- 526
- 70
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
Numbers most definitely do lie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Numbers most definitely do lie.
Breh, you're going to want to sit this one out
You are crazy. I haven't been on NT bball until the ECF last year so I can't speak for anyone else but that dude is tough as nails, sets teammates up and plays both sides of the court. And Chris Paul is low key a top 50 player of all time and I hate the Clippers but numbers don't lie
Wouldn't be surprised. Actually surprised he never has
Rudy Gay gonna add himself to the 50 list
Breh, you're going to want to sit this one out
Why? I'd take Conley over Dame any day to build a team around. And fact is Chris Paul's numbers are incredible. 19 pts 10 asts 2.5 stls for his career and has led the league in assists 4x and steals 6x. He acts like a clown on the court but he isn't the reason the clips haven't won anything.
Breh, you're going to want to sit this one out
let's not get into a PG debate tho
NBA is byke in less than 2 hours
Breh, you're going to want to sit this one out
Why? I'd take Conley over Dame any day to build a team around. And fact is Chris Paul's numbers are incredible. 19 pts 10 asts 2.5 stls for his career and has led the league in assists 4x and steals 6x. He acts like a clown on the court but he isn't the reason the clips haven't won anything.
I would just rather start Noah because Pau and Mirotic is horrific on defense. Pau can be the offensive hub on the second unit and have Gibson next to him on defense.Damn what did Pau do? I feel like Pau definitely needs to start and Noah or Mirotic can sub in
Playing significantly better than Noah last season is all I'm aware of. Has he looked like trash in the preseason or something?
1. Westbrook
2. Lowry
3. Paul
4. Lillard
5. Wall
Derrick Williams dropping first 50
I would just rather start Noah because Pau and Mirotic is horrific on defense. Pau can be the offensive hub on the second unit and have Gibson next to him on defense.
BTW,
Player A is Mike Conley aka Top 5 aka Criminally Underrated PG of the Century aka Build-a-Team-Around
Player B is George Hill
The more you know.
BTW,
Player A is Mike Conley aka Top 5 aka Criminally Underrated PG of the Century aka Build-a-Team-Around
Player B is George Hill
The more you know.
Player B but if you solely look at PER (which is biased toward the offensive side of the ball) and ORTG, but if I am building a team they are very close. If I'm building a team, which has been my case to begin with, I want a PG that defends and passes the ball very well. I don't want my point guard taking 16+ shots a game. A is a hair better defensively but B has more assists per game, but that doesn't tell the whole story when it comes to getting others involved.Here's a perfect example. Look at just these numbers:
Based off numbers alone, who is the superior player?