Jordan 11 2001 Legit check and Price check

• Dec 3, 2016

• #1

obeycandy

23

10

Joined

Feb 29, 2016

Recently bought these, the jumpman seems sketch to me  (imo) need opinions. Just weird that the quality is worse than my 96 breds.

 

• Dec 3, 2016

• #2

obeycandy

23

10

Joined

Feb 29, 2016

b

 

• Dec 3, 2016

• #3

JRepp23

10,416

22,503

Joined

Oct 6, 2016

  The date is touching the barcode which is a plus.  But the patent cut/ shape not matching up to me.  Carbon looks good,  still questionable?//?  Others will help  hopefully

 

• Dec 3, 2016

• #4

succ

261

78

Joined

Sep 15, 2016

PL looks way too high and CF looks just too neat and Jumpman looks like it has a dislocated leg

Going with fake.

 

• Dec 4, 2016

• #5

pmpdaddyrobford

19,054

9,021

Joined

Dec 24, 2013

Succ said:

PL looks way too high and CF looks just too neat and Jumpman looks like it has a dislocated leg

Going with fake.

Click to expand...

2001 is higher than 2012

 

• Dec 4, 2016

• #6

obeycandy

23

10

Joined

Feb 29, 2016

so legit?

 

• Dec 5, 2016

• #7

obeycandy

23

10

Joined

Feb 29, 2016

b

 

• Dec 5, 2016

• #8

obeycandy

23

10

Joined

Feb 29, 2016

b

 

• Dec 5, 2016

• #9

sickickz23

8,939

5,394

Joined

Sep 7, 2005

Pic of the jumpman jordan tag placement?

 

• Dec 5, 2016

• #10

obeycandy

23

10

Joined

Feb 29, 2016

 

• Dec 5, 2016

• #11

sickickz23

8,939

5,394

Joined

Sep 7, 2005

No in front of the tongue. "Jumpman jordan"

 

• Dec 5, 2016

• #12

obeycandy

23

10

Joined

Feb 29, 2016

 

• Dec 6, 2016

• #13

sickickz23

8,939

5,394

Joined

Sep 7, 2005

Sorry for the delay....

Those are legit

 

• Dec 28, 2016

• #14

nggy

6

10

Joined

Dec 27, 2016

Legit check, 2001 pair. My cousin gave them to me. Jumpman looks suspicious. Thanks! View media item 2278014
View media item 2278016
View media item 2278022View media item 2278024View media item 2278032View media item 2278038View media item 2278039View media item 2278040View media item 2278041