The Air Jordan XV OG Black/Red returns Spring 2017

160jordansdeep said:
THE WORST JORDAN EVER

EVEN WORSE THEN THE JORDAN 2012 TO JORDAN 30
Click to expand...

Blasphamy!!!! Nah real talk, I felt this way up until the AJ 18 came out. Those were like spreading poop on a biscuit, for me at least. I still liked the 15 enough to buy though. At this point I would take a retro 15 over a retro 10 anyday. Love the OG's, love some of the retro colorways but I hate overall quality on the retro 10. I can't say that about 15's as I think the CDP are slightly more comfier than OG's were. My 2 cents.
v8erman said:
Yeah i like the xxi though.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
The Collector said:
15 > 19-30 IMO
Click to expand...

THIS. Like without question. But hey dudes have their opinions and that's fine. I always thought these black ones in particular are very dope. The design was inspired by a stealth fighter jet and thats exactly how they look on feet when I would rock them. These wear best with jeans to cover the tongue. Also had the Carolina OGs back in the day which were also dope and needs to be retro-ed.
 
oh yeah the jordan 2010 was a horrible sneaker

disgusting but i did like the 2011

i have a few pairs

the 2011 was the last good yearly marquee shoe

but the 15 are terrible

i sold the pairs i had years ago
 
Last edited:
im gonna pass tho... unless i get them for the dumb low for the collection. i had the OGs and the Retros and neither of them looked good on my feet unfortunately :smh:
 
I hate this jordan more than any other in the line. In fact, this shoe was so ugly i stopped checking for new Jordans for a few years because of it. easiest pass of my life.
 
babyJs23 said:
Sub $150 for the CDP's and maybe a few retros.

OG's are still set high, but I'm sure sellers are willing to negotiate their asking price(s).

I actually hit up a few sellers on the bay and even negotiated to half of what they set it at. I didn't pull the trigger though. I was fishing around when I searched a few weeks ago.
 
Click to expand...
meh that's not a steal to me. A steal imo is back when the cdp's came out when most of the higher #'d sigs could be had for like $75-100 bucks.
 
Last edited:
Had them back in 1999 until 2006.
They looked better on the shelves than on foot in my opinion because once you laced them up properly they crease at behind the toe area very awkwardly :frown:
 
jumpman cbt2 said:
Had them back in 1999 until 2006.
They looked better on the shelves than on foot in my opinion because once you laced them up properly they crease at behind the toe area very awkwardly :frown:
Click to expand...

Same experience. I've seen them on foot with other people have they were dope tho. Like no creases and they were laced right (tight). I just chalked it up as my feet being turrible :lol:
 
I remember having the East Coast and West Coast 19's and the upper part of the net style tongue ( near the "23" badge) was torturous on the lower part of my leg, above the forefoot.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

therealest1
Jordan 2 Low Cherry Blossom - 2024
Replies
2
Views
803
sneakaprince
sneakaprince
therealest1
Jordan IV RM
Replies
16
Views
3K
Public Enemy
Public Enemy
barrebaby
So will we ever see JB drop the retro 4+ blue speckle that was supposed to be after 25 years of waiting?
Replies
11
Views
3K
airdhazzal
airdhazzal
therealest1
Jordan Tatum 3 - Holiday 2024
Replies
6
Views
2K
kyngpen413
kyngpen413
therealest1
Jordan Jumpman Pro Quick
Replies
20
Views
5K
fdub
fdub

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom