- 146,771
- 193,135
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
the point I'm making is having all of those guys (mainly ibaka, adams, kanter and mcgary.. and also collision).. when kanter is out you have adams out there.. both guys should be able to get 20+ minsYep. Just saying, I don't see OKC winning because of Kanter in the playoffs. I'm positive he will not be apart of their best lineups. Not saying they cannot win with Kanter on the rosterJust another quick not about Enes Kanter.
The pairing of Kanter and Ibaka gave up 110 points per 100.
Also, there really aren't any positive combinations that include Kanter.
I think none, actually.. It just defeats the purpose of them giving him all this money when they can do just fine and probably go all the way without him because of Adams and Ibaka. If Adams or Ibaka gets injured, then your defense will suck regardless of Kanter being on the floor or another big. I also don't think Kanter will be the big difference maker if Adams or Ibaka went down.
Basically, Kanter puts up these big numbers, but doesn't really contribute to winning. He may change and work his **** off defensively, though.
if kanter is getting abused on defense, you have adams.. adams gets in foul trouble, you have kanter.. could even play them together