2017 NBA Playoffs Thread - CLE @ BOS Game 5 on TNT

Status
Not open for further replies.
You dont just get a sig because you're good at what you do. Alot of players are good at what they do.

Also im pretty sure Nike only gives out a very limited amount of Sigs so they dont saturate their own market.

And im sure Giannis is #1 on the list for that very limited spot with an international player finally being as marketable as he will be. Nike probably been waiting for someone like Giannis forever.
Except, I said Draymond is great at what he does. Again, doesn't necessarily have to be a sig. But something along the lines of what those dudes I listed got.
 
What you mean? I don't get it. I just answered you.

Those 3 teams lost back 2 back Finals. And they were all #1 seeds.
they werent better teams then the team they lost to..

2011 heat were the better team. 2016 warriors were the better team . 06 mavs were better then the heat etc etc 
 
Last edited:
What you mean? I don't get it. I just answered you.


Those 3 teams lost back 2 back Finals. And they were all #1 seeds.
they werent better teams then the team they lost to..

2011 heat were the better team. 2016 warriors were the better team . 06 mavs were better then the heat etc etc 

"Better" is subjective. They were still #1 seeds in their conference and lost the Finals back to back.
 
Air Drays could be the new Timbs. You catch a group of dudes wearing em and you know you getting stomped out
 
LeBron didn't deserve his Nike contract coming out of high school, but Draymond should have a sig shoe. :rofl: :rofl:
 
The reason he didn't call a timeout was he didn't want Lue to be able to take Love out for defense

So what? There was 53 seconds left and the Cavs didn't have a time out. If Lue took out Love, there was no way for him to put him back into the game for offense unless there was a foul (GS was in the bonus) or timeout called.

Kerr should've called time out.

What you mean? I don't get it. I just answered you.

Those 3 teams lost back 2 back Finals. And they were all #1 seeds.

What? No man. WTF are you talking about?

Utah and Chicago had the same record, New Jersey was the #1 seed, but they had 6 less wins than the Lakers, and the 04's Lakers were the better team and lost. But the year after the Spurs beat the Pistons.

Get what I'm saying?

I don't think there has ever been a time in the NBA where the best team in the NBA Finals two years in a row.
 
Last edited:
You honestly couldn't have drawn up a better play than the 2X MVP and reigning scoring champ getting an ISO on Kevin love. Curry honestly just choked.
 
Last edited:
You honestly couldn't have drawn up a better play than the 2X MVP and reigning scoring champ getting an ISO on Kevin love. Curry honestly just choked.

No way man.

Curry was already hobbled and couldn't even get past TT out in the perimeter when he was leaving bigs as BBQ chicken the entire season before the slip.

He took an AWFUL shot.

Look at the possession for yourself
 
The reason he didn't call a timeout was he didn't want Lue to be able to take Love out for defense

So what? There was 53 seconds left and the Cavs didn't have a time out. If Lue took out Love, there was no way for him to put him back into the game for offense unless there was a foul (GS was in the bonus) or timeout called.

Kerr should've called time out.

What you mean? I don't get it. I just answered you.

Those 3 teams lost back 2 back Finals. And they were all #1 seeds.

What? No man. WTF are you talking about?

Utah and Chicago had the same record, New Jersey was the #1 seed, but they had 6 less wins than the Lakers, and the 04's Lakers were the better team and lost. But the year after the Spurs beat the Pistons.

Get what I'm saying?

I don't think there has ever been a time in the NBA where the best team in the NBA Finals two years in a row.

Like I said man, the term "better" is subjective. The "better" team usually wins PERIOD.

Like the Lakers beating the Kings, Warriors beating Mavericks, Celtics beating Cavs, Cavs beating Warriors... ect.

"Better" record does not mean "better" team.
 
Last edited:
No doubt it was an awful shot.

What I'm saying is he could've easily beat Love off the dribble hurt or not and would've still had enough time to get the ball back without fouling. They got the switch with 18 seconds on the shot clock and 42 on the game clock.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom