Study Finds White Youth Are More Likely To Abuse Hard Drugs Than Black Youth / Canada to Legalize MJ

18,115
11,769
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
[h1]A racist stereotype is shattered: Study finds white youth are more likely to abuse hard drugs than black youth[/h1]
The 12-year study highlights the incongruence between drug use and incarceration rates along racial lines
ROBIN SCHERALTERNET WEDNESDAY, APR 6, 2016 09:56 PM CDT

meth_addiction_drugs-e1457561872800-620x412.jpg


By now we can all agree that the real target of Reagan’s enduring war on drugs was never drugs, it was African Americans. But if rising incarceration rates among black youth or the utter failure to curtail drug use is not enough proof, perhaps a new study from Northwestern University on racial differences among drug users will do the trick.

According to the study’s findings recently published in the American Journal of Public Health, abuse and dependence on “hard drugs” (opiates, amphetamine, etc.) are “less common among delinquent African American youth than those who are non-Hispanic white.”

The study was conducted over the course of 12 years and interviewed 1,829 youth (1,172 males and 657 females between the ages of 10 to 18) who were detained at Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center in Chicago between 1995 and 1998.

Researchers interviewed the participants in the study up to nine times through the course of their 20s. In that time, findings revealed that the odds of non-Hispanic white youths using cocaine were 30 times higher than African Americans. Hispanic participants trailed slightly behind, showing 20 times the odds of cocaine use compared to their African-American brethren.

“Those findings are striking considering the widely accepted stereotype of African Americans as the most prevalent abusers of ‘hard drugs,'” said senior author of the study Linda A. Teplin, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

Most notably, the findings of the study highlight the incongruity between drug use and incarceration rates along racial lines. According to estimated figures from the U.S. Department of Justice, of the males born in 2001, one in three African Americans and one in six Hispanics will be incarcerated at some point during their lifetimes. By contrast for Caucasians, that number is one in 17.

“Our findings add to the growing debate on how the war on drugs has affected African Americans,” said Teplin. “We found that African Americans are less likely than other racial/ethnic groups to abuse hard drugs. Yet African Americans are disproportionately incarcerated for drug crimes.”

Unsurprisingly, marijuana was the most commonly used drug across all ethnicities. As the participants reached their late 20s, however, alcohol seemed to take over as the substance of abuse.

http://www.salon.com/2016/04/06/thi...to_abuse_hard_drugs_than_black_youth_partner/
i for one am shocked

thoughts? 
nerd.gif
 
 
Last edited:
May sound kinda ignorant, but we don't need no damn study to realize this. :lol:
 
Yeah no surprise here.

As part of my recent work, I've been working with some policy professionals in DC to reform marijuana laws. If anyone is interested in getting involved with our work, feel free to PM me. You can contribute in more ways than you think.

The most sensible policy recommendations would be:

  • Decriminalize drug possession, removing a major cause of arrest and incarceration of primarily people of color, helping more people receive drug treatment and redirecting law enforcement resources to prevent serious and violent crime.
  • Eliminate policies that result in disproportionate arrest and incarceration rates by changing police practices, rolling back harsh mandatory minimum sentences, and repealing sentencing disparities.
  • End policies that exclude people with a record of arrest or conviction from key rights and opportunities. These include barriers to voting, employment, public housing and other public assistance, loans, financial aid and child custody.

President Richard Nixon launched the war on drugs in the early 1970s, and about 10 years later President Ronald Reagan strengthened the effort. These stricter drug policies led to a 500 percent increase in incarceration. Absolutely ridiculous. The War on Drug is definitely a major factor affecting incarceration rates, but it's not the only factor. Very complex issue when you have to consider violent offenders. Anyway look at this chart below.

View media item 2403300
We MUST abandon this nonsensical war on drugs. The only problem is that someone needs to fill the prisons. So we also have to weed out the corruption that's keeping the industrial prison complex in place. The US locks people up at a higher rate than any other country. So much for land of the free :rolleyes
 
Last edited:
this is facts. Last year, one of my peoples lost his boy cause he had too much special K and I'm not talking about the cereal.
 
Yeah no surprise here.

As part of my recent work, I've been working with some policy professionals in DC to reform marijuana laws. If anyone is interested in getting involved with our work, feel free to PM me. You can contribute in more ways than you think.

The most sensible policy recommendations would be:
  • Decriminalize drug possession, removing a major cause of arrest and incarceration of primarily people of color, helping more people receive drug treatment and redirecting law enforcement resources to prevent serious and violent crime.
  • Eliminate policies that result in disproportionate arrest and incarceration rates by changing police practices, rolling back harsh mandatory minimum sentences, and repealing sentencing disparities.
  • End policies that exclude people with a record of arrest or conviction from key rights and opportunities. These include barriers to voting, employment, public housing and other public assistance, loans, financial aid and child custody.
President Richard Nixon launched the war on drugs in the early 1970s, and about 10 years later President Ronald Reagan strengthened the effort. These stricter drug policies led to a 500 percent increase in incarceration. Absolutely ridiculous. The War on Drug is definitely a major factor affecting incarceration rates, but it's not the only factor. Very complex issue when you have to consider violent offenders. Anyway look at this chart below.



We MUST abandon this nonsensical war on drugs. The only problem is that someone needs to fill the prisons. So we also have to weed out the corruption that's keeping the industrial prison complex in place. The US locks people up at a higher rate than any other country. So much for land of the free
eyes.gif
Excellent and noble work you are doing.

Also NOBODY want to discuss the necessity to consolidate prisons and layoff police....Nobody wants to say it, but with the exception of a few major cities we are severely overstaffed , and drug arrests are used to justify a lot of officers being employed.
 
Last edited:
I think this is known, just convenient cognitive dissonance on the dominant society's part. Think of the get down where they're getting drunk and doing hard drugs at the ivy league party but to them Shaolin is the animal.
 
Last edited:
Yeah no surprise here.


As part of my recent work, I've been working with some policy professionals in DC to reform marijuana laws. If anyone is interested in getting involved with our work, feel free to PM me. You can contribute in more ways than you think.


The most sensible policy recommendations would be:
  • Decriminalize drug possession, removing a major cause of arrest and incarceration of primarily people of color, helping more people receive drug treatment and redirecting law enforcement resources to prevent serious and violent crime.
  • Eliminate policies that result in disproportionate arrest and incarceration rates by changing police practices, rolling back harsh mandatory minimum sentences, and repealing sentencing disparities.
  • End policies that exclude people with a record of arrest or conviction from key rights and opportunities. These include barriers to voting, employment, public housing and other public assistance, loans, financial aid and child custody.


President Richard Nixon launched the war on drugs in the early 1970s, and about 10 years later President Ronald Reagan strengthened the effort. These stricter drug policies led to a 500 percent increase in incarceration. Absolutely ridiculous. The War on Drug is definitely a major factor affecting incarceration rates, but it's not the only factor. Very complex issue when you have to consider violent offenders. Anyway look at this chart below.

View media item 2403300


We MUST abandon this nonsensical war on drugs. The only problem is that someone needs to fill the prisons. So we also have to weed out the corruption that's keeping the industrial prison complex in place. The US locks people up at a higher rate than any other country. So much for land of the free :rolleyes


Excellent and noble work you are doing.

Also NOBODY want to discuss the necessity to consolidate prisons and layoff police....Nobody wants to say it, but with the exception of a few major cities we are severely overstaffed , and drug arrests are used to justify a lot of officers being employed.
Florida is an exception. Some counties are desperate for staffing and the Highway Patrol needs help.
 
just convenient cognitive dissonance on the dominant society's part.

This is changing though. And you can do your part by contacting your elected officials and letting them know what you want from them.

In Colorado, for example, the dominant society is now profiting more from marijuana tax revenue than it is from the war on drugs. Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper’s has recently backtracked on his initial opposition to legalization for a couple reasons:

  • It's what his constituents want and to stay elected and in good standing with the people he governs he better listen to their demands.
  • The obvious tax revenue that lends better infrastructure to Colorado citizens. The extra revenue is being used for good causes like education, infrastructure improvements, etc... Not to build more jails.
  • Reduction in crime.

Great article here if you're interested in reading more about what's going on in CO.

Legal Cannabis States' Governors Now Support Legalization Thanks to Massive Tax Revenue

With over $1 billion in tax revenue on the line, governors across the country are starting to warm up to legalized cannabis.

If you’ve been following recent news pertaining to the cannabis industry, you might have noticed a trend in states with recreational legislation in place. From Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper’s recent backtracking on his initial opposition to legalization, to Washington Gov. Jay Inslee vowing to fight the Donald Trump administration if the federal government disrupts his state’s booming market, politicians are suddenly sticking up for marijuana.

This change of heart seems to stem from the massive amount of tax revenue that cannabis has created across the U.S. A report released by New Frontier Data shows that states with legalized marijuana are poised to generate around $655 million in tax revenue from retail sales in 2017. Of which $559 million will come from cannabis taxes alone.

While this enormous figure is certainly nothing to scoff at, the report goes even further in estimating that total tax revenues in states with legalization will reach around $1.8 billion, with $1.4 billion stemming from cannabis-related taxes. When you couple this mountain of money with the fact that Trump is arranging budget cuts to a wide range of areas, governors and other politicians are finally starting to see the green light at the end of the tunnel.

With critical programs like Medicaid and passenger train services at risk of being cut, state officials will likely turn to this tax revenue to help keep these resources afloat. Luckily, recreational cannabis has created much more money for these states than anticipated.

For example, Colorado saw a 57.2% increase in total marijuana taxes collected in the 2016-17 fiscal year, up from the 2015-16 fiscal year. The state garnered $119 million in taxes as of January for its year-to-date fiscal year, an undeniable goldmine compared to the $38 million in revenue collected from alcohol taxes.

Washington is positioned to see a 25% increase from $185 million to $233 million, while California’s proposed 15% tax rate cannabis is expected to generate a whopping $1 billion once recreational legalization is fully in effect.

While state governors are developing a growing dependence on cannabis-related taxes, polls conducted across the nation show unarguable support for widespread legalization. At the end of the day, the constituents who are in need of these endangered social safety nets won’t take kindly higher taxes or sales prices, but they still expect these services to stay in place.

Luckily, states with cannabis legalization have stumbled upon a growing revenue stream that could allow them to maintain these programs without jeopardizing the wellbeing of those who need them the most.

https://www.merryjane.com/news/state-governors-support-cannabis-tax-revenue

Had a policy meeting yesterday and we were all discussing this. Now that the old white men are benefiting from legal cannabis, they are suddenly changing their mind. I think these guys are starting to realize it's in their best interest reform marijuana now. Before they were making political and financial gains through racist laws. Now these laws are being repealed, arrests based on discrimination is declining, and EVEN MORE MONEY is coming in than before. When you can make your constituents happy and make money at the same time, instead of making your money by being corrupt and supporting war on drugs and prison industrial complex...yeah, the reeferlution will be televised :pimp:

Ironically though, I was recently denied a bank account with Industrial Bank (black-owned bank in the DMV), due to my affiliation with marijuana related entities. Had a long conversation with the manager after that. They wanted to take me in the state of DC, but it's not worth the federal risk they take. I could understand their apprehension but it was a shame. They said I wasn't the first professional with a real business they had to turn away, unfortunately. People are working to fix this though.

I know I'm talking a lot about cannabis when the thread is about hard drugs, but, I think if the nation starts to handle cannabis realistically and responsibly it will create a domino effect with the other drugs. I think the focus on hard drugs should be education and treatment rather than imprisonment. For cannabis, just legalize and tax it. In the 1960s 20% of the population approved of cannabis. It's more than 60% of the population approving of it today.
 
Last edited:
Aren't you the same guy that's always crying about no one starting new threads? And let you tell it you neither black nor white so move along amigo. Nobody forcing you to participate in the thread.
 
Back
Top Bottom