does clinton survive Rwandan genocide if twitter was around?

7,165
1,812
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Looking back at it dudes woulda banned together and demanded an impeachment .
Twitter was calling for Goodell head for not seeing the Ray rice footage , ain't nobody believing clinton ain't know bout 900k murders (even if true).
Black lives matter woulda been besides themselves .
 
Its interesting now that I think about it. I don't know enough about the situation to say either way.
 
I dont think there would have been an impeachment.

And your comparing the NFL to international issues..
 
Would the president of the united states, during one of it's most prosperous times since it's inception, be impeached because of the rwandan genocide? Is that the question you're asking?
 
The general public in America doesn't usually care too much about warfare and conflicts in other nations if we're not involved or white people aren't being killed. Look at Yemen, Syria, and Libya. Beyond "terrorists are killing people," a lot of Americans don't know that there were ethnically-focused mass killings there.

They're literally doing an ethnic cleanse in the Dominican Republic right now... How outraged are the people you know? http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ans-fleeing-dominican-republic-stuck-in-camps
 
Last edited:
This thread is weird.  A lot of things would have obviously had different outcomes or played out differently had social media been around during those times the way it is now.  In all honesty though the majority of the clowns really ready to ride via social media have NO idea what they are supporting or think they are supporting.  It's a lot deeper than throwing up a hashtag and retweeting your favorite celebrities on the issue. 
indifferent.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom