So you have been ranting for 3 pages about something you never understood from the jump.
Please exit the thread.
Why do we have to use LITTLE KIDS to show this though? People that haven't even experienced puberty yet. People that haven't even really been on this earth that long. People that don't even understand what SEXUALITY is.
Why are we using an 8 year old boy to prove that, "Homosexuality is a real thing."
Why the kids is all I ask
So let me ask you this. Say a man, turned himself into a woman, and is now competing in female sports. Are the people that have a problem with this because it creates a competitive advantage going to be considered transPHOBIC as well?
It doesn't "bother" me outside of simply it being on the news and me having an opinion on the topic.
Right, there were kids you could tell were going down that path but can they be labeled HOMOSEXUAL at the age of 8? When they don't even know what sex is?
I think the word sickness is being used as a synonym of abnormality.
So based on your logic, Bruce STILL has his penis, so he hasn't gone through a FULL transition. How and why is a person with a penis being considered a woman? And winning woman of the year awards?
Like, help me rationalize what their motive was with that other than, "Getting hits."
So basically a man that has went through the "full transformation" would still be stronger than the women he is competiting against, if he is an athlete.
So the question remains, if anyone has a problem with the competitive advantage that a trans-woman would have over traditional women, should they be considered transPHOBIC?
They know the words that offend people. That doesn't mean they know what sexuality is Anton.