- 23,552
- 14,877
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
Yeah the judge can ask the officer if you actually had your phone up to your ear, the officer won't lie. He only seen you place it down. Then you could explain what you actually doing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What state are you in and how much is the ticket? I would definitely request for a hearing from a judge. Is there a clear cut law that says you can't have your phone in your hand?
Yeah the judge can ask the officer if you actually had your phone up to your ear, the officer won't lie. He only seen you place it down. Then you could explain what you actually doing.
But you got an automatic doe...papi out here pretending to drive stickSorry wrong description on clutch. I meant stick shift. I was resting my hand on the stick shift
But you got an automatic doe...papi out here pretending to drive stickSorry wrong description on clutch. I meant stick shift. I was resting my hand on the stick shift View media item 1879929
You dun goofed. You shoudve told him that and argued right there. Youre basically screwed right now, its his word vs yours. You have no proof of a bt set and he had his statement on the ticket. Why you aint argue?
Judge fell for the old psychic bluetooth defense.False.
I’ve personally seen a woman beat this same exact case in court. She pled not guilty the first time around and when her second court date came she chose to represent herself. Her argument was that she had to psychically place her bluetooth device next to her phone for the two to pair. Cop only saw her reaching near the phone and wrongfully wrote her a ticket.
From my perspective I think the judge favored her because she came correct. She was respectful, well dressed and spoke direct. She brought in the bluetooth device and was going to show the judge how it fails to pair at a distance and why it needs to psychically touch her phone. You can tell the judge figured nobody who isn’t innocent is going to take the time to miss two work days just to beat this nonsense case, so he cut her off and said she was innocent. Also, most cops never show up for a second court date when you choose to fight the original one. You have a chance fam.
Judge fell for the old psychic bluetooth defense.
Off topic but reminded me of when I see dudes with earbuds in while driving. Irks me smh.
I wish we had that. What state are you in?Idk how it works in California but in the states I've been in if you get a ticket of any kind and you go see a hearing officer they will usually athe least reduce the amount if you have a good story. It's not like some trial where you have to produce evidence and have a solid defense. It's not even that serious. I've been completely in the wrong and admitted it and they still knocked off half just to get me to pay it that day.
Illegal and dangerous. Too big of a distraction imo.Off topic but reminded me of when I see dudes with earbuds in while driving. Irks me smh.
why?
Judge fell for the old psychic bluetooth defense.
Illegal and dangerous. Too big of a distraction imo.Off topic but reminded me of when I see dudes with earbuds in while driving. Irks me smh.
why?
Idk how it works in California but in the states I've been in if you get a ticket of any kind and you go see a hearing officer they will usually athe least reduce the amount if you have a good story. It's not like some trial where you have to produce evidence and have a solid defense. It's not even that serious. I’ve been completely in the wrong and admitted it and they still knocked off half just to get me to pay it that day.
Lmao.But you got an automatic doe...papi out here pretending to drive stick
punching an imaginary clutch and making vroom vroom sounds while driving