2015-2016 NBA Regular Season - MDA to HOU - All-NBA - Harden snubbed - Anthony Davis is broke

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lebron deleted "#TheLand" from his Twitter bio
laugh.gif
it begins 
nerd.gif


next we see lebron at a baseball game with a yankees hat on 
 
They just said on lebatard show, that Curry shoots something like 62% from beyond 25 feet this year. That percentage is better then 14, 2016 all stars shot from 5 feet and in from the rim.
 
Last edited:
Agreed bro

What's your opinion on Phil Jackson anyway?

@Hot Route
 
I'm sure he interviewed Jeanie multiple times

Phil invented the self face knuckle jab and face graze all in one stroke.

Dude scammed the knicks and took all the credit in the world by riding MJ‘s success.

But dude be chilling with 20 points down staring into space. 3 more rings with LA this way.

ZB6e8Vd.gif
 
Last edited:
I think Blake is a lot better than you do, but as of right now Draymond is the second most important player on a team that is having a historically great season and Blake isn't even playing. So, there you go.
let me ask you a hypothetical . if Blake and draymond switched places. You don't think the clippers would be a better team?
 
Seriously, last night's game was bad on both ends. I actually felt the Refs were TRYING to give the game to the Hawks. They just couldn't pull it out.

That Draymond 3 was definitely some lucky stuff but it's seriously just destiny or something for the Warriors. I remember watching the Lakers back in the day hit some bs lucky shots too and thinking this some "bull." I guess the basketball gods felt Warriors fans have suffered way too much with bad luck so now EVERYTHING and i mean EVERYTHING is going our way. It's crazy to finally be on the other side of luck.

THIS!

It seems like every dynasty-type team in the past always have the ball bounce their way, as if the talent wasn't good enough. The Lakers always had a lucky bounce here & there, even though they had two of the most dominant players at their position  :smh:

i've finally accepted they will break the regular season record :smh:
what the W's are doing is unbelievable. hard not to appreciate how talented they are.
 
I don't know if any of you listen to podcast, The Vertical's branch of Podcast are awesome man. Just heard their podcast with Brad Stevens which was an eye opening listen into the difference between college and NBA level coaching.
 
Blake fits well with what the Clippers run, Draymond fits well with what the Warriors run.

If they switched places I think both teams would have similar records but both are best where they are now.
 
I don't know why Dray vs Blake became such a hot topic this year. :lol:

I think if you trade them for each other, both teams get worse. Draymond does things for the Warriors that Blake can't do, and Blake when healthy does things for the Clippers that Draymond can't do.
 
I'd say maybe dray is better for the dubs than blake is for the clippers

I don't know if any of you listen to podcast, The Vertical's branch of Podcast are awesome man. Just heard their podcast with Brad Stevens which was an eye opening listen into the difference between college and NBA level coaching.

Guessing it had something to do with grown men, egos, travel, contracts, politics, business etc
 
Blake fits well with what the Clippers run, Draymond fits well with what the Warriors run.

If they switched places I think both teams would have similar records but both are best where they are now.
I disagree that answer seems very cliché.thanks @hot route.
I want to hear law dogs answer though because he's a very realistic and unbiased clipper fan.
 
Last edited:
I don't know why Dray vs Blake became such a hot topic this year.
laugh.gif


I think if you trade them for each other, both teams get worse. Draymond does things for the Warriors that Blake can't do, and Blake when healthy does things for the Clippers that Draymond can't do.
To your point, The Clippers offense is designed for them to get open mid-range jumpers. There's nothing to suggest that Draymond would be better than blake at taking and making the midrange shot. 33% of blake's shots this year are midrange jumpers, compared to 4% for Draymond. In an offense that's centered around the midrange jumper, there's no framework out there that could make one assume the Clippers would be better with Draymond.

That being said, The Warriors offense obviously revolves around the 3pt line and there's nothing to suggest that the Warriors would be better with the lack of 3pt shooting that would come with Blake. 

Both are great where they are.
 
Guessing it had something to do with grown men, egos, travel, contracts, politics, business etc
It's a lot, but one of the main things he said he had to adjust to was the lack of practice time. He said the celtics were on like practice 45 or something this season, and at this time at butler they would be approaching practice #90, not counting the 2 and 3 a days that they do before the season starts. The games come so frequent, that preservation is just as important as practice.
 
Last edited:
I don't see the clippers having a problem scoring without Blake. So drays d and his all purpose game wouldn't make the clippers better?
 
I disagree that answer seems very cliché.thanks @hot route.
I want to hear law dogs answer though because he's a very realistic and unbiased clipper fan.

Its really a hard question to answer because the way both teams play is catered to the strengths of those particular players. So, no, I don't think you could just flip Blake and Draymond and the Clippers would be better because they are different. But if the Clippers changed the system a bit to incorporate Draymond better, who knows? If they were any better, it would be marginal at best.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom