2015-2016 NBA Regular Season - MDA to HOU - All-NBA - Harden snubbed - Anthony Davis is broke

Status
Not open for further replies.
I said the same thing last night. The same thing happened to DeAndre Jordan last night during the Hawks vs Clips game and they reviewed it. They didn't even bother to review in the Spurs vs Rockets. When I asked last night the best response someone posted was that Houston was down by 30 and the other game was a 3 point affair at the time. So who knows.

Yeah i'm confused on that. Hopefully the cats on Inside the NBA go over this. Interested to see what they say about it. I KNOW Shaq bout to be hella pissed though :lol:
 
Man, ****** is getting fouled out of bounds now 
laugh.gif


There's gotta be an alteration of the rule coming this summer. This **** is really getting ridiculous now. This isn't basketball, This ain't strategy, this is that smart *** in class who read page 2458, so he knows the trick that's under the common answer that everyone else got

I mean, really?

cc: @Hot Route
 
 
but his goal is getting one for the land. we all know this

 if he wants to do that he needs more help.
Meh, whether he does or he doesn't, that's not the point.

The point is that the Cavs are not better than the Spurs, Warriors, or even Thunder tbh. I legit don't get how you know they shouldn't win, but **** on them when that actual conclusion comes into play.

I'm starting to feel very strongly that the Raps are the best team out east anyway, and I predicted that the cavs wouldn't make it out this season. 
 
I don't have time to watch this video right now but curious to know what is the rule on this? This should not be legal.

There's nothing in the rule book that says it's NOT legal, which is the key.

Here's the dumbest part: it's not even a delay of game. You ever notice in late game situations a ref tell a player to back off the inbounder in order to give him room to throw it in? If you don't back off, it's a delay of game. You know what ISN'T a delay of game? Literally going out of bounds and fouling the inbounder. Wait, it gets even dumber: if Capela had just dropped the ball (literally, let the ball fall to the ground), THAT would have been a delay of game too, because an intentional act by the defender would have prevented Capela from inbounding the ball. But actually fouling the guy is fair game. Tell me if that makes sense lol.
 
Man, ****** is getting fouled out of bounds now :lol:

There's gotta be an alteration of the rule coming this summer. This **** is really getting ridiculous now. This isn't basketball, This ain't strategy, this is that smart *** in class who read page 2458, so he knows the trick that's under the common answer that everyone else got

I mean, really?

View media item 1887892

cc: @Hot Route


I'm just going to foul deandre during the off season if I see him so he can head to the line at the beginning of the season.
 
'Man you know it's all about getting one for the Land......it's too early for this'

ol hitting the snooze *** *****

f boy culture.
 
Yo, just wondering. If I put 500 against the Warriors in a regular season game and I win. How much would I potentially win?

*looks at Warriors schedule
 
 
Meh, whether he does or he doesn't, that's not the point.

The point is that the Cavs are not better than the Spurs, Warriors, or even Thunder tbh. I legit don't get how you know they shouldn't win, but **** on them when that actual conclusion comes into play.

I'm starting to feel very strongly that the Raps are the best team out east anyway, and I predicted that the cavs wouldn't make it out this season. 
its hard to trust any teams in the east that doesnt have lj to come out the east based off the past but i hope the raps do come out the east .  
 
Yo, just wondering. If I put 500 against the Warriors in a regular season game and I win. How much would I potentially win?

*looks at Warriors schedule
depends on the matchup 

assuming you mean ML
 
Last edited:
Yo, just wondering. If I put 500 against the Warriors in a regular season game and I win. How much would I potentially win?

*looks at Warriors schedule
Obviously, this completely depends on who they are playing.  Like for instance, last night, if you were to bet $500 against the Warriors and the Warriors actually lost, you would have won $7500 (Mavs were +1500).  If you were to have bet $500 on the Spurs to beat the Warriors on Monday and the Warriors actually lost, you would have won $925 (Spurs were +185).
 
Last edited:
Yo, just wondering. If I put 500 against the Warriors in a regular season game and I win. How much would I potentially win?

*looks at Warriors schedule


I'd put money on the thunder to win the chip. And just keep betting against them. If they do win it all. +1200 right now. When they do run into the Warriors i would bet big on the Warriors so you could come out with a profit.
 
 
its hard to trust any teams in the east that doesnt have lj to come out the east based off the past but i hope the raps do come out the east .  
Yeah but while Lebron is still very good, his lack of shooting will be their downfall in the east.

Toronto has a top 5 offense and top 10 defense league wide for a reason. They are legit, and eye test tells me they can not only compete, but defeat the Cavs.

For a person with such a high usage rate as lebron has, his shooting has to get to at least respectable or else they won't make it out. 
 
Sometimes i just zone out and think about how messed up the world is. Wars, famine, poverty, and lebron not having enough help. Sick sad world. :smh:
 
Lebron doesn't need more help. The Cavs are by far one the more talented teams in the NBA.


Edit:

Unless, of course, you're being sarcastic and just making fun of the things Lebron stans say. If that's the case, then yes, Lebron needs moar halp!
 
Last edited:
But to be better than the Warriors Lebrun needs more help
I know they do, and really I don't know who would actually help the cavs beat the warriors so it's a moot point. Anything short of like a KD or someone.

And that's what I don't understand. I know it's a running gag on here, the whole 'Lebron needs more help thing' but that roster isn't good enough to defeat the warriors, thunder, or spurs.

So why do we sarcastically say Lebron needs more help? To get a joke off 
laugh.gif
?

The reality is that while Lebron is still obviously great, he can't defeat all time great teams like the warriors and spurs because...it's a team game. It's more so, "The Cavaliers need more help" instead of "Lebron needs more help"

Where you could cut corners with Prime lebron with Chris Anderson, Shane Battier etc., won't fly because Lebron isn't prime lebron anymore so you can't get by with JR Smith throwing stinkers in the finals, or lebron not being able to shoot, or having to play Richard Jefferson real minutes. The Cavaliers as a team, aren't composed to win an NBA title.
 
Last edited:
Yo, just wondering. If I put 500 against the Warriors in a regular season game and I win. How much would I potentially win?

*looks at Warriors schedule

I'd put money on the thunder to win the chip. And just keep betting against them. If they do win it all. +1200 right now. When they do run into the Warriors i would bet big on the Warriors so you could come out with a profit.
I would 100% NOT recommend doing this.  Here is why (and I am assuming the Thunder would be the 3 seed, Warriors the 1, and I will estimate the odds):

Say you bet $100 on the Thunder at +1200.  Your total possible winnings would be $1200.  So the Thunder play, lets say the Rockets in the first round and would be big favorites (lets guess -300).  You bet $300 against the Thunder (which would only cover your original $100 bet), which loses.  Now your total possible winnings would be $1200 but you are down $300. 

Then they face the Spurs in round 2.  The Spurs would be favored, but not by a ton.  Lets just say they are -200 to beat the Thunder.  So this bet would need to be at least enough to cover the $300 you are down, plus a little more so you could actually win something.  So you bet $700 on the Spurs to win. The Thunder win the series, and you are now down $1000 with a potential to win $1200.

Then the Thunder play the Warriors in the WCF.  I would guess that the Warriors would be at the very least would be -300.  So now, you are down $1000, with the potential to win only $200 more than you are down.  You have a $1000 makeup, and if you want to "profit" You would have to bet $30,000 on the Warriors at -300 just to break even with the $1000 you are down. 

If the Thunder win, you are now down $31,000.  NOW you still have to have the Thunder win the Finals for you to even cash your original bet that yields only $1200.

Sorry bro, but you clearly did not think through your post, as it is one of the dumbest betting strategies I have ever heard.  I hope the guy didnt listen to you, as it would be a sure fire way of flushing a large sum of money down the toilet.
 
Last edited:
 
Stephen Curry on the Warriors playing Oklahoma City Thunder the day before the Super Bowl: "It'll be a good 48 hours - a win and a win."
A-friend might kill himself before the superbowl starts
Regular season man.....if KD an em' don't care, man I care none. Bring on June.

http://newsok.com/article/5475292

“We just gotta play with a little bit more passion,” Durant said. “…We play every single day, we practice every single day. The process can get boring. I hate to say that. But we have to stay with it.”

     -Kevin Durant
over or under 50 'f the warriors, this is the thunders year' from a-friend leading up to the game
Yall take the under FTW
 
over or under 50 'f the warriors, this is the thunders year' from a-friend leading up to the game
@a-friend

**** the warriors
pimp.gif
 
Strong Co-sign
pimp.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom