Official 2017 NBA Offseason Thread: Media Days begin

Status
Not open for further replies.
See there you go speculating again :lol:. First it was 'magic said Ingram is the only touchable' but now that includes Nance too because..you want it to? Reports that the Lakers were not only open to trading JC but actively looking for deals and now he's valued over Russell and Randle because your agenda says so? [emoji]129300[/emoji]

At least keep it consistent..
 
Last edited:
leemelone said:
See there you go speculating again
laugh.gif
. First it was 'magic said Ingram is the only touchable' but now that includes Nance because..you want it to? Reports that the Lakers were not only open to trading JC but actively looking for deals and now he's valued over Russell and Randle Becca your agenda says so? [emoji]129300[/emoji]

At least keep it consistent..
Click to expand...
No, not because I want it to. Read Carefully below:

Did the Lakers offer Randle or Nance to the Celtics this week? Rhetorical question.

Now if you can't infer that the Lakers value Nance more than Randle because the Lakers were ready to part with Randle to move up to #1, then it's time to call it a night.

Lakers are open to trading EVERYONE BUT INGRAM. Did you already forget that Magic said only BI was untouchable? But if you read between the lines and listen to the positive things Magic has said about Clarkson's potential on defense and compare it to what Magic has said about Russell, then you'll realize why Magic sees Clarkson as a better fit than Russell in what the Lakers are trying to do overall as a team.

Best believe, I've been keeping it consistent from Day 1:

1) Lakers are gonna trade Russell

2) Lakers are gonna trade Randle

3) Lakers will acquire a star sooner than later via trade or free agency

4) B.I., Nance, Zubac are the young assets they will keep

I have not wavered from these statements, not once. And this goes all the way back to the start of the season.

In fact, I will take it even further. I will bet you another G that the Lakers trade Randle before the 2018 season begins. You game?
 
Last edited:
wHipLAshTw03 said:
Now if you can't infer that the Lakers value Nance more than Randle because the Lakers were ready to part with Randle to move up to #1, then it's time to call it a night.
Click to expand...

And yet despite numerous reports that Clarkson could potentially be moved as soon as draft nite you say he's more valued than Russell [emoji]129300[/emoji][emoji]129300[/emoji][emoji]129300[/emoji]. By your logic they also value Nance more than the #2 pick since that was included in the rumored deal
 
Last edited:
leemelone said:
 
wHipLAshTw03 said:
Now if you can't infer that the Lakers value Nance more than Randle because the Lakers were ready to part with Randle to move up to #1, then it's time to call it a night.
 
Click to expand...
And yet despite numerous reports that Clarkson could potentially be moved as soon as draft nite you say he's more valued than Russell [emoji]129300[/emoji][emoji]129300[/emoji][emoji]129300[/emoji]. By your logic they also value Nance more than the #2 pick since that was included in the rumored deal
Click to expand...
Like I said, EVERYONE BUT INGRAM is trade bait. and like I said, Magic has made more positive comments about Clarkson than Russell. 

And did you already forget, Russell has been in more trade rumors than Clarkson in the last 6 months. FACTS.

Another FACT - the MOST RECENT trade rumor had to do with RANDLE not Clarkson.

I won't even address your last sentence because it was flat out stupid. You don't trade a #2 for a #1 straight up. The team with the #2 pick has to THROW IN another piece to balance out the trade. And guess who the throw in player was.......ya boy JULIUS RAMBO.

Go to bed bro...it's clear you don't want to place another $1K bet regarding Randle being traded by the beginning of the 2018 season because you sure as heck know Randle is as good as gone.
 
Last edited:
Nite nite son. I'll let you slide this time for not telling me happy father's day. But next time I'm expecting a gift :wink:
 
Last edited:
You better put in those OT hours kid because it may take you several months to save up that thousand dollar prize you bout to give away come October
 
that video of bron in his backyard was awesome. bet its fun as hell to have bron as your pops. and equally as fun to be bron and have kids. Dude looked huuuuuge with all of those 10 yr olds. Looked spry too, like he can play at least 2 more yrs.
 
Freeze said:
that video of bron in his backyard was awesome. bet its fun as hell to have bron as your pops. and equally as fun to be bron and have kids. Dude looked huuuuuge with all of those 10 yr olds. Looked spry too, like he can play at least 2 more yrs.
Click to expand...
Bron got a good 4 elite years left
 
clarkson and nance are the least valuable of the young assets. thats why you will hear magic talk positive about them. to sell their worth.

but nobody is buying it because like i said they are least valuable trade chips.

clarkson is so one dimensional its disgusting
 
NobleKane said:
clarkson and nance are the least valuable of the young assets. thats why you will hear magic talk positive about them. to sell their worth.

but nobody is buying it because like i said they are least valuable trade chips.

clarkson is so one dimensional its disgusting
Click to expand...
JC forreal got the Michael Vick cone vision
At least he's a good shooter doe
 
The WNBA isn't engulfed by rings culture and general narrative nonsense so it's easy to just look at who is just flat out better at playing basketball.

I've been actively watching the WNBA for a few years now, and was just having this conversation cause Taurasi took over the scoring list last night.

They're 1Aand 1B and no one else is close.
 
Last edited:
Antidope said:
The WNBA isn't engulfed by rings culture and general narrative nonsense so it's easy to just look at who is just flat out better at playing basketball.

I've been actively watching the WNBA for a few years now, and was just having this conversation cause Taurasi took over the scoring list last night.

They're 1Aand 1B and no one else is close.
Click to expand...


Would they be considered better than Cynthia Cooper or Lauren Jackson?
 
Hardens beard said:
Antidope said:
The WNBA isn't engulfed by rings culture and general narrative nonsense so it's easy to just look at who is just flat out better at playing basketball.

I've been actively watching the WNBA for a few years now, and was just having this conversation cause Taurasi took over the scoring list last night.

They're 1Aand 1B and no one else is close.
Click to expand...


Would they be considered better than Cynthia Cooper or Lauren Jackson?
Click to expand...
They're better than EVERYONE.
 
With all the banter KD's engaging in on Twitter, you can tell the narratives bother him. He's a big all-around NBA fan so that doesn't surprise me, wouldn't surprise me seeing him leave in 2-3 years because of it either
 
OlDirtyReseller said:
Talking about Moore when you say they're?

Wouldn't know, never watched a lick of WNBA
Click to expand...
YUP. She's a legend.

OlDirtyReseller said:
With all the banter KD's engaging in on Twitter, you can tell the narratives bother him. He's a big all-around NBA fan so that doesn't surprise me, wouldn't surprise me seeing him leave in 2-3 years because of it either
Click to expand...
He used to always tweet though, there was a time where Kevin Durant had the best athlete twitter period.
 
Maya Moore is the best women's basketball player I've ever seen. She's struggling this year though.

Taurasi is the 2nd best I've seen. She used to obliterate the women's 3pt line. She was shooting 9 3s per game in '06....and hitting 40% of them :x
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom