OG Nike Air Jordan III Retro True Blue BLACK FRIDAY '16

MONOPOLIZE said:
Long and short , if u bought & youre actually keeping these, you LOST..

The Hypebeast are the ppl taking the J man dunk arm ,from the ball all the way to the arm pit , up the back end, by letting Brand J hold your $220 for these fails.
Click to expand...
Nah, I paid $132 and I'm completely happy with my purchase.

Thanks for playing, though.
 
You guys DO know the whole "the True Blue 3s are sitting because of the quality" theory doesn't make sense, right....................?
 
Last edited:
hassan16 said:
Someone in the jams thread said Nike took the QC workers from the true blues and put em all on these.

:lol: I really really hope so. Idk if y'all remember my comment about these and the higher cut of patent leather portion looking like a mirror. Yup, Ima be flexin in my reflection, starin at my jams watching myself hittin some yams *cue camron as Rico hitting dougie scene from paid in full gif*
Click to expand...

That was me and that mirror comment from a couple weeks ago is what i think about now everytime i see a new pic. Im like 'yeah i could prob see some action going down through those pumpman jams'.

I wont be surprised if we start getting some weird japanese fetish vids on youtube upskirting by filming the toebox while they step their foot under some unsuspecting chick at a bus stop while breathing heavy.
 
Last edited:
tonytobacco said:
That was me and that mirror comment from a couple weeks ago is what i think about now everytime i see a new pic. Im like 'yeah i could prob see some action going down through those pumpman jams'.

I wont be surprised if we start getting some weird japanese fetish vids on youtube upskirting by filming the toebox while they step their foot under some unsuspecting chick at a bus stop while breathing heavy.
Click to expand...

Hahahahaha.

That's crazy because I thought it was the official images that made them look so shiny. I still have the last release and I'm not the hugest fan of 11s so I'm content on the drop.

I do want those 9s though.
 
GrizzlyAnimal said:
 
Click to expand...
believe it.  not even going to complain about paying full retail either 
tongue.gif
 
 
Last edited:
I had decided to pass up on these for the time being, but my girl ended up surprising me with a pair. My pair was pretty good quality wise. She said "I know how you are about wanting your shoes damn near flawless out the box so I went over several pairs before I picked one" lol. She did mention the midsole issues on several pairs.
 
Creased laces?? You better be joking. Lace those back up and rock them before I do
 
Last edited:
tonytobacco said:
grZAZ_f-thumbnail-100-0_s-600x0.jpg
Click to expand...
I dont know what this is supposed to mean? my comment was funny? maybe what I shouldve said was jb is TRYING to take advantage of the consumer...?

i feel this way b/c its like sure, theyre not forcing me to buy anything....but I for one love the shoe and can look past the stiff leather and I'm not expecting a flawless shoe by any means BUT for me the price is just way over the top. To me it feels like they are trying to take advantage of people like me who really want the shoe, and even though its a crazy price will pay just b/c its such an iconic shoe in a beautiful cw....I almost took the bait also, I purchased the shoes admittedly without really thinking about it. I knew I wanted the shoe and have for a very long time, so I purchased....but when I think about it I just dont want to play their game. Like I said before my last 3 purchase was the FR 3 for 160, something about looking at my box price of 160 yesterday just made me feel totally uncomfortable paying 220 for these. I returned my pairs and even though I still really want them im just going to pass altogether if I cant get them for a price im comfortable with...
 
Last edited:
They...sigh...they look slanted to the right at the heel like the tower of piza. Set them down on a flat surface.

That white stitching in front of the back ep panel is annoying tf out of me.

Send em back is my verdict.
 
theonewskill said:
I dont know what this is supposed to mean? my comment was funny? maybe what I shouldve said was jb is TRYING to take advantage of the consumer...?

i feel this way b/c its like sure, theyre not forcing me to buy anything....but I for one love the shoe and can look past the stiff leather and I'm not expecting a flawless shoe by any means BUT for me the price is just way over the top. To me it feels like they are trying to take advantage of people like me who really want the shoe, and even though its a crazy price will pay just b/c its such an iconic shoe in a beautiful cw....I almost took the bait also, I purchased the shoes admittedly without really thinking about it. I knew I wanted the shoe and have for a very long time, so I purchased....but when I think about it I just dont want to play their game. Like I said before my last 3 purchase was the FR 3 for 160, something about looking at my box price of 160 yesterday just made me feel totally uncomfortable paying 220 for these. I returned my pairs and even though I still really want them im just going to pass altogether if I cant get them for a price im comfortable with...
Click to expand...
Im not sure what its supposed to mean either, its blank.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom