- 85,462
- 111,533
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
A sizeable difference in body type, and being a one legged vs two legged leapers, but Malik Monk = Jason Richardson?
The NBA Draft Thread
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by pmatic,
- Start date
- 31,856
- 26,150
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
i see what you are getting at but
is everyone aware that monk is only 6'3. yall know that right?
short arms as well.
Last edited:
- 85,462
- 111,533
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
THAT WAS MY FIRST DISCLAIMER!
Moheezy
formerly mizzoe33
- 10,890
- 8,770
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
Lakers win, Kings lose, and Philly has the potential to trade Jah for a first rounder. If we can have as many as three 2017 lottery picks :x
Hinkie will be proud.
Hinkie will be proud.
- 85,462
- 111,533
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
It's a 2018 draft pick that is rumored, not 2017.
- 85,462
- 111,533
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
Ford published a new mock draft: http://www.espn.com/nba/insider/sto...ock-draft-30-picks-lakers-celtics-sixers-more
Not going to post the write ups, but here's the lottery:
1. Celtics - Fultz
2. Lakers - Ball
3. Suns - Jackson
4. 76ers - Monk
5. Magic - Smith Jr.
6. Pelicans - Issac
7. Kings - Tatum
8. T'Wolves - Markkanen
9. Mavs - Ntilikina
10. Heat - Giles
11. Knicks - Fox
12. Nuggets - Miles
13. Bucks - Patton
14. Pistons - Ferguson
Not going to post the write ups, but here's the lottery:
1. Celtics - Fultz
2. Lakers - Ball
3. Suns - Jackson
4. 76ers - Monk
5. Magic - Smith Jr.
6. Pelicans - Issac
7. Kings - Tatum
8. T'Wolves - Markkanen
9. Mavs - Ntilikina
10. Heat - Giles
11. Knicks - Fox
12. Nuggets - Miles
13. Bucks - Patton
14. Pistons - Ferguson
- 38,407
- 7,519
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2008
Giles @ 10?
Don't think so.
Don't think so.
Last edited:
- 85,462
- 111,533
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
Dat Duke-Miami connection.
- 78,995
- 53,662
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2012
I really think Lakers need a Junkyard Dog
Someone who is going to mix it up and defend
If they have the #2 choice, if I assess and believe Jackson can play the 2 or project and try to put Ingram at the 2, I'm leaning Jackson
Someone who is going to mix it up and defend
If they have the #2 choice, if I assess and believe Jackson can play the 2 or project and try to put Ingram at the 2, I'm leaning Jackson
Last edited:
- 85,462
- 111,533
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
It would be nice to have someone athletic in the line up that can go downhill.
- 78,995
- 53,662
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2012
I also think LA needs a player who can stir the drink. Right now they have solid young pieces but they need someone who's going to make everything go and shift into the next gear
I don't know if it's Jackson but as talented and versatile as Ball is I fear that he may be repetitive for them. IDK, I'm just splitting hairs here perhaps
I don't know if it's Jackson but as talented and versatile as Ball is I fear that he may be repetitive for them. IDK, I'm just splitting hairs here perhaps
- 69,989
- 111,073
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
Both of those guys would be good fits.
- 38,407
- 7,519
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2008
I don't see Ball as a good pick for the Lakers, he's not as versatile as Fultz would be and is only going to be effective as the primary ballhandler.
If I'm Lakers at number 2 I'm taking Jackson no hesitation.
If I'm Lakers at number 2 I'm taking Jackson no hesitation.
Last edited:
- 78,995
- 53,662
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2012
I feel like they need someone different, someone who will add another/different dimension
Ball kind of offers them more of the same
And we can even debate BPA, Jackson may have the edge anyway
Ball kind of offers them more of the same
And we can even debate BPA, Jackson may have the edge anyway
Last edited:
- 31,856
- 26,150
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
Malik Monks not in my top 8.
- 9,831
- 3,228
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
Monk's gotta be top 10 even if its #10, just not enough non guard prospects worth anything
- 31,856
- 26,150
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
Right now I would say
1. Fultz.
2. Ball
3. Dennis Smith
4. Josh Jackson
5. Lauri Markenen
6. Johnathan Issac
7. Dareon Fox.
8. Tatum and Monk.
1. Fultz.
2. Ball
3. Dennis Smith
4. Josh Jackson
5. Lauri Markenen
6. Johnathan Issac
7. Dareon Fox.
8. Tatum and Monk.
Last edited:
- 78,995
- 53,662
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2012
Yeah, not unfair at all
- 33,817
- 25,385
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
Exact way I have it also.
If I'm the Lakers, Josh Jackson is #1 on my draft board. Fox falling to the Knicks is a damn pipe dream
If I'm the Lakers, Josh Jackson is #1 on my draft board. Fox falling to the Knicks is a damn pipe dream
Last edited:
Moheezy
formerly mizzoe33
- 10,890
- 8,770
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
No way Giles goes before Miles and Fox. I can also see Tatum falling between 8 and 10.
As for the Lakers, they either draft Jackson or trade the pick for a star if it falls #2. That may even be a good opportunity to get rid of Deng or Moz's contract. It's also hard to imagine Smith falling to #5. But it all depends on who lands where in the lottery.
The standings change every week, its nuts.
As for the Lakers, they either draft Jackson or trade the pick for a star if it falls #2. That may even be a good opportunity to get rid of Deng or Moz's contract. It's also hard to imagine Smith falling to #5. But it all depends on who lands where in the lottery.
The standings change every week, its nuts.
- 147
- 87
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2015
Why not post the write ups?
- 85,462
- 111,533
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
I don't want to get warned or have this thread locked. OKB and myself got warned last year.
- 69,989
- 111,073
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
Who was the dude that kept asking OKB to post articles every day before last year's draft?
Last edited:
- 31,856
- 26,150
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
Who was the dude that kept asking OKB to post articles every day before last year's draft?
His thirstiness is what brought on the warnings.
and whats worse he asking for ******** articles like lunardi's bracketology.
- 85,462
- 111,533
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
Similar threads
