Study: Men Who Catcall Overcompensate For Their Small Balls...

On the surface it looks like this survey was dumb af; however you really have to dig deep, think critically and apply it to the questions we want answered. Let me explain.

For decades, women and feminine men alike have said that men who buy big trucks are overcompensating for their size. On it's own that's a harmless claim. 
....But look at how those big trucks are advertised. We associate trucks with the deep manly voiceovers in commercials advertising construction or farming. Why is the voice always deep and manly?
Surely they could be successful advertising with some hot country girls in daisy dukes and flannel right?
Wrong.
It's because the automotive industry been woke up to the facts that these researchers uncovered. Deep manly voices are relatable to people w/ small balls. This is a big money implication because men's car buying preferences have always been an extension of primitive mating rituals. Now we look to the monkeys and have substantiated the claim that deep voices is the best way to market to people with small balls. Thats an implication worth potentially billions of dollars.

:rofl:
 
Small balls and not small penis?

I didn't know men cared about the size of their balls like that or females for that matter.

There's the metaphorical bragging about big balls but I never took that as literal thing where ppl wanted it.

Lucky for me i dont have sex with my balls, but with my ****. so the fight continues. 
Nah man, you gotta get in on that putting the whole package in the pum pum word to that one vid :nerd:
 
When I think of "cat callin" I think of yelling and whistling from across the street, not a legitimite attempt to strike up a conversation.


It's all lumped together now.


Basically any unwanted communication from a male is catcalling, street harassment etc.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom