OG Nike Air Jordan III Retro True Blue BLACK FRIDAY '16

jaylaw15 said:
:rofl: I've heard, "jb doesn't have to improve the materials" and "complaints don't matter because jb won't change materials" so much for THIS release, I'm starting to wonder if folks have selective memory. The cyber 3s have the best quality a retro 3 has seen in years, the NA 4s and maroons had fat better leather IMPROVEMENTS than recent 4s and 6s(pre 2014). Same goes for the double nickel 10s, hare 7s even had better leather than the cdp. Even 1s have had better quality since the lasers which were the first GR remastered 1s. Jb had already improved quality drastically since 2015. Which is why it's worth noting that these fall short. Bad quality materials isn't the norm for jb since they began the remaster, that's why it's so bad that these have bad materials
Click to expand...

Yup this is exactly it. Leather just hasnt held up to the rest of the remastered jays and 220 is a lot but if these were limited and retailed for 180 people wouldve been paying probably 250 to resellers. Thats just how it is because people were paying resell for tons of poor quality leather jays like cement 4 and fire red 4s in 2012.

These are definitely better then a majority of releases that came out before remastered. Plus from what I heard step in comfort is on point. People forgetting that shoes are meant to be worn not touched haha.

I've been happy with the remastered shoes so far and although this probably isnt its best representation of the series, its still better then lots of pervious retros I've owned.
 
Well just like the other Retro OG 1s thread that I have stuck in the past, I'm bouncing out of this one.........unsubscribed, and yall can continue with your Yeezy talk in tjhis Jordan 3 thread
 
TF12 said:
 They probably should be $160, but then they would all be off the shelves by now and we would all be paying $220 anyway.

 I like it better this way. 
Click to expand...

This is why we pay Nike resell prices...statements like this. You are correct though. Lol.
 
show time 96 said:
Nice it's great that you got the pair you wanted :nthat:

But why it look's like one pic was with flash and the other wasn't & that's the only difference :lol:
Click to expand...

Lol......raffle pair was taken earlier with lights off in my room and exchanged pair taken when I just got back from the exchange with the lights on [emoji]128513[/emoji]
 
Last edited:
Having worn these for pretty much since Wednesday. There is no signs of paint chip/cracking. Unlike the the 2011. After a couple of hours, the midsole paint chipped off. Lol.

Jordan 4 white cement show no sign of cracking and those have been rocked a lot since February.

Did they fix that for 2016 Jordan 3/4 middles?
 
Salacious Crumb said:
Having worn these for pretty much since Wednesday. There is no signs of paint chip/cracking. Unlike the the 2011. After a couple of hours, the midsole paint chipped off. Lol.

Jordan 4 white cement show no sign of cracking and those have been rocked a lot since February.

Did they fix that for 2016 Jordan 3/4 middles?
Click to expand...

The 2016 laser 4s are the only ones that I have seen cracking. I was very disappointed.
 
Leonard706 said:
This is why we pay Nike resell prices...statements like this. You are correct though. Lol.
Click to expand...

I meant it more in a general sense, as I don't often pay resell.


And while I don't care for the pricing model, I do like that it has increased availability and if I don't happen to care for my pair, Nike has a great return policy. You can'tget the same guarantees when paying a resellers premium.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom