Search results

Bump

I thought these looked good overall, but what threw me off was the cement print being a lot thinner on the front of the right shoe, as seen in the first photo. The production date is also not quite touching the barcode, although I don't know how much of a space there can be before it gets...

For the most part these looked good, but a few things threw me off. The Nike stitching on the back looked smaller than normal, and the reserved logos on the sole are definitely not as raised as the Nike logo. I had a hard time comparing to photos, so I figured I'd ask in here. Hopefully you can...

Bump

The cut of the patent leather is ok? It's way lower than another pair I have. The other pair is size 7 and these are size 8, so you'd think these would have a higher cut if anything

I got a second pair of bred 11s, and while for the most part the quality is the same, a few things threw me off. For one, the patent leather was cut much lower. Also, the patent leather felt much softer than on my first pair. My first pair had stiff patent leather. Not sure if that's because...

Just wanted to check these are good since the XI thread applies to newer retros

And the wings logo isn't supposed to be debossed at all? Usually in photos it seemed at least somewhat set into the leather but these have it just printed right on.

Do 94 bred 1s have a textured wings logo? I just got a pair and everything looks ok, but the wings logo is just printed on. I have a pair of 01 royals and the logo is very clearly debossed into the leather so you can feel all of the details

The only thing that threw me off was the tag, seeing as most pairs have a different one, but I've seen a few with this tag and just wanted to be safe.

Bump

What initially threw me off was the height of the elephant print was different on the back, but I saw it looked similar on my white cements which I got from Foot Locker.

Noticed the 23 was placed differently on each shoe which threw me off.

Thanks in advance.