A.I.G. Used Bailout Money To Pay $165 mil in Bonuses to Same Execs That Caused The Bailout Process..

Ja's 2¢

formerly vcshoxj6
6,720
2,615
Joined
Jun 20, 2001
smh.gif
Getting a bonus because you almost brought down the company the year before: Priceless.

[h1]A.I.G. Planning Huge Bonuses After $170 Billion Bailouthttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/business/15AIG.html?_r=1#[/h1]

WASHINGTON - The American International Group, which has received more than $170 billion in taxpayer bailout money from the Treasury and Federal Reserve, plans to pay about $165 million in bonuses by Sunday to executives in the same business unit that brought the company to the brink of collapse last year.

Skip to next paragraph
15aig.190.jpg

YM Yik/European Pressphoto Agency

Edward M. Liddy, the government-appointed chairman of A.I.G., argued that some bonuses were needed to keep the most skilled executives.

[h4]Related[/h4] [h2]Times Topics: American International Group Inc.[/h2]
http://
[h3]Readers' Comments[/h3]
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.

Word of the bonuses last week stirred such deep consternation inside the Obama administration that Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner told the firm they were unacceptable and demanded they be renegotiated, a senior administration official said. But the bonuses will go forward because lawyers said the firm was contractually obligated to pay them.

The payments to A.I.G.'s financial products unit are in addition to $121 million in previously scheduled bonuses for the company's senior executives and 6,400 employees across the sprawling corporation. Mr. Geithner last week pressured A.I.G. to cut the $9.6 million going to the top 50 executives in half and tie the rest to performance.

The payment of so much money at a company at the heart of the financial collapse that sent the broader economy into a tailspin almost certainly will fuel a popular backlash against the government's efforts to prop up Wall Street. Past bonuses already have prompted President Obama and Congress to impose tough rules on corporate executive compensation at firms bailed out with taxpayer money.

A.I.G., nearly 80 percent of which is now owned by the government, defended its bonuses, arguing that they were promised last year before the crisis and cannot be legally canceled. In a letter to Mr. Geithner, Edward M. Liddy, the government-appointed chairman of A.I.G., said at least some bonuses were needed to keep the most skilled executives.

"We cannot attract and retain the best and the brightest talent to lead and staff the A.I.G. businesses - which are now being operated principally on behalf of American taxpayers - if employees believe their compensation is subject to continued and arbitrary adjustment by the U.S. Treasury," he wrote Mr. Geithner on Saturday.

Still, Mr. Liddy seemed stung by his talk with Mr. Geithner, calling their conversation last Wednesday "a difficult one for me" and noting that he receives no bonus himself. "Needless to say, in the current circumstances," Mr. Liddy wrote, "I do not like these arrangements and find it distasteful and difficult to recommend to you that we must proceed with them."

An A.I.G. spokeswoman said Saturday that the company had no comment beyond the letter. The bonuses were first reported by The Washington Post.

The senior government official, who was not authorized to speak on the record, said the administration was outraged. "It is unacceptable for Wall Street firms receiving government assistance to hand out million-dollar bonuses, while hard-working Americans bear the burden of this economic crisis," the official said.

Of all the financial institutions that have been propped up by taxpayer dollars, none has received more money than A.I.G. and none has infuriated lawmakers more with practices that policy makers have called reckless.

The bonuses will be paid to executives at A.I.G.'s financial products division, the unit that wrote trillions of dollars' worth of credit-default swaps that protected investors from defaults on bonds backed in many cases by subprime mortgages.

The bonus plan covers 400 employees, and the bonuses range from as little as $1,000 to as much as $6.5 million. Seven executives at the financial products unit were entitled to receive more than $3 million in bonuses.

Mr. Liddy, whom Federal Reserve and Treasury officials recruited after A.I.G. faltered last September and received its first round of bailout money, said the bonuses and "retention pay" had been agreed to in early 2008 and were for the most part legally required.

The company told the Treasury that there were two categories of bonus payments, with the first to be given to senior executives. The administration official said Mr. Geithner had told A.I.G. to revise them to protect taxpayer dollars and tie future payments to performance.

The second group of bonuses covers some 2008 retention payments from contracts entered into before government involvement in A.I.G. Indeed, in his letter to Mr. Geithner, Mr. Liddy wrote that he had shown the details of the $450 million bonus pool to outside lawyers and been told that A.I.G. had no choice but to follow through with the payment schedule.

The administration official said the Treasury Department did its own legal analysis and concluded that those contracts could not be broken. The official noted that even a provision recently pushed through Congress by Senator Christopher J. Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, had an exemption for such bonus agreements already in place.

But the official said the administration will force A.I.G. to eventually repay the cost of the bonuses to the taxpayers as part of the agreement with the firm, which is being restructured.

A.I.G. did cut other bonuses, Mr. Liddy explained, but those were part of the compensation for people who dealt in other parts of the company and had no direct involvement with the derivatives.

Mr. Liddy wrote that A.I.G. hoped to reduce its retention bonuses for 2009 by 30 percent. He said the top 25 executives at the financial products division had also agreed to reduce their salary for the rest of 2009 to $1.

Ever since it was bailed out by the government last fall, A.I.G. has been defending itself against accusations that it was richly compensating people who caused one of the biggest financial crises in American history.

A.I.G.'s main business is insurance, but the financial products unit sold hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of derivatives, the notorious credit-default swaps that nearly toppled the entire company last fall.

A.I.G. had set up a special bonus pool for the financial products unit early in 2008, before the company's near collapse, when problems stemming from the mortgage crisis were becoming clear and there were concerns that some of the best-informed derivatives specialists might leave. It locked in a total amount, $450 million, for the financial products unit and prepared to pay it in a series of installments, to encourage people to stay.

Only part of the payments had been made by last fall, when A.I.G. nearly collapsed. In documents provided to the Treasury, A.I.G. said it was required to pay about $165 million in bonuses on or before Sunday. That is in addition to $55 million in December.

Under a deal reached last week, A.I.G. agreed that the top 50 executives would get half of the $9.6 million they were supposed to get by March 15. The second half of their bonuses would be paid out in two installments in July and in September. To get those payments, Treasury officials said, A.I.G. would have to show that it had made progress toward its goal of selling off business units and repaying the government.

The financial products unit is now being painstakingly wound down.
Mary Williams Walsh contributed reporting.
 
These people are unbelievable. I hope the government puts a stop to this if its the bailout money that was given to them.
 
The AIG bailout is one of the most corrupt doings in United States history. End of story.
 
I hope the stimulus doesn't follow the same path. Is there anything that can stop it? I do not know
 
laugh.gif
they were gonna get their bonus money no matter what. it's all contractual. the government knew this was going to happen when they made the deal. youcan disagree with it, but theyre legally entitled to that money.
 
Originally Posted by Frankie Valentino

Fede, Rexanglorum come in and defend this.


I really cannot defend this because I was against AIG getting the bailout money from the start. Those who supported the bailouts should efend what ishappening.

If you want me to simply play devil's advocate here I would defend them on two grounds. Legally, they do not have to curtail the compensation becausecontracts still holds weight in our society. It may be possible that some of the executives at AIG are very competent and retaining them at the cost ofmillions could make or save AIG billions (and ostensibly get the money back to tax payers as soon as possible).

Ultimately, the people who supported the bailout, the people who were so easily tricked by Hank Paulson and his feigned anxiety, the people who thought thatKeith Olbermann is a good source of economic information, those "realists" who supported the bill are at fault.
 
Originally Posted by Nako XL

laugh.gif
they were gonna get their bonus money no matter what. it's all contractual. the government knew this was going to happen when they made the deal. you can disagree with it, but theyre legally entitled to that money.
there are contracts for bonuses?? YOU DO GOOD, you get thrown a bonus. you do bad... nothing. if its a annual thing, why isnt it just a part ofyour salary. I dont understand here.

unless the company was doing good a year ago, had bonuses lined up, and then the collapse magically happened and they still wanted their money. obviously theydidnt deserve any bonsues.. i think they're working with some loopholes
 
I just wish that when it comes to other government transfers of wealth from tax payers to those who are not needy, the media would be as vigilant and thepublic as indignant. I hope that Tim Gethner will also have "difficult discussions" with the CEO's of firms that will be fattening their bonuseswith stimulus money, will he do so with CEO's of major agricultural concerns, CEO's of companies that were already at the trough of subsidies.

To a lesser degree, Social security transfers wealth from the poor to the wealthier (plus it is Ponzi Scheme that dwarf's Bernie Madoff crocked fund),State Universities that charge very little for tuition are usually transferring wealth from the working class to the middle and upper middle class. Where isthe outrage over this. In big cities, the revenue is drawn fairly evenly from the population in sales tax and it ends up being spent on things that matter muchso to the wealthier citizens.

The amount of tax dollars that in transferred from all tax payers to those, who need the money the least, is staggering. I hope that this crackdown might havea chain reaction and call into question other poor to rich transfers of tax dollars.
 
-Edward M. Liddy, the government-appointed chairman of A.I.G., argued that some bonuses were needed to keep the most skilled executives.-

laugh.gif
laugh.gif
laugh.gif
this dude's a joke if i ever seen one. who's quitting their job to go to a more lucrative job right now?
 
Blame Barack and the Democrats for signing checks to AIG blindly. The mismanagement of the financial crisis has been sickening.
 
Back
Top Bottom