.

JR Smith likely could have, he's been good since his rookie year.
 
How does Anunoby fall to 22 but Kennard jumps to 13th? Likelier that both of them fall out of the lotto but I'm reaching for Anunoby before Luke or even Justin Jackson
Yeah I'd take Anunoby before Kennard or Jackson. That kid is built like a damn tank. If he develops a good mid to long range jumper he could be really good.

Justin Jackson will be a career bench player.
 
Back
Top Bottom