Study: Men Who Catcall Overcompensate For Their Small Balls...

7,134
1,150
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Dr. Jacob C. Dunn and his team of researchers published the results of their study titled "Evolutionary Trade-Off between Vocal Tract and Testes Dimensions in Howler Monkeys" where they found that, when it comes to reproduction, these primates can only have either a bigger and deeper voice for mating calls or bigger balls for a more abundant supply of sperm. Another thing: the males with smaller balls tend to stay silent until they sense a female and go all out with their ruckus. Does that sound familiar to anyone?

Article

Seems like a reach to me, but i immediately thought of that vid of the chick walking around in NY

:nerd:
 
Last edited:
Testicles, doe? Who even cares about such?

I'd take the article more serious if they said they were over compensating for a lack of confidence.

Idk, Its never even crossed my mind to "catcall".
 
When I think of "cat callin" I think of yelling and whistling from across the street, not a legitimite attempt to strike up a conversation.
 
Holdup I definitely misread the article....I skimmed thru this morning naw...I thought they were saying guys that catcalls have larger balls no romo...I was saying I think that's true for the fact they have more confidence....this one of dem emasculation articles
 
I never do it. It seems like motivation to make a girl walk faster.

How else u gonna talk to girls then

I mean just a simple hi how you doing or something like that is wrong?

Uhh... That's not cat calling, b.

Cat calling is "YO BAABBYYY, I GOT A GARAGE FOR YOU TO PARK THAT CABOOSE, YEAH GIRL YOU KNOW YOU LIKE IT"

What you listed is the normal way to approach anyone.
 
I hope these studies dont cost money to research cus they dumb af.
This why mankind aint advancing. Stay worryin bout deez nuts.
 
i doubt most men even know what the average ball size is, let alone care about the size of their oysters 
 
I hope these studies dont cost money to research cus they dumb af.
This why mankind aint advancing. Stay worryin bout deez nuts.
On the surface it looks like this survey was dumb af; however you really have to dig deep, think critically and apply it to the questions we want answered. Let me explain.

For decades, women and feminine men alike have said that men who buy big trucks are overcompensating for their size. On it's own that's a harmless claim. 

....But look at how those big trucks are advertised. We associate trucks with the deep manly voiceovers in commercials advertising construction or farming. Why is the voice always deep and manly?

Surely they could be successful advertising with some hot country girls in daisy dukes and flannel right?

Wrong.

It's because the automotive industry been woke up to the facts that these researchers uncovered. Deep manly voices are relatable to people w/ small balls. This is a big money implication because men's car buying preferences have always been an extension of primitive mating rituals. Now we look to the monkeys and have substantiated the claim that deep voices is the best way to market to people with small balls. Thats an implication worth potentially billions of dollars.
 
Back
Top Bottom