LC: sz.12 Jordan XI Cherry low 2012 retro

Afternoon gentleman. I'll get straight to it. In 2012, I purchased XI Cherry lows from FootLocker for retail. I dawg walked the shoes so I recently purchased a VNDS pair from a VERY reputable place to replace them. The VNDS pair came in yesterday. As usual with any shoe I purchase, I looked them over. Since I got my legit beat up pair, I did comparison's. Only problem for me is the Jumpman on the back. What do y'all think?

P.S. They came with no box. And if y'all need more pics, just let me know what y'all wanna see and I'll post them.

^New pair at the top, old pair at the bottom.

^Old pair

^Old pair in the back, new pair in the front.

^Here's my concern. Old pair on the left,new pair on the right. On the new pair, Jordan's feet nearly touches the patent leather. On the old pair, it's more distance. On the old pair, he's a bit more "thicker" as well.

^Old on the left, new on the right.

^New on the left, old on the right...

^New pair

^Old pair

^New pair. The "P" in "INSPIRED" is slightly incomplete and looks like an "F"

The problem with low 11s is that the quality on them is worse than the mediocre usual.

All those little defects you found, might just be normal. I'd wait for more opinoins...

you're good bro....just a flare, but legit. jumpman shape is correct just on the old shoe possibly "Blown out" due to rain wear/moisture. and the quality tag you want to look for loose threads or wrinkles( it should be sewn flush with no wrinkles). looks good to me, thats assuming you already checked everything else?