Nah it's Zoom Fly. The medial has it printed there. Nike stuffed it in early press releases and since then people have run with incorrect info. It's definitely a Zoom Fly.
Whilst I'm optimistic usually there's no way I'd recommend these as being TTS to anyone. Definitely a much smaller fit than the regular Zoom Fly runner which has a fair bit of toebox space. It gives some evidence to how the Vaporfly might fit though, luckily those should be easy enough to try on...
The GR version is more pleasant on-foot, the absence of padding and the plasticky upper material on the SPs makes them less comfortable. Soles are exactly the same so no difference there.
Having got the SP's finally I'm happy to say they fit quite small and now I can't wear them. Hoorah!
Interesting. I have a pair with the yellow midsole as well but they're an earlier sample. They're called "Zoom One" and the whole upper's weave is slightly different to the released version. The medial side is also volt (not contrasting), with the black accents being sequoia not black. The...
The SKU for the Milan release was 624194-004 which I think it should still be. I've emailed RRS, fingers crossed. I can't call them as I'm on the other side of the planet.
If anyone bothered to read Crooked's article they mentioned that Nike had wrongly sent pics of the original Inneva instead of the rainbow speckled sole version. It's very possible that everyone else got the same image package and as well were sent the wrong pics and just assumed they're...
This is false, none of the footwear is made in Italy. The clothing from Nike's White Label range is made in Italy and that is what has confused people who reported as such, which in turn lead people to believe it. If you own a pair of these you will know that they are indeed made in China.