Official 2017 Boxing Thread: 12/16 - Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux HBO

Who will be the winner of Terence Crawford vs. Julius Indongo fight?

  • Crawford

    Votes: 16 88.9%
  • Indongo

    Votes: 2 11.1%

  • Total voters
    18
  • Poll closed .
I don't like throwing out the word "robbery," but Jacobs was robbed. I'm a GGG fan, but don't want to see him getting gifted wins.
 
It can't be a robbery if the fight could've gone either way. I think the knockdown was the deciding factor here, but my goodness Jacobs fought a great fight.
 
Jacobs fought a good fight, a great fight, but what did he do to win a decision over a champion??? Sorry, but fighting 50/50 against a champ and getting knocked down in a round does not get you a decision. And to his credit Jacobs understands that he needed to do more to win the fight.
 
Jacobs fought a good fight, a great fight, but what did he do to win a decision over a champion??? Sorry, but fighting 50/50 against a champ and getting knocked down in a round does not get you a decision. And to his credit Jacobs understands that he needed to do more to win the fight.

I hate this stupid *** argument people make. In boxing, you win if you won more rounds. Jacobs clearly won more rounds. If you can't see that you shouldn't be watching boxing.
 
Jacobs fought a good fight, a great fight, but what did he do to win a decision over a champion??? Sorry, but fighting 50/50 against a champ and getting knocked down in a round does not get you a decision. And to his credit Jacobs understands that he needed to do more to win the fight.
Jacobs was more active, landing the cleaner power shots...well landing the cleaner shots overall. Won more rounds also.
 
Last edited:
Jacobs fought a good fight, a great fight, but what did he do to win a decision over a champion??? Sorry, but fighting 50/50 against a champ and getting knocked down in a round does not get you a decision. And to his credit Jacobs understands that he needed to do more to win the fight.
I don't agree with unwritten rules but I agree [emoji]128175[/emoji] this is what it is and how it is. Everybody knows this. Knock him out, knock him down and don't get knocked down or lose
 
Last edited:
Jacobs fought a good fight, a great fight, but what did he do to win a decision over a champion??? Sorry, but fighting 50/50 against a champ and getting knocked down in a round does not get you a decision. And to his credit Jacobs understands that he needed to do more to win the fight.
Jacobs was more active, landing the cleaner power shots...well landing the cleaner shots overall. Won more rounds also.

Dudes always have this weird thing about having to knockout or knock down a champion to win. That's not the criteria they claim to follow though. So it's wrong. But great fight either way.
 
It's true though. You have to be very biased or not know anything about boxing to think triple g won that fight. And for him to win unanimous is disgusting.
 
I hate this stupid *** argument people make. In boxing, you win if you won more rounds. Jacobs clearly won more rounds. If you can't see that you shouldn't be watching boxing.


Seriously. I don't even respond to that kinda dumb ****. Either you won more rounds or you didn't. Jacobs clearly won by a decent margin tonight
 
I hate this stupid *** argument people make. In boxing, you win if you won more rounds. Jacobs clearly won more rounds. If you can't see that you shouldn't be watching boxing.

Most of those rounds were 50/50. And GGG had the knockdown. So....

There were 50/50 but most of them were clearly won by Jacobs outboxing him. A few flurries a round don't win rounds for me. This fight was an easy fight to score.
 
Back
Top Bottom