Search results

The Lakers are not going to be able to pair Kobe with anyone, because nobody wants to play WITH him. Enjoy the next two years, it is going to be fantastic.

The same thing that is wrong with you. What.

Oh yeah, because that would be the reason for Kobe fans to say they would not want the Lakers to sign him. Love is better than anyone that the Lakers have under the basket, right now. Too bad the Lakers will never find out just how much better.

Uh, yes he was, and still is among a certain demographic.  As politically incorrect as it may be to say now, MJ was Cosby Show cool. Don't forget the influence he had while wearing black shoes, shaving his head, then wearing baggy shorts. MIchigan followed him, it wasn't the other way around...

No way in hell Love goes to LA either.

I'm not. I thought that shot was one of the greatest I have ever seen.  Goosebumps, I got goosebumps watching him take it.  To watch all of the good vibes that Swag brought to the team two games ago go down the drain, was breathtaking. Nobody, and I mean nobody, can do it like the Black...

Well, there is the GOAT doing the thing he does best!

Janice Dickinson isn't very credible. Yes, I also do believe that she would lie about being raped. Your last question really, and truly, takes things in another direction, of which has nothing to do with character of one Janice Dickinson. 

Thanks for proving me correct.

Your arguments are circular in nature. I've just agreed with you by stating that cameras are fine as well, however, you find a way to create yet another argument. I see that nothing productive will come out of discussing this matter with you.

Cameras conveniently break, especially if in pursuit of a perp. Sure, they can use cameras as well, along with blood tests, which do not lie.

I still do not see where you've stated that they should be tested for drugs and alcohol, after discharging their weapons anywhere in your posts, but I guess this admission is a start.

You are still deflecting, as you completely ignored the question on Ferguson. I have been very clear. Deal with what I asked you, and do not bring anyone else's comments into it. Should police officers be tested for drugs and alcohol, after discharging their weapons?

You are deflecting.

Again, you deflect, then not dealing with what I've asked you. The questions were not that hard to deal with, and they weren't loaded questions either. At no point did I state that the officers were high when any shootings occurred. However, the fact that there is no mandatory drug testing...

Janice Dickinson has said a whole lot of things, that have turned out to not to be true. Just google her.

It is used as a deterrent against these so called accidental shootings, with bad lighting.

He didn't suggest that in order to give you an out. Let's see if you are truly a thinker, and then not simply an antagonist. Can you drive a car while under the influence? How many people think that they can, safely? What stops them from doing so? Does the law stop them from driving while...

I would like you to reread my statement again, thoroughly. At no point did I state that they were intoxicated. The issue at hand is to deter gun violence. If the officer knew that he/she had taken one toke earlier in the day, they'd think twice about discharging a weapon later on, if they have...

You've just deflected. They are not tested after firing their weapons, as this should be mandatory.