2015-2016 NBA Regular Season - MDA to HOU - All-NBA - Harden snubbed - Anthony Davis is broke

Status
Not open for further replies.
agreed..... 

jordan main pippen sidekick 
kd main westbrook sidekick 
lebron main , kyrie sidekide 


very simple concept .dudes just like to play dumb and try to get cute with it. 

to be fair.

Shaq main, Kobe sidekick for those 3 rings.

Kobe DID not do it alone, contrary to popular belief.
 
Yup the same jump man antics at play here ...start some stuff then claim everybody attacking him :lol: :smh:

How is posting about a basketball player in a basketball forum starting anything? I was told shut up and called a dope. I never get personal. I always attack to topic not the person. When dude told me to "go kill myself" the other day you said nothing. When guys talk about other men's "meat" you say nothing. What's the problem with me talking about my team and calling folk out on what they've said pertaining to basketball?

You have a member who gets tons of laughs in this thread now who's been banned several times. Once for threatening to kill other members via PM. Yet he's still here but I should be banned? The double standards are amazing really. Never change NT.
 
Wall is gonna have a cp3 like career. He'sgonna have to be a 2nd option to win.
 
agreed..... 

jordan main pippen sidekick 
kd main westbrook sidekick 
lebron main , kyrie sidekide 


very simple concept .dudes just like to play dumb and try to get cute with it. 

to be fair.

Shaq main, Kobe sidekick for those 3 rings.

Kobe DID not do it alone, contrary to popular belief.

Kobe was a sidekick for 2 rings. That last one, they were equals or kobe was even a bit better.
 
Shaq and Kobe were never equals in any of those championship years either philosophically or tangibly.

Shaq>Kobe
 
Last edited:
2mq3v5i.jpg


nerd.gif
 
Alex Len is real [emoji]128064[/emoji]

Terps :pimp:

I like him too. Legit 7 footer with skills and solid, if not spectacular, athleticism.

My impression of him is part of what made the Suns deal for Chandler a bit puzzling to me. Glad Len has been playing well lately.
 
That graphic is approximately half through the playoffs and only takes scoring into account.

Shaq finished averaging with a higher scoring average on a higher shooting percentage while being better in every major statistically category besides assists.
 
That graphic is approximately half through the playoffs and only takes scoring into account.

Shaq finished averaging with a higher scoring average on a higher shooting percentage while being better in every major statistically category besides assists.
basically. 

Shaq was even better in 01. 29 & 13 and again finished top 3 in mvp voting
 
He is the 2nd option.

Bradley Beal leads the team in shots.
Are you srs?

A two to a real 1 ... Beal in no way shape or form better than wall right now and he certainly cannot carry a team. Let alone a n elite player.

Lmao your logics .. they are killing me.
 
Last edited:
Are you srs?

A two to a real 1 ... Beal in no way shape or form better than wall right now and he certainly cannot carry a team. Let alone a n elite player.

Lmao your logics .. they are killing me.

I don't think you can read.

1st option =/= best player
 
That graphic is approximately half through the playoffs and only takes scoring into account.

Shaq finished averaging with a higher scoring average on a higher shooting percentage while being better in every major statistically category besides assists.
shaq averaged 1 more point than kobe

kobe had a better ft%, steals, assists. basically all the stats a guard should have

while shaq's stats reflected that of a post player, better rebounds, blocks and fg%

kobe had better stats vs the two strongest teams they faced (kings and spurs) while shaq took advantage of the weaker matchups

kobe had better averages during road games while shaq was better at home

shaq had more turnovers

so please take your nonsense elsewhere, we need to start talking about john wall 
 
I don't think you can read.

1st option =/= best player
so why say Beal is first option? You know that's not true .. regardless of how much more he shoots and that further emphasize my statement about Wall not being an eliet or franchise.


Your statement about Wall being the number 2 options is hilarious. But yeah I can't comprehend. Is cool ....
 
so why say Beal is first option? You know that's not true .. regardless of how much more he shoots and that further emphasize my statement about Wall not being an eliet or franchise.


Your statement about Wall being the number 2 options is hilarious. But yeah I can't comprehend. Is cool ....
Because first option means FIRST OPTION ON OFFENSE. The offense is NOT designed for Wall to be the primary scorer. That is a fact.

All that other **** you're talking about  "elite or franchise" is null and void. And yeah...you can't comprehend...because in your mind best player = first option.
 
Last edited:
shaq averaged 1 more point than kobe

kobe had a better ft%, steals, assists. basically all the stats a guard should have

while shaq's stats reflected that of a post player, better rebounds, blocks and fg%

kobe had better stats vs the two strongest teams they faced (kings and spurs) while shaq took advantage of the weaker matchups

kobe had better averages during road games while shaq was better at home

shaq had more turnovers


so please take your nonsense elsewhere, we need to start talking about john wall 

But you can make the argument that Kobe was largely the beneficiary of teams focusing on and trying to control Shaq. He was clearly the focal point for the Lakers in that era. Don't think you can make that argument the other way around.
 
shaq averaged 1 more point than kobe

kobe had a better ft%, steals, assists. basically all the stats a guard should have

while shaq's stats reflected that of a post player, better rebounds, blocks and fg%

kobe had better stats vs the two strongest teams they faced (kings and spurs) while shaq took advantage of the weaker matchups

kobe had better averages during road games while shaq was better at home

shaq had more turnovers


so please take your nonsense elsewhere, we need to start talking about john wall 

But you can make the argument that Kobe was largely the beneficiary of teams focusing on and trying to control Shaq. He was clearly the focal point for the Lakers in that era. Don't think you can make that argument the other way around.
 
shaq averaged 1 more point than kobe

kobe had a better ft%, steals, assists. basically all the stats a guard should have

while shaq's stats reflected that of a post player, better rebounds, blocks and fg%

kobe had better stats vs the two strongest teams they faced (kings and spurs) while shaq took advantage of the weaker matchups

kobe had better averages during road games while shaq was better at home

shaq had more turnovers


so please take your nonsense elsewhere, we need to start talking about john wall 

But you can make the argument that Kobe was largely the beneficiary of teams focusing on and trying to control Shaq. He was clearly the focal point for the Lakers in that era. Don't think you can make that argument the other way around.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom