Recent content by realeyez

They look good accept the fact that the ending date is 2010. This particular pair came out in December of 2009.

Yeah. The production date is fine on these shoes. Now I can see if the date was 3 months ahead or, 3 months behind. But no. It is the month of September (9) on these shoes in the pics as a whole lot of 2013 Royal 1's were made on the 9th month (Sept.).

Yeah your right. My point is the DAYS the shoes were made are irrelevant. From my experience, the ACTUAL DATE is what matters because the days are usually different and i have seen a whole lot of 2013 Royal 1's start with 9. 

That is not to say that it doesn't happen and that it don't exist. Unless we both have seen every 2013 Air Jordan 1 Royal out there worldwide and seen with our own eyes all the flaws that pass through "Quality Control" at Nike. We really can't say 100% we know for sure. Still just speculation...

And I suppose you have seen this for yourself? You have launched a full investigation into the Nike Font system and know that EVERY single shoe that Nike has released ALL have the very same font? Impossible and pure speculation.

Well, all i see are variations. That's it. Because I have seen worse come right out of "Reputable" shoe stores such as Finishline.

I'm not referring to your post. I was speaking with another about the Royals (which is what this thread is about) before you posted your shoes asking about "Authenticity".

I wish i could but i'm not the owner of these shoes. Just seen the post. And we can't say it is just "One Shoe". This would be speculation as we don't have access to all the 2013 Air Jordan Royals that were released all over the world.

So far you have given me nothing solid. Just a "Fat Swoosh". And a "Nike Air Logo". Simple variations on a shoe. I need something solid my man. I think the evidence rests on the 88 Retro 3 having 2 completely different types of Elephant Print. And two different completely different leather cuts...

This would fall in the category of "High cut leather" or "Glue on the shoe". Nothing more than a simple matter of variation due to poor quality control. I have held shoes in my hands through out the years that come right out of places like Finishline with glue everywhere, paint on the mid sole...

Thats it? Variations can happen. I have seen some great Replicas and these don't even touch that realm. In all my years of studying the Air Jordan shoe I have come to see that there are crazy amounts of variations on the shoes especially nowadays (you get what you get). And in all my experience...

Actually some don't. I have held many in my hand that are slipped out the back by known Nike reps. Also, the dates vary depending on production and from what warehouse. The dates on the 2013 Royals ALL start with a 9/. The day itself is irellevant as long as the date is correct. Anyhow, the...

Why you callin' "Fake bruh? Elaborate a lil for us?? Box is a little jacked. Overall though. They look good. correct tags on inside and on box (UPCs match up). Toe box looks good. Color is solid. And the height is straight. Most of the real FAKES are off in color. UPCs don't match up and the...

Yeah, the same for me. I got a sweet pair out of the multiples I bought. Your FACTS are straight as well. There are MANY VARIATIONS of the 88 3 Retro's due to different production dates in different factories. The TRUTH of the matter is that Nike/Jordan Brand gives you what they want. It's not...