Are we in a Simulation / Video Game Reality? vol Elon Musk

Elon 
smokin.gif
 
 
Yeah it would cuz then you have to get in to details like why is this simulation being ran and what's powering it. If we're in a simulation about to create another indistinguishable reality has actual reality achieved/discovered an endless energy source? Then to what purpose would allowing that to happen accomplish.

If we can create the sim then chances are we aren't in one. However, if we are in one we risk the chance of the sim being ended.

I feel you but this is assuming there has to be a real reason behind the simulation. In my mind it would make more sense to assume our simulation is not necessarily important
Why run an unimportant simulation at all then?


and is just one of many which can be tied to the multiverse/alternate reality theories.


When applying our known natural limits and human ego to the idea we begin assuming an endless energy source would be required.
The simulation argument was made up by human beings in the first place and the hypothetical scenario involves a posthuman civilization capable of creating and running the sim.

I'm not entirely sure what you're talking about his necessarily a simulation. Also if it's not humans or post humans who or what is running the simulation? I mean it is a simulation by technological means.

This isn't the dream hypothesis of one of the other adjacent theories like brain in a vat.


If we are in simulation, 100 years our time could be literal nanoseconds in "real time".
Why would that matter? Its a simulation not the matrix.

If we are in one and it's ended we wouldn't even know. We could have been rebooted countless times by now (deja vu, OOBE) and have no real clue.
Yeah, I know. Keep in mind if we are in a simulation, we are not real. Doesn't matter how time is passing in reality. We're never going to experience it unless the program of the simulation is changed.

This is why I used the phrase perfect simulation.

I liken it to Arthur C. Clarke's third law - "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". If we are in a sim, average people questioning it is a sure sign of it being imperfect.
This is flawed reasoning.

We could be in a perfect simulation and ppl can still question reality. Conceiving of a possibility does not make the simulation imperfect. Human being are capable of conceiving all sorts of possible and impossible scenarios and events. The simulation would be imperfect if humans could not conceive of the possibility that their reality is not real.


Inversely it could be a sign of glitching (woke) NPCs, hacks, or programmers coding data segments to test the limits of the program by having them influence others to recreate the simulation. Our sim could be 6 sims down, inception style.
This is just one possibility in one line of reasoning.

Questioning if reality is a simulation could all be a part of the perfect simulation. Since if we're not in a perfect simulation ppl can still question whether reality is a simulation.

I feel this but again it assumes that our presently known "simulated" human achievements are the benchmark.
Well as far as publicly known, there are no super computers running simulations. So it's not really the benchmark.

Regardless, notice I said "we". I'm talking about human beings in that reply simulating reality when you bring up scientists trying to recreate the human brain.

These are all very good points though, this is such a weird subject to talk about because basically every possible point is debatable due to the nature of the subject. Our thoughts on this are shaped by the media we have consumed that widen our ideas of what our existence could be.
The simulation hypothesis is very old. It isn't beholden to or shaped by just the media. Just imagination. Science and philosophy are the foundations of it. Another form of questioning reality which humanity has always done.
 
would it be wrong to say that the brain is the most complex thing in the universe?
 
Why run an unimportant simulation at all then?


Why not? People do it in video games every day. The Sims has been active since 2000.



The simulation argument was made up by human beings in the first place and the hypothetical scenario involves a posthuman civilization capable of creating and running the sim.

I'm not entirely sure what you're talking about his necessarily a simulation. Also if it's not humans or post humans who or what is running the simulation? I mean it is a simulation by technological means.

This isn't the dream hypothesis of one of the other adjacent theories like brain in a vat.


There are more theories than just post-human civilization running a simulation. I'm not talking about specifically Elon's idea of simulated reality. A simulation itself is imitation of real world processes or systems. A computer could be running the supposed simulation for all we know.


Why would that matter? Its a simulation not the matrix.


Relevance was you bringing up reality having an endless energy source. The Matrix was a simulation, simulated reality specifically.


Yeah, I know. Keep in mind if we are in a simulation, we are not real. Doesn't matter how time is passing in reality. We're never going to experience it unless the program of the simulation is changed.

Yes I agree. Going back to the previous point, this is why if we are being simmed then the endless energy wouldn't be necessary. 1000 sim years could be 11 real time seconds. Again to reference the Sims, days pass at a far different rate and you can even speed up time.



This is flawed reasoning.

We could be in a perfect simulation and ppl can still question reality. Conceiving of a possibility does not make the simulation imperfect. Human being are capable of conceiving all sorts of possible and impossible scenarios and events. The simulation would be imperfect if humans could not conceive of the possibility that their reality is not real.

I can concede this point but I still feel Clarke's third applies.



This is just one possibility in one line of reasoning.

Questioning if reality is a simulation could all be a part of the perfect simulation. Since if we're not in a perfect simulation ppl can still question whether reality is a simulation.


Definitely agree here.


Well as far as publicly known, there are no super computers running simulations. So it's not really the benchmark.

Regardless, notice I said "we". I'm talking about human beings in that reply simulating reality when you bring up scientists trying to recreate the human brain.

The simulation hypothesis is very old. It isn't beholden to or shaped by just the media. Just imagination. Science and philosophy are the foundations of it. Another form of questioning reality which humanity has always done.


I mean benchmark as in what we know and think humans are capable of in 2017 based on what we have currently in computing technology. I said simulated to mean the simulated reality we're talking about presently. And I didn't mean the media, I meant media - books, movies, music, whatever your preferred medium is. There's a reason The Matrix is referenced so much when simulated realities come up.


would it be wrong to say that the brain is the most complex thing in the universe?


It's gotta be pretty high up there. Loud got me right and I'm sitting here wondering what consciousness is and why I can hear my thoughts watching South Park bugging myself out :lol:
 
Last edited:
Why run an unimportant simulation at all then?


Why not? People do it in video games every day. The Sims has been active since 2000.
Why are you assuming that it's unimportant to the ppl who do it everyday? :lol:

That example shows that the game does hold importance to the ppl who take part.

I will point out though The Sims video game and a simulation duplicating reality is not the same thing at all.


There are more theories than just post-human civilization running a simulation.
I'm specifically talking about the simulation argument/theory.

Which theory are you talking about?

I'm not talking about specifically Elon's idea of simulated reality.
I'm not talking about what Elon said in that vid at all. I've already forgotten what he said while talking over dude that asked and bringing up how he had to ban the discussion in hot tubs. I mean he didn't even really say much. Everything I'm talking about is based on philosophy courses I took and discussions with professors and philosophers.

A simulation itself is imitation of real world processes or systems. A computer could be running the supposed simulation for all we know.
That doesn't change anything I've said.

Dives right back in to what I said about if this is a simulation we wouldn't be able to create a simulation depending on the energy source for the computer running the simulation program.


Relevance was you bringing up reality having an endless energy source.
I didn't say reality had an endless energy source. I said the simulation would need something like that for the simulation to create a simulation within itself.

The Matrix was a simulation, simulated reality specifically.
You're kinda conflating the movie with the simulation argument. The simulation argument isn't stating that you or I are real human beings experiencing a simulation. All ppl within the simulation are a part of the program and not real. The simulation is being observed from without.


Yes I agree. Going back to the previous point, this is why if we are being simmed then the endless energy wouldn't be necessary. 1000 sim years could be 11 real time seconds. Again to reference the Sims, days pass at a far different rate and you can even speed up time.
You're missing my point.

Time is irrelevant to what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the energy needed to run the simulation. So if this is a simulation you would need twice as much energy to run another simulation within the simulation.

It doesn't matter if a million years in the simulation is have a second in actual reality. The issue of energy needed is still present.

I can concede this point but I still feel Clarke's third applies.
I don't see what advanced technology appearing to be like magic to a person ignorant of how that technology works has any meaning to the simulation argument.

Before Clark, many have pointed out that advancements in science and technology can appear to be magic to less advanced civilizations. Its magic until it's explained. Don't see the correlation.


I mean benchmark as in what we know and think humans are capable of in 2017 based on what we have currently in computing technology.
I got that.

Even if you want to go to the scenario where a process that is unknown and can not be explained to create simulated reality the issue of creating more simulated realities within them are still present and unaddressed.

And I didn't mean the media, I meant media - books, movies, music, whatever your preferred medium is.
All I'm saying is questioning reality existed before that.

Before simulated realities there was the dream argument and the philosopher Zhuangzi.

There's a reason The Matrix is referenced so much when simulated realities come up.
That's cuz it's a popular movie that easily explains a certain approach to the topic of simulated realities to the laymen.

Same way Fight Club makes it easier to understand split/multiple personalities.
 
Last edited:
think about this tho...

when we are asleep and we dream....we are basically creating a whole universe...world, with experiences, people, emotions, and it all looks and feels real.

Now do we create that? or are we just perceiving it like we perceive the world when we are awake? Are we making that? or is it being made for us?


so either we are simulating a world when we are asleep, or we are viewing a simulation of a world when we are asleep.

we do that when we are ASLEEP. So what can we do when our brain is fully active and we are AWAKE

:nerd:

why is the universal speed limit so low that almost none of the universe needs to be simulated in any real detail.

:nerd:
 
Last edited:
That's only considerable if you can't tell the difference between your dreams and when you're awake.

Very few ppl dream in such vivid detail that everything external of them behaves and acts as normally as when they're awake.
 
I'm gonna need to figure out why sex in my dreams feel way better than it does in real life. Those "orgasms" feel like an out of body experience.
 
i need new dreams...my ***** be lame af

last night i was stuck on top of a glass ledge high af.  i hate heights. 

weird thing was after being scared i realized i was dreaming and woke myself up 
nerd.gif
 
 
Last edited:
i need new dreams...my ***** be lame af

last night i was stuck on top of a glass ledge high af.  i hate heights. 
weird thing was after being scared i realized i was dreaming and woke myself up :nerd:  

Doesn't happen to me often at all but when it does :wow:

The feelings/sensations are absolutely insane

Blows my mind how when I'm in a certain state of sleep I can have such a heightened sexual or emotional feelings to a fictional person in my brain but in "real life" I can never reach those levels.

Makes me question life on some real ****
 
i need new dreams...my ***** be lame af

last night i was stuck on top of a glass ledge high af.  i hate heights. 
weird thing was after being scared i realized i was dreaming and woke myself up :nerd:  

I've had one specific dream in my life, that when I woke up, I wasn't sure what reality I was in... My dream was so very specific to the world and all the little things... Long story short, in my dream I was in an accident and in a coma for a number of years, and when I woke up from coma, everything was the same, but different... Just in the way of you jumped 5 years in the future... Sane world, new things; cars, video format, president, movie stars, ect... I spent days in the dream, like full days...

It was so very weird to wake up from that dream... I've never felt so disconnected from what real is... I've experienced vivid dreams since, but nothing to that nature... I hope to experience that type of dream again...
.
 
 
Originally Posted by KingFoamNYC 

Blows my mind how when I'm in a certain state of sleep I can have such a heightened sexual or emotional feelings to a fictional person in my brain but in "real life" I can never reach those levels.
this.

also I keep dreaming of this girl (about 5-6 dreams now) it's the same girl but her face is always not there. same voice, same everything but in my dreams she is always turned around or we're in a situation where I'm not looking at her and I have this deep feeling of love after waking up. 

I don't eem love my gf this much 
indifferent.gif
 
Last edited:
I've had one specific dream in my life, that when I woke up, I wasn't sure what reality I was in... My dream was so very specific to the world and all the little things... Long story short, in my dream I was in an accident and in a coma for a number of years, and when I woke up from coma, everything was the same, but different... Just in the way of you jumped 5 years in the future... Sane world, new things; cars, video format, president, movie stars, ect... I spent days in the dream, like full days...

It was so very weird to wake up from that dream... I've never felt so disconnected from what real is... I've experienced vivid dreams since, but nothing to that nature... I hope to experience that type of dream again...
.
lol this reminds me of a popular Chinese story...

basically Zhuangzi was sleeping and he dreamt that he was a butterfly... when he woke up, he was confused and asked himself,

am I Zhuangzi who dreamt he was a butterfly, or am I a butterfly dreaming that im Zhuangzi..

Obviously I summarized the story but yea...

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Zhuangzi
 
Last edited:
this.

also I keep dreaming of this girl (about 5-6 dreams now) it's the same girl but her face is always not there. same voice, same everything but in my dreams she is always turned around or we're in a situation where I'm not looking at her and I have this deep feeling of love after waking up. 
I don't eem love my gf this much :stoneface:

**** crazy bro. I've had the same dream about a shorty but I actually saw her face. Bad ***** too :smh: woke up mad af
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom