- 5,171
- 15,874
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2016
No, I have the OG TB 1.0. I’ve just been steadily collecting the various 1.0s that continue to release (with this one being the most recent, I now have all of the Korea exclusive 1.0s)
ADIDAS BOOST Thread - PAGE 1 for INFO- *NO BUYING/SELLING/TRADING*
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by jpac,
- Start date
- 4,036
- 6,238
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
in from
whats the name of these?
- 5,171
- 15,874
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2016
Adidas x Musinsa UB
FW9884
- 5,171
- 15,874
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2016
Adidas Ultraboost 1.0 OG 2020 'triple white'
Style: S77416 Color: White / White / White this is the 2020 version retro of the popular all white 1.0 ultra boost triple white ALL REQUEST TO CANCEL THERE WILL BE 5% CANCEL FEE
www.onenessboutique.com
- 28,179
- 12,530
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
Damn cooked for all the average size folksAdidas Ultraboost 1.0 OG 2020 'triple white'
Style: S77416 Color: White / White / White this is the 2020 version retro of the popular all white 1.0 ultra boost triple white ALL REQUEST TO CANCEL THERE WILL BE 5% CANCEL FEE
- 1,796
- 16
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2003
missed out on above
- 1,979
- 1,283
- Joined
- May 10, 2015
- 1,100
- 1,518
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2017
My triple white 1.0s from the adidas app were delivered today. One shoe has a stain/smudge that won’t come out yet. I didn’t want to try too hard for now so we shall see.
- 578
- 511
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2017
in from
like how it's low key non-3m compared to SMTMs.. lowest i've seen is $248 shipped to cali.. where you got them?
superblytrife
Supporter
- 20,636
- 21,551
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2002
Same for me only mine didn’t come from adidas, so there’s no returns. Talk about a buzzkill.
- 187
- 105
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2003
Foot Locker had these at 25% off $100 a few weeks back. Glad I scooped up a pair.
- 460
- 290
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2016
I just need me some core black 1.0s to daily, my 3.0s are well past their prime 
- 1,483
- 889
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2016
I hate to say it but if you’re worried bout smudges you bought the wrong shoe... those 1.0 Whites are total dirt magnets.
- 460
- 290
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2016
Tbh, this depends on the person. I am very anal about cleanliness with my shoes and have kept my Triple Whites pretty much spotless for over 2 years. So yes, a smudge on that shoe out of the box would ruin it for me
- 1,100
- 1,518
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2017
I actually prefer my shoes to have a naturally worn look and don’t like a shoe that looks new, white shoes included. However, this is looking more like a stain.
- 5,171
- 15,874
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2016
L - 2020 (right foot) , R - 2015 (left foot)
- 1,796
- 16
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2003
Any place has the UB triple white sz 12 anywhere for close to retail?
- 1,100
- 1,518
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2017
Both shoes have this indent/dimple on the outside. The left shoe with the smudge/stain on the inside after a quick/gentle cleaning. I haven’t tried again yet to see if it will come out; it was originally dark black.
Attachments
- 6,955
- 3,659
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2015
L - 2020 (right foot) , R - 2015 (left foot)
Toebox seems a lot slimmer on the 2020s
- 28,179
- 12,530
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
Thanks for the comparison! Is there a difference in fit and sizing?L - 2020 (right foot) , R - 2015 (left foot)
JPS
formerly instagram
- 30,408
- 35,078
- Joined
- May 4, 2015
More importantly. Ankle opening still tight af on these retros?
- 5,171
- 15,874
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2016
Visibly, the internal toe cap used on the new ones is less rounded. Otherwise, no discernible difference (after briefly slipping them on) in fit.
Yeah, since it goes back to using the neoprene/mesh at the back. (Which I found to be tighter than the full pk of later models)
- 28,179
- 12,530
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
Is ankle tighter than the OG or about the same?
- 1,979
- 1,283
- Joined
- May 10, 2015
- 1,979
- 1,283
- Joined
- May 10, 2015
Raffle up for these on sns
