- 31,965
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
What is there to like about chad Kelly? Seriously
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What is there to like about chad Kelly? Seriously
Tell'em Why Barnett is the goods tho, srslyWhat is there to like about chad Kelly? Seriously
Derek Barnett should be good. I feel like he's a fringe All-pro caliber guy or just a stalwart contributor that you plug in for years.
My thought with the Sidney Jones pick was that he would be at full health two seasons from now. Philly competing next year will be great and welcomed (assuming I'm a fan), but if I were in that front office, I would feel great about what two seasons from now looks like when Wentz and co. is in year 3 and that defense has been built to a point where Sidney Jones is like a surplus that will carry over to the 2018 draft class.
Donnel Pumphrey was great in college, so I'm curious how he pans out in the NFL and how he pans out may come down to how he's used, but he can bee an asset. It doesn't hurt that he's under Sproles' tutelage.
What is there to like about chad Kelly? Seriously
He's about to be a boon to that Colorado economy
wow I forgot about him, had to be some off the field stuffI can't (but at the same time I can) believe that Malachi Dupre fell to the 7th round.
Hell of a team to fall too though, might work out well for him.
He was absolutely more consistently productive against good competition than Myles...people either say Barnett is right there with Garrett or they don't see it, I wasn't sure myself but when I watched highlights of him giving Lamery Tunsil all he could handle, I am in on him
so disappointed with this draft man, feel like we drafted strictly on depth...on 1 side thats good thing but i dont feel like nobody will be dynamic except maybe Samuel.
If only he was still the coach.put some respect on kubiaks name
The Chicago Bears had a strange approach to the 2017 draft. Nothing was more confusing than their decision to sacrifice three picks to move up one spot, from No. 3 to No. 2, in a reach to get North Carolina quarterback Mitchell Trubisky.
Trubisky has the tools to develop into a viable NFL starter, but the Bears are paying Mike Glennon $18.5 million dollars to start this year. It was hasty to sacrifice additional picks to move up to draft another quarterback when the Bears have glaring needs elsewhere on the roster.
Worse, the Bears probably didn’t need to trade up to get Trubisky at all. He would have been there waiting for them with the third overall pick on Thursday night.
The MMQB’s Peter King was in San Francisco’s war room and witnessed the Niners’ end of that transaction.
Prior to the draft, the Niners had floated the possibility of selecting Trubisky second overall. We said at the time it looked like a smokescreen, and that’s exactly what it turned out to be.
The top three players on the Niners’ draft board were Myles Garrett, who the Browns ended up taking with the first overall pick, Solomon Thomas, and Reuben Foster. 49ers general manager John Lynch knew early Thursday that the Browns were most likely going to take Garrett with the first pick.
Before the draft, the Bears and Niners reached a tentative agreement to make a trade if the player the Bears wanted was still on the board after Cleveland picked. Lynch thought Chicago wanted Thomas, and was comfortable with taking Foster with the third pick. 49ers’ chief strategy officer, Paraag Marathe, felt confident the Bears were targeting Trubisky when they called about trading up.
“Then why’d they go get [free-agent quarterback Mike] Glennon?” general manager John Lynch asked.
It’s the same question a lot of people are asking ... maybe even Bears head coach John Fox. He reportedly didn’t know the team was trading up for Trubisky, and the deal may have exposed rifts in Chicago’s front office.
"We don't know what the hell they were doing," an unnamed team executive told CBS Sports’ Jason LaCanfora. "It's all anyone is talking about. It's really bad between Pace and Fox. Fox is fuming about being left in the dark on the trade (for Trubisky). I don't know anyone who likes their draft.”
Maybe the Trubisky pick will surprise us and work out just fine for Chicago. Right now, it feels like the Bears don’t really know what they’re doing.
Nope nope nope...idk what the hell we doing. i guess the talk will be Cam using more quick screens and dump downs now. im lost man.
so disappointed with this draft man, feel like we drafted strictly on depth...on 1 side thats good thing but i dont feel like nobody will be dynamic except maybe Samuel.
Did y'all change offensive coaches or change up GM or scouts?
Just seemed like y'all changed up philosophy on what y'all are looking for on O
bears need trubisky to be aaron rodgers...until then we're the laughing stock of the league
a guy who can't overcome 1pt deficits in the 4th quarter against teams .500 and better? i'd expect more from #2 overall
Thought Steelers should've drafted a DL early on