akajae
formerly akajaedeuce
- 18,616
- 27,125
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2005
|| LocK Dis Up ||
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by licensed to ball,
- Start date
- Status
- 44,144
- 65,442
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2001
She's so full of **** man 
akajae
formerly akajaedeuce
- 18,616
- 27,125
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2005
Here is the accuser covering Swaggy and Farmar in college.
disgusting
these dudes are my same year...
my HS didn't stand a chance
still ELCO tho!
- 36,045
- 12,024
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
the first thing the college coach said about this clown is "he's very good at taking recruits out"
only basketball related comment was "he's talented"
I hate everything about nick young, he is a waste of human life
only basketball related comment was "he's talented"
I hate everything about nick young, he is a waste of human life
comptonprince
Banned
- 8,744
- 2,221
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2014
the first thing the college coach said about this clown is "he's very good at taking recruits out"
only basketball related comment was "he's talented"
I hate everything about nick young, he is a waste of human life
- 79,218
- 109,697
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
Here is the accuser covering Swaggy and Farmar in college.
Yikes I'm starting to think this broad was probably following them.
- 835
- 375
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2012
Last edited:
- 37,610
- 37,487
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
she a bopHere is the accuser covering Swaggy and Farmar in college.
Yikes
I'm starting to think this broad was probably following them.
someone probably hit n quit it on her
- 41,739
- 175,131
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2013
- 36,649
- 37,692
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
This game is ugly...
- 11,008
- 11,865
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2012
Here is the accuser covering Swaggy and Farmar in college.
Damn I can't believe this *****
- 36,100
- 10,945
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2008
Simmons & Ingram are clearly consensus 1 & 2.
And even though it's a HUGE drop off, # 3 is kind of interesting.
Brown, Dunn, Bender, Poeltl, Hield all have some claim to # 3 pick.
-Brown has most potential. Also fits defensively. BUT, can't shoot a lick, so he with Bender would require most work, but has a higher floor than Bender.
-Dunn fits well in a guard rotation. Solid on defense, but also a lot of upside because of side. But he's older, so that puts questions on his ceiling
-Bender is really really raw. Has good potential , but isn't some mythical being that if he gets it, will blow the doors off like Porzingis got from some circles.
-Poeltl is the best defender of these guys. Would fit, but wouldn't say his ceiling is super high. Fringe starter maybe.
-Hield is probably the easy # 3 pick if he wasn't turning 23 in December. Great great shooter. But he's bad on defense, and is a bit undersized as a 2. Also out of all these guys, he's the only one that would require shuffling of any of Russell, Clarkson & Randle to a new team (Clarkson in this case). Now way it could work, or even attempt to work it like you could try with Simmons & Randle in a variant lineup of different generations.
No thanks to Ellenson & Murray
And even though it's a HUGE drop off, # 3 is kind of interesting.
Brown, Dunn, Bender, Poeltl, Hield all have some claim to # 3 pick.
-Brown has most potential. Also fits defensively. BUT, can't shoot a lick, so he with Bender would require most work, but has a higher floor than Bender.
-Dunn fits well in a guard rotation. Solid on defense, but also a lot of upside because of side. But he's older, so that puts questions on his ceiling
-Bender is really really raw. Has good potential , but isn't some mythical being that if he gets it, will blow the doors off like Porzingis got from some circles.
-Poeltl is the best defender of these guys. Would fit, but wouldn't say his ceiling is super high. Fringe starter maybe.
-Hield is probably the easy # 3 pick if he wasn't turning 23 in December. Great great shooter. But he's bad on defense, and is a bit undersized as a 2. Also out of all these guys, he's the only one that would require shuffling of any of Russell, Clarkson & Randle to a new team (Clarkson in this case). Now way it could work, or even attempt to work it like you could try with Simmons & Randle in a variant lineup of different generations.
No thanks to Ellenson & Murray
Last edited:
- 21,963
- 23,888
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2010
^given the drop off at #3, is there any scenario if we end up at #3 we trade it to move back and get an asset (player or more picks) in return?
MVP
Supporter
- 81,659
- 82,445
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
I doubt we'd be able to get multiple picks for #3, usually that's when a draft has some type of depth going in. If it's traded it'll be for a current player.
- 37,610
- 37,487
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
- 23,933
- 5,933
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2005
Reported
- 36,100
- 10,945
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2008
Thought about going back to with Nuggets to get # 8 (currently) and either 15 or 17 (currently) for # 3.
But with the lack of depth in the draft it's super risky.
Would rather them just draft at 3, if they are keeping the pick
darthska
Staff member
- 43,713
- 27,262
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
#3 for a former Wildcat on the Kings.
Who says no?
Who says no?
- 21,784
- 2,957
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2007
Me, reluctantly.
- 21,963
- 23,888
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2010
- 36,045
- 12,024
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
how bout dem suns
VinMillerHearn58
formerly lakersreppa008
- 15,092
- 3,577
- Joined
- May 5, 2006
Suns 
darthska
Staff member
- 43,713
- 27,262
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
That's what I was looking for.
- 36,100
- 10,945
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2008
- 36,045
- 12,024
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
booker is legit
kobe putting on a show in a L
kobe putting on a show in a L
- Status