Simultaneous terrorist attacks around Paris...Vol. Here we go again.Update 07/14/16 p42: Nice terror

Mamba MVP said:
 
Dathbgboy said:
People in Pennsylvania are more upset at the fact that the state will use money to house and feed the immigrants for who knows how long when we haven't had a budget since July and pre-k programs are closing left and right and we have homeless vets.
Click to expand...
People love to bring up education and the homeless problem. You know what would help that? Not funding another conflict overseas and actually investing at home. As much as is spent on defense it's a shame there's not built in better programs to take care of the vets.
Click to expand...
You're making too much sense.
 
There are a lot of ways to spend the money but at the end of the day the people that make these decisions are getting paid a lot of money to do other things so we gotta figure out another way.
 
Slicknick951 said:
There are a lot of ways to spend the money but at the end of the day the people that make these decisions are getting paid a lot of money to do other things so we gotta figure out another way.
Click to expand...


It's such an intricate system with an infinite amount of variables to consider, but an absolute fresh start needs to happen. This paradigm isn't sustainable and isn't a fair and just one for the public.

The problem is that we cannot look to the current paradigm to change, change has to happen outside of the system. A new system has to emerge.

It's not something that will happen instantaneously, but overtime it WILL happen, it's already happening. What you see in the news are the markings of the claws as they cling on to the sinking ship.

We have to overthrow the corruption in ourselves first. Heal ourselves. When more individuals do that, organization will be the next step. It can't be just "domestic" either. It has to be a collective evolution of humanity.

Basically, if we are looking to the establishment for change, you might as well quit while you're ahead because the system works perfectly fine for them. The change needs to happen from the majority.
 
You what's really sad and disheartening, we know the problems and have solutions or even step to the solutions, but don't have the resources nor the power to put them into play :smh:
 
superblyTRIFE said:
Where was all the anti-Syrian refugee talk in the U.S. before the Paris attack?

And why are people so against it now when so far, none of the terrorists involved have been identified as Syrian refugees?
Click to expand...
They never wanted the refugees, and the Paris attacks gives them an excuse to back their prior opinions. Republicans have been against refugee settlement from the beginning, now they have a convenient reason to present to the public
 
AZwildcats said:
They never wanted the refugees, and the Paris attacks gives them an excuse to back their prior opinions. Republicans have been against refugee settlement from the beginning, now they have a convenient reason to present to the public
Click to expand...


Yep, it's a win/win for the repubs. Gives credence to their aggressive foreign policies and allows them to justify their anti-refugee stance.

Funny how many folks eat it up.
 
sugafree said:
ChampCruThik said:
View media item 1794735
Click to expand...

Some ******ed American made this up because fools love riding Putin's jock.....
This is exactly why Russians ridicule us Americans...dumb gullible sheep who believe and take everything they see on the internet or social media as gospel.
Click to expand...

How about the time the mainstream media mistranslated Iran's president saying he wants to 'wipe Israel off the face of the map' and everyone's jimmies were rustled.

....we really gotta get our sh together and dig a little deeper before grabbing the pitchforks :smh: :smh: :smh: :nerd:
 
Last edited:
TeamJordan79 said:
How about the time the mainstream media mistranslated Iran's president saying he wants to 'wipe Israel off the face of the map' and everyone's jimmies were rustled.

....we really gotta get our sh together and dig a little deeper before grabbing the pitchforks
mean.gif
mean.gif
mean.gif
nerd.gif
Click to expand...
Welcome to America where the majority of the population's attention span is that of a 3 year old.

The Paris tragedy will be forgotten by Christmas.....

Some ground troops are gonna be killed in Syria in 2016 joining the list of the already 6k+ we lost since 2001 over this stupid ****...

Nothing new in America....
 
Have any of you thought why France benefits from entering war in Syria? Why they didn't go to Iraq? They are a military power after all.

Let us do a cost-benefit analysis. Does ISIS really benefit from airstrikes or getting attacked? They have been pummeled by all these countries yet are still thriving?

Has anyone also heard about the conspiracy it was the Egyptians who planted the bomb on the plane in order for it to explode over Turkey. Supposedly it was an accident it blew up over Sharm El-Sheikh in Egypt. Turkey and Egypt are enemies and Egypt wanted Russia to blame Turkey so they can create conflict between the two. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt are allied, affliated and funded by Turkey's President Erdogan He is the ones who backed Morsi to take over Egypt. Sisi, current leader in charge of Egypt's military dictatorship wants to get back at Erdogan. Hmmm...the conspiracy could be plausible.
 
Last edited:
DubA169 said:
The conspiracy doesnt work if isis is taking credit for the bomb
https://www.yahoo.com/tech/s/isis-says-soda-bomb-detonated-russian-plane-got-151825789.html

Even though one coulf argue any article is false


http://www.wsj.com/articles/ongoing...rted-at-radisson-blu-hotel-in-mali-1448011876
Click to expand...

Does not mean anything.

First of all, ISIS seems to take credit for anything. They even took credit for attacks that were not done by them before.

All of these things that are happening just don't happen for no reason. There are more powerful forces at play that pull strings.

This all goes back to benefiting the big powers, military industry complex, and corporations, and geo-political interests.

You need to read between the lines.

Countries don't go to war just for humanitarian reasons. They also always need a catalyst to further their interests.

France's interest in the region has always been Syria, Lebanon and certain North African countries such as Mali.France has been involved militarily in Mali for years now.

Lo and behold,right now there is a hostage crisis going on in Mali. What better way to approve more military and equipment and pass it through government after this event while they also they raid Syria. Kill 2 birds with one stone.

To answer my question, France didn't go into Iraq not because they were anti-war. Iraq is not their interest, since it is for the Brits and the U.S. Syria and Mali are a different story.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand why Egypt would ever do that to a longstanding ally like Russia even though they hate Turkey. Also,even if they suspected the Turks, i doubt much would come out of it given that war with Turkey would mean war with NATO...
 
Last edited:
Rolaholic said:
I don't understand why Egypt would ever do that to a longstanding ally like Russia even though they hate Turkey. Also,even if they suspected the Turks, ibdoubtuch would come out of it given that war with Turkey would mean war with NATO...
Click to expand...

Egypt are ruthless. Russia is an ally but Egypt would do it as a means to get back at Turkey which they despise. Egypt can then also easily blame it on egyptian Muslim brotherhood.

Egypt is also Israel's ally. Israel also despises Muslim brotherhood in Egypt who in turn are allied with Hamas. Why was it that right off the bat the Brits and U.S. knew it was a bomb.Russia was all perplexed and Egypt was aciting all shady. For sure the bomb was planted by an Egyptian or airport staff or someone who had easy access to that plane. It is now said the person went on board the plane and planted it in the cabin. But going back to the Americans and Brits, it was israeli intelligence that told them it was a bomb.

Again just conspiracy, but it is plausible.
 
Last edited:
I was looking on Google Maps to see where all of these countries were located in proximity to one another that when you factor in the hatred for one another and what not, it's just all bad. It's even worse when you have people from the "outside" (U.S., Great Britain) gettin involved, makes it worse. It's like the only solution to the problems over there are to either level it all or separate the countries, since neither will ever happen, problem will persist.
 
Dathbgboy said:
I was looking on Google Maps to see where all of these countries were located in proximity to one another that when you factor in the hatred for one another and what not, it's just all bad. It's even worse when you have people from the "outside" (U.S., Great Britain) gettin involved, makes it worse. It's like the only solution to the problems over there are to either level it all or separate the countries, since neither will ever happen, problem will persist.
Click to expand...

Those countries were creations of western allies after the victories of WWI and WWII. WWI was particularly important because countries like Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands saw their outside influence greatly reduced (Germany lost all of its colonies), while the victors of that war (particularly the UK and France) gained more territories. The borders of all the countries in the Middle East and a large part of Africa (Ethiopia and Liberia were never colonized) were drawn with very little input from the local authorities. It's ridiculous when you think about it.
 
Gry60 said:
Dathbgboy said:
I was looking on Google Maps to see where all of these countries were located in proximity to one another that when you factor in the hatred for one another and what not, it's just all bad. It's even worse when you have people from the "outside" (U.S., Great Britain) gettin involved, makes it worse. It's like the only solution to the problems over there are to either level it all or separate the countries, since neither will ever happen, problem will persist.
Click to expand...

Those countries were creations of western allies after the victories of WWI and WWII. WWI was particularly important because countries like Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands saw their outside influence greatly reduced (Germany lost all of its colonies), while the victors of that war (particularly the UK and France) gained more territories. The borders of all the countries in the Middle East and a large part of Africa (Ethiopia and Liberia were never colonized) were drawn with very little input from the local authorities. It's ridiculous when you think about it.
Click to expand...

You can tell when you look at the man made lines. And all the fighting is hurting everyone in the countries. It's almost like, why can't they all sit at the table w/o outside interference unless as a moderator and come to agreements to make everyone happy for the most part. Seems too simple to work though.
 
Wr said:
Interest
Click to expand...
Not hard at all too invade divide conquer and exploit countries in Africa when they had no unity or will to progress as a nation in the first place.

As much as it sucks .....that's just where we ended up on the totem pole....

I'm over it....especially when you had African governments willing to sell out thier resources and land for a quick penny.
 
27 dead in the hotel killing in Mali

A terrorist group called Al Mourabitoun whose affiliated to Al Qaeda took responsibility :smh:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom