NT: The People v OJ / 30 for 30: OJ

she wasn't underage when they met, they said she was 18. he didn't rape her on their first date. he did get hella aggressive.
 
So basically it seems like the people arguing OJ didn't do it believed he needed to have more injuries than a bloody swollen finger. Ok.
 
So basically it seems like the people arguing OJ didn't do it believed he needed to have more injuries than a bloody swollen finger. Ok.
How does a washed OJ murder two people in that fashion and only have a swollen or cut finger while Goldman is littered with War wounds?

It doesn't make sense.

I'm fully convinced he didn't actually commit the murders. That much i'm personally sure on. But he could for sure have been in on it in some way.
 
That's not everything thats been said tho.

The dirty racist cop finding the incriminating evidence against him.
The blood on the glove not being dried up after how long ?
Taking his blood to the crime scene makes zero sense and points to being framed.
They didn't prove he killed her plain and simple.
 
Like I said, if you take away personal bias, or any kind of bias,

there's no way you could have convicted him. 

For gods sake the person who collected the evidence is on tape saying he wants to frame ******* 
laugh.gif
 

There's just as much evidence suggesting Nicole and Ron were parts of a drug deal gone wrong as there is saying OJ is guilty.
 
So basically it seems like the people arguing OJ didn't do it believed he needed to have more injuries than a bloody swollen finger. Ok.

How does a washed OJ murder two people in that fashion and only have a swollen or cut finger while Goldman is littered with War wounds?

It doesn't make sense.

I'm fully convinced he didn't actually commit the murders. That much i'm personally sure on. But he could for sure have been in on it in some way.

Have you seen OJs workout video? Don't know what you mean by a washed OJ?

I mean do you think you can beat a "washed" Michael Jordan in 1 on 1?
 
Like I said, if you take away personal bias, or any kind of bias,

there's no way you could have convicted him. 

For gods sake the person who collected the evidence is on tape saying he wants to frame ******* :lol:  


There's just as much evidence suggesting Nicole and Ron were parts of a drug deal gone wrong as there is saying OJ is guilty.

What's the evidence that Ron and Nicole were part of a drug deal gone wrong?
 
- Nicole was a thot and getting tossed up before, during, and after OJ. The fact that OJ raped her on their first date, and her reaction to that being "I think I really like him" is sick. What's also sick is messing w/a married man with kids. If that ain't a ***, then I don't know what is. 
 

This is one thing that's new to me as I started watching these docs. Back when the trial originally happened, and following it then (I was 7-9), I mostly remember everything about OJ's character both good and bad, yet all I remembered about Nicole was her being portrayed as a nice wholesome chick who did modeling. I never heard any of the dark said of her as far as sex, drugs, etc. Just an interesting note thinking about media portrayal while watching these.

There's a video of OJ working out at 46 years old? 

Link me


They used it in the trial against him

It's some corny workout video

Is that the video where he's briskly walking :lol:?
 
There is one of the workout videos:



But the outtakes are much watch TV, my mans Juice wild as hell

 
Last edited:
Yall are really that dense?

Your still arguing about whether OJ did it or not?
laugh.gif
Shocking to me as well.

Did he personally put the hands on and kill them alone, No. 

Was he there when the murders were going on, with out a doubt, and I don't think he was hands off.

I wouldn't have convicted him if I was in that Jury, no way in hell.

But I most certainly am not shocked they gave his *** a murder sentence for the Hotel misdemeanor.
 
Yall are really that dense?

Your still arguing about whether OJ did it or not? :lol:
Nobody who says OJ did it can ever explain how he did it on his own. Those who say he had help got no leads on who those ppl are.

Nobody knows or can make sense of it but they still believe it based off of hunches and feelings. Pretty obvious why there's still arguments.
 
They definitely tried to paint Nicole as this sweet soccer mom when she was a coke sniffing thot. Not saying she wasn't a good person but its always interesting seeing how the media pushes a image to fit their storyline.
 
Back
Top Bottom