#1 shoe, and always will be. black highs and white lows for me all day. people overuse the word classic too much, but if there is only one classic in the entire sneaker universe, these are it. even non-sneakerheads can tell you that.
----
WTB: AF1 mid '03 white/sport royal, Lunar dunks west sz 11
what scares me is that if the JD ones never come here i'll find myself buying the ones with the red toebox out of sheer desperation for having 1 AML in my collection. oh nike, how you @#%$ me over..
----
WTB: AF1 mid '03 white/sport royal, Lunar dunks west sz 11
feeling Batmans, wish it was an AF1 instead, but I can't rock patent leather, the colors of my shirts are too dull.
----
WTB: AF1 mid '03 white/sport royal, Lunar dunks west sz 11
Eating at a pizza chain like Sbarro is a waste of time if you're in NY, cause there's so many mom and pop's that make better pizza.
best pizza in the city, imo, Gabi's in Hollis Queens. obviously, i got some hometown bias, and don't expect you to schlep all the way out there, but just throwing...
this place legit? called J.J.'s or something, in the Busy Mall on Main St. the fact that it's in a flea market basement makes me a bit nervous, though nothing I saw there looked obviously fake.
They look like they were made to compete with Vans, but I don't think anyone who buys mostly Vans would ever consider picking up this shoe. I rock both Nike and Vans, and I think this shoe looks horrible, nevermind trying to appeal to people who don't rock Nike whatsoever.
i like the supreme torontos, but i refuse to spend 200 bucks on an uptown. jordans, maybe. af1, definitely not worth the price. maybe if i was drunk, and maybe if the tongue wasn't yellow, but otherwise no.
it really works with the clyde, i'd say. any other shoe except maybe the vans old skool would look wack with the same pattern. i was scared when i saw the title of this post because the luda kicks were downright atrocious
gonna decide whether to cop when it gets closer to release, but so far...