KanyIZZY
formerly j o 19
- 18,317
- 47,576
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2004
Still have my 08 CDP worn like 2x .. not letting them go either (I hope lol). They are too clean but I will certainly be after these. This is my favorite III.
Air Jordan III OG Black Cement returns Feb 2018 - Nike Air on the back
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by palma,
- Start date
- 93,956
- 32,975
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
- 14,528
- 19,154
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2008
Hell nah
- 48,204
- 28,230
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2006
Last edited:
- 10,412
- 1,646
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
going rate for ds 2011 size 9?
- 17,129
- 8,042
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2014
$450+
- 10,412
- 1,646
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
- 782
- 551
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2017
No one is paying that lol.
We don't know what they'll look like but JB Doesn't use paint that chips, shiny leather like the 2011 and jumpman air anymore. The 2018 should be a better buy.
Last edited:
- 106
- 402
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2016
View media item 2426630I'm good with these for now. 
- 1,115
- 517
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2012
I just sold my DS 2011 pair for $500 CAD which is around $360 USD, not even really close to prices on stockx
- 10,412
- 1,646
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
- 1,115
- 517
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2012
Yeah I was just looking, prices range from $350 - $550 with $550 being the last few sales in size 9.5 which was my size I sold but who knows how long that could take to get a buyer
- 38,122
- 74,959
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
- 10,412
- 1,646
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
- 320
- 154
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2015
What you guys think was better? The 2011 retro or the CDP??
- 20
- 13
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2017
CDP hands down.. 2011 isn't even real as far as shape goes... they look like banana shoes and not 3s
- 38,122
- 74,959
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 42060
Guest
88>94>01>08 cdp>2011
- 48,204
- 28,230
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2006
Last edited:
- 5,714
- 2,210
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2002
I would say around 2006 things started going down hill. The military and fire red ivs from that year were 2 of the worst releases of all time. It's kind of all mering together since its been so long lol, but the vs from that time frame were pretty solid imo. The most blue and tour yellow ivs from then we're pretty good though.
D
Deleted member 42060
Guest
[emoji]128591[/emoji]
Lets see where the 2018 stands
88>94>01>2018>cdp 08>2011?
- 320
- 154
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2015
Knowing us NT'ers in between the CDP and the 01
HOPEFULLY!! Please change the shape and Cement Print!
- 33
- 24
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2017
This makes me laugh. People are on here saying the '07 FR 3 was good quality. Haha. While it is better than the '11-'16 trash that has been put out, it is far from good quality. As some have said, quality fell off after '01. The'03 was a departure from the better quality of '01, but light years ahead of the '07. I own them all and can speak from experience.
That being said.....the '16 TB has terrible craftsmanship, but can feel "decent" once the leather has been worked. By that I mean allowing the so called tumbled leather to relax by being stressed. It is waaaayyyy too stiff out of the box. Too many people are worried about what they perceive as creasing, but that is exactly what tumbled leather is. Google any pic of a 1988 OG Jordan 3 and what you notice is the "quality" of the leather, (shape aside obviously). It looks premium because of stress marks which are very faint on the '16 retro. These stress marks add depth to the leather. Once the'16 TB 3 is relaxed, it gives more depth to the shoe. While not as nice as the '88, it definitely feels and looks better than straight out of the box.
That being said.....the '16 TB has terrible craftsmanship, but can feel "decent" once the leather has been worked. By that I mean allowing the so called tumbled leather to relax by being stressed. It is waaaayyyy too stiff out of the box. Too many people are worried about what they perceive as creasing, but that is exactly what tumbled leather is. Google any pic of a 1988 OG Jordan 3 and what you notice is the "quality" of the leather, (shape aside obviously). It looks premium because of stress marks which are very faint on the '16 retro. These stress marks add depth to the leather. Once the'16 TB 3 is relaxed, it gives more depth to the shoe. While not as nice as the '88, it definitely feels and looks better than straight out of the box.
- 33
- 24
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2017
The above is not saying that it will make the quality better. It just means it will "feel" better than the crap you feel out of the box, which is way to stiff. JB really needs to step it up in the quality and craftsmanship department.
- 320
- 154
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2015
Cement Print pattern is fine up until 2011's
Needs to be grey on grey of course
