Ask a Cop whatever.....

want to give these cops some serious questions? 

watch "the seven five" on netflix before asking anything. 
 
Been out for a bit so I'll be working on catching up.

So there is this cop that lives in my building, there is a space on the street that says NO STANDING space big enough for 1 car between two driveways, however he's treated this like his personal parking space 7 days a week 24 hours a day, when the regular peeps like myself have to pay the building for a space or drive around searching for a space, my question is, if I see that space open and park there, will I get a ticket? And if I do and have prove that this cop has been parking there for over a year as he sees fit and gone untouched, what will a judge tells me when I debate the ticket? I didn't know cops and their civil cars were immune to traffic laws...

Will you get a ticket? Depends how bad somebody wants to write a parking citation. I personally don't write them unless it's a real hazard or somebody complains about it. Can't say what the judge will tell you. I've gotten traffic tickets as a cop and if anything, I especially can't defend them.

Complain about it. Squeaky wheel gets the grease.
 
Natural law is as old as time and memorial. Look into it.

Non aggression principle

Self defense principle

Man made laws like "don't steal" are simply redundant.

Any action taken that doesn't result in the harm or violation of another sentient being is a human right.

Therefore it is immoral for anyone to state that it's "illegal" for anyone to partake in an activity such as doing coke for example, weather or not it's harmful to the person doing it is not another's call to make. We all claim ownership of ourselves and our bodies that's a fact that many fail to realize. So by telling someone "you can't put this in your body" you're staking claim and ownership over that persons body which is a form of SLAVERY if we're being honest with ourselves.

THERE ARE LAWS WE NEED TO ABIDE BY. Like I said more than 90% aren't even aware of them.

Natural law sadly isn't natural for everybody.

I agree with the whole drugs thing. If you wanna do it to yourself then go ahead. In the confines of your own home have at it. As long as it doesn't cause you to run outside and act a fool in public then have at it.
 
can cops search someone personal info without a warrant or a crime ?

are cops allowed to be friends with criminals?

are cops allowed to have criminals commit crimes for them for profit?

what would happen if a cop knew about a criminal scheme going on and did not tell anyone?

what would happen if  there is proof  a cop knew about convicts plotting to rob a bank and did not tell anyone?

1. Yes. On our computers we can look up driver license info (so birthday and address generally), driving history, past bookings etc.

2. Yes

3. No (but I'm sure it's happened)

4. Can't say. Easy answer is the scheme would go on as its already happening.

5. I would assume they'd be fired.
 
OP what are your thoughts on the developing situation with the murder of Jordan Edwards by a ***** with a badge?

What do you think the outcome will be, and can you explain what the internal review process is lIke?

Sounds like a bad shoot to me. The cop first said he shot because the car was reversing toward him "in an aggressive manner." Then they try to do damage control saying he mis-spoke and the car was actually driving away.

From what I have read the cop turned himself in but then bailed out. He should go to jail for what he did but of course I can't say. I've never been called into internal affairs before so I can't say what the process is. From people I've spoken with that have been in shooting though, I know you're immediately met at the station by pretty much all of your higher ups and the DA.
 
How does OP feel about the cops who murdered Alton Sterling not being charged? 

They should have been. Of course I wasn't there and don't know the exact details but it should have gone something more like this. Seeing the gun and having him reach for the gun are two completely different things but what from what I saw, I thought they were in control and pulled their guns prematurely.


(Don't know the context of this video either. Just referencing the actual taking away of the handgun, nothing else)
 
I go to jail for shooting a fleeing intruder.

They get paid vacation

Fleeing intruders are tricky. Technically, once the threat is gone then you're not supposed to shoot someone that say, just broke into your house. I learned about this long before I was law enforcement. I get it that in a normal situation the fear is still going to be there but yeah, if dude is trying to run out your front door then it sucks, but you're supposed to let them go or take them into custody some other way.
 
From my experience alot of you Asian police are extremely biased toward helping your Asian communities letting fellow asians off especially asian mischievous youth because you know how thier parents are about family honor and discipline you would rather take them to thier parents and not to central booking  but meanwhile coming down hard on the black communities you patrol. Booking our youth and putting them in the system ie juvenile hall which destroys thier minds worst.

I feel you asian police shouldn't be patrolling our communities either because we are not of the same logic and cultures.

Can I ask what region you live in? Never let anybody go because they're asian.

And I agree that we are not completely of the same culture, but what is the difference in the logic that you're talking about?
 
Read this book then tell me how you feel. Very short read.

View media item 2417394
http://www.mensenrechten.org/wp-con...-dangerous-superstition-larken-rose-20111.pdf

I've also got about 6 other books that prove your occupation is immoral

I've only read through "Part I" but it's a good read so far. Definitely a lot to think about and I see the author's perspective. He's very thorough and explains his viewpoints well. Whatever company published that though needs to hire a new editor.

How do I feel so far? I see you guys share the same viewpoints on government and authority in that they are only "imagined" to have the authority that they have because the vast majority of people buy into it. They were taught to have that mindset growing up and are afraid to even think that anything else can be right or correct. The examples and analogies given are good and make sense except, for example, the one where he states the "government" has "laws" for taxing people for their work or where they live being the same as a neighborhood gang taxing shop owners a fee of their own for operating on their turf. How he says the former is "accepted" because it falls along the lines of the peoples misguided beliefs in the "government," while the latter is a "crime" because it is a gang thats carrying it out. I understand it's a similar concept, but I disagree with his viewpoint. I also want to say some of his claims are common sense but common sense isn't the same for everybody. Like when he talks about how the "government" doesn't do everything for its people because everybody would have to want the exact same thing. Waste of a paragraph.

Good read overall and I'll hit the rest of it when I get time.

Question for you though. I saw in one of your posts that you say some laws are straight heinous and cruel. Can you give me an example of one or two?
 
I've only read through "Part I" but it's a good read so far. Definitely a lot to think about and I see the author's perspective. He's very thorough and explains his viewpoints well. Whatever company published that though needs to hire a new editor.

How do I feel so far? I see you guys share the same viewpoints on government and authority in that they are only "imagined" to have the authority that they have because the vast majority of people buy into it. They were taught to have that mindset growing up and are afraid to even think that anything else can be right or correct. The examples and analogies given are good and make sense except, for example, the one where he states the "government" has "laws" for taxing people for their work or where they live beings the same as a neighborhood gang taxing shop owners a fee of their own for operating on their turf. How he says the former is "accepted" because it falls along the lines of the peoples misguided beliefs in the "government," while the latter is a "crime" because it is a gang thats carrying it out. I understand it's a similar concept, but I disagree with his viewpoint. I also want to say some of his claims are common sense but common sense isn't the same for everybody. Like when he talks about how the "government" doesn't do everything for its people because everybody would have to want the exact same thing. Waste of a paragraph.

Good read overall and I'll hit the rest of it when I get time.

Question for you though. I saw in one of your posts that you say some laws are straight heinous and cruel. Can you give me an example of one or two?

Easy. Any drug law. I'll elaborate on the example I gave on cocaine. Not only can nobody tell you that you can't do it but nobody can tell you what amount you can possess or distribute. First of all you're not forcing or coercing anyone to purchase it from you. They're doing it by choice under their own volition and will get it for themselves whether you're there to provide it or not. And if you wanna go deep into it the government provides drugs at the end of the day but that's a whole nother thread. Now if a person excercises poor judgment and partakes in or overdoses on a substance that causes them to go out and violate or harm another sentient being then they have to suffer the repercussions of their actions. Another example would be any jurisdictional law i.e. I can carry an extended magazine in region A freely but if I have that same clip in region B I can be put in a cage for it. It's stupid as hell.

Last question for you, the government enforces martial law. You as a police officer are given strict orders to respond with deadly force to any civilian regardless of age, sex, etc. refusing to go inside their home or vacate public areas. Are you gonna "do your job" and "follow orders" by trampling all over everyone's human rights and becoming an agent of oppression (even more so) in order to continue to collect your check and because daddy told you to? What is the line for you? What's it gonna take for you to wake up and realize you're part of the problem?
 
Last edited:
Fleeing intruders are tricky. Technically, once the threat is gone then you're not supposed to shoot someone that say, just broke into your house. I learned about this long before I was law enforcement. I get it that in a normal situation the fear is still going to be there but yeah, if dude is trying to run out your front door then it sucks, but you're supposed to let them go or take them into custody some other way.

You guys kill unarmed fleeing people all day.

Hell, you kill children who have hulk like strength in broad daylight out of "fear"

You have a gun. You're free from any consequence.

What exactly does an unarmed person do to present "fear"
 
 
Why do cops ask "where are you going/headed" when they pull you over?
its called being passive aggressive. their objective is to piss you off so when they lock you up for some petty *** **** its your fault
 
Back
Top Bottom