|| LocK Dis Up ||

How Many Games Do You Project The Lakers Will Win This Season?

  • 15-20

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 21-25

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 26-30

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 31-35

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 36-40

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 41-45

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 46-50

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 51-55

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 56-73

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • They Will Break the NBA Record with 74+ Wins

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Knew he wasn't coming here because of the GM control, but the fact that he wanted to come is disappointing.
 
Once it was he wanted the "SVG control," I lost a lot of interest.. Even if I believed (and still do) that he was the best guy for the job.


It's too many hats to wear.
 
Should the Lakers fire Scott, many had mentioned Thibodeau as a potential target, but according to Eric Pincus of the LA Times, Thibodeau crossed the Lakers off his list a while ago because he wants more power than is available in Los Angeles:
Eric Pincus [emoji]10004[/emoji] ‎@EricPincus
My understanding is Lakers were crossed off as an option some time ago because no bball ops power available
2:26 PM - 18 Apr 2016


But if he is/was interested, as well as brooks, I'm gonna take that as a good sign
 
Byron for another year would be a profound indictment of our dysfunctional management . Truly amazing that good coaches are being snatched up left and right while we are leaning towards retaining the losing-est coach of all time

Amazing
 
Byron for another year would be a profound indictment of our dysfunctional management . Truly amazing that good coaches are being snatched up left and right while we are leaning towards retaining the losing-est coach of all time

Amazing

Thibs was the only good coach hired so far.
 
Seriously tho, Luke is the most obvious choice and he still has a job right now. You also have bud in atl. I don't mind waiting for a coach that's actually in the playoffs if that's what it comes down to. I also don't mind passing on giving full control to thibs or saying no to Brooks.

Really, really curious to see what kind of offense Brooks brings to DC. People say KD/Russ are just ISO guys ignoring that Brooks coached them from the beginning of their careers and had the chance to mold their game. I would hate it if dlo/Randle/JC ended up that way, we already have boron for that.
 
Last edited:
David Blatt, the guy who was too afraid of offending his best player and wouldn't point out that player's mistakes? That David Blatt?
 
David Blatt is a good coach.

Don't be fooled by LeSnake and his antics. No ones ever been a good enough coach for him.
 
Last edited:
Blatt sounded full of himself after all the leaks. But perhaps that was just a smear campaign to justify the firing. Or not.
 
Nobody is comparing pick #3, a pick that automatically holds value, to pick 46 which has none to limited value, hence putting you in a forced position to make a selection. Unless someone is willing to cough up cash.

All anyone is saying is this-you want a quick turnaround, you can get established talent with some of the young core+FAs while sacraficing that #3 in a package...i never implied only #3 and JC would net jimmy butler. I suggested a package centered around that in a s&t, making the salaries match. Honest question...would the assumed salary of #3 based on slot factor in salaries? Or is it just assumed as the draft rights to someone, not assuming the team and player would agree to a deal??
 
Nobody is comparing pick #3, a pick that automatically holds value, to pick 46 which has none to limited value, hence putting you in a forced position to make a selection. Unless someone is willing to cough up cash.

All anyone is saying is this-you want a quick turnaround, you can get established talent with some of the young core+FAs while sacraficing that #3 in a package...i never implied only #3 and JC would net jimmy butler. I suggested a package centered around that in a s&t, making the salaries match. Honest question...would the assumed salary of #3 based on slot factor in salaries? Or is it just assumed as the draft rights to someone, not assuming the team and player would agree to a deal??
They have zero value until they sign a contract.
 
Thanks.

So itd have to be a s&t for jc@max+another of the core or multiple core members+#3. Not likely to happen...but something to mull.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom