2015-2016 NBA Regular Season - MDA to HOU - All-NBA - Harden snubbed - Anthony Davis is broke

Status
Not open for further replies.
erupt107th said:
 
Draymond's averages in the 3 Games Steph has missed since last season

9.7 Points

6.3 Rebounds

3.3 Assists

32% Shooting

Blake Griffin's averages in the four games he's played without CP3 this year. (Not including the PHX game in which he was ejected in the 2nd quarter)

29 Points

9 Rebounds

6.8 Assists

52% Shooting

How can anyone think Blake is even close to Draymond's level? 

#franchise

#notevenclose
Click to expand...
I don't think I've been in this thread for a week.. people weren't seriously debating this.. I don't wanna bee leaf

Draymond is amazing at his role.. he is not a franchise player. He is not better than BG. He's having a fantastic season.. but he ain't doing that as the number 1 guy on a team that isn't GS
 
Last edited:
Carver said:
 
I don't think I've been in this thread for a week.. people weren't seriously debating this.. I don't wanna bee leaf

Draymond is amazing at his role.. he is not a franchise player. He is not better than BG.
Click to expand...
After every Warrior game, Freeze and company would come in and say "So, Blake>Dray still?"
 
Am I missing something here? Where is all of this narrative coming from? Over the last handful of pages, people are making posts insinuating that people were claiming that Draymond:

-could carry a team as the #1 option
-is the best PF in the league
-is a top 5 player

WTF is this? Are you guys just using a strawman to exaggerate your point? Is this being said tongue in cheek? I havent read every page of this thread but were there really people doing that?

Draymond is a damn good ball player. Great teammate. Complements Curry and the other starters perfectly....which is seeming to be held against him for some reason.

Just because the players around him allow him to reach his maximum potenial as a ball player does not take away from the fact that he DOES play at that level. Doesnt make him a top 5 player. Doesnt make him a #1 option. But who cares?

Draymond is a damn good player and every team in the league would love to have him.
 
Last edited:
Whoa.... Thats nuts. He's been around for a minute.Sad times breh
 
Last edited:
dland24 said:
-could carry a team as the #1 option
-is the best PF in the league
-is a top 5 player

 
Click to expand...
Actually, everything up there ^^^, is nothing that was said.

Nobody said any of that. 

Top 10- yea

Better than Blake- yea 

But nobody said top5 or Best PF or he could carry a team. If they did, I missed all of that.

For the record, I'm on the Dray >Blake train.
 
sea manup said:
Clippers would not be better off with dray
Warriors would not be better off with Blake
Click to expand...

Thank you. As a Warrior GM, I wouldnt trade Draymond for Blake straight up.....absolutely no shot. But if I am the GM of the Nets, if given the choice I am taking Blake.
 
dland24 said:
Am I missing something here? Where is all of this narrative coming from? Over the last handful of pages, people are making posts insinuating that people were claiming that Draymond:

-could carry a team as the #1 option
-is the best PF in the league
-is a top 5 player

WTF is this? Are you guys just using a strawman to exaggerate your point? Is this being said tongue in cheek? I havent read every page of this thread but were there really people doing that?

Draymond is a damn good ball player. Great teammate. Complements Curry and the other starters perfectly....which is seeming to be held against him for some reason.

Just because the players around him allow him to reach his maximum potenial as a ball player does not take away from the fact that he DOES play at that level. Doesnt make him a top 5 player. Doesnt make him a #1 option. But who cares?

Draymond is a damn good player and every team in the league would love to have him.
Click to expand...

Do NOT try to bring logic into a Warriors haters circle jerk. According to Internet basketball "experts", the Warriors are now basically trash after what happened tonight....even though half their team (including literally the best night in/night out player in the NBA) sat out.
 
I dvr'd the dubs game but then while i watched the laker game (which is my only real priority, and we won :smokin) I saw the score at the bottom and said f that shiiiii.


didn't watch. dray was exposed? damn. boys got mopped. what'd klay do? HB back yet?

who do they play next? Maybe dray will spaz next game? lol.
 
dland24 said:
Am I missing something here? Where is all of this narrative coming from? Over the last handful of pages, people are making posts insinuating that people were claiming that Draymond:

-could carry a team as the #1 option
-is the best PF in the league
-is a top 5 player

WTF is this? Are you guys just using a strawman to exaggerate your point? Is this being said tongue in cheek? I havent read every page of this thread but were there really people doing that?

Draymond is a damn good ball player. Great teammate. Complements Curry and the other starters perfectly....which is seeming to be held against him for some reason.

Just because the players around him allow him to reach his maximum potenial as a ball player does not take away from the fact that he DOES play at that level. Doesnt make him a top 5 player. Doesnt make him a #1 option. But who cares?

Draymond is a damn good player and every team in the league would love to have him.
Click to expand...
Abematic said:
Draymond > Blake

I've choosen my franchise player.
Click to expand...
KhalilMack52 said:
Not 1 Warriors fan has said or believes Dray is a "HOF Dude" 
laugh.gif
 
laugh.gif



I'd rather have Draymond Green over him though. We all know Dray isn't a mental ****** like Blake Griffin
Click to expand...
a-friend said:
A month ago I had a Blakes back.

Dray is better
Click to expand...
 
Um yes.....I do have more questions....the same questions. all my questions still apply because none of that nonsense you posted answered any of them.

So a bunch of people would rather have Draymond that Blake. Great. So do I. That doesnt prove people were saying he is a top 5 player, #1 option, etc. Try again.
 
Last edited:
dland24 said:
Um yes.....all my questions still apply because none of that nonsense you posted answered any of them.

So a bunch of people would rather have Draymond that Blake. Great. So do I. That doesnt prove people were saying he is a top 5 player, #1 option, etc. Try again.
Click to expand...

U know how van ho be reaching all the god damn time lol
 
dland24 said:
Um yes.....I do have more questions....the same questions. all my questions still apply because none of that nonsense you posted answered any of them.

So a bunch of people would rather have Draymond that Blake. Great. So do I. That doesnt prove people were saying he is a top 5 player, #1 option, etc. Try again.
Click to expand...
So you don't buy Blake as a true #1 option? Or the best PF?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom