- 20,018
- 10,849
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
Those are originals.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
just looks like it needs to be glued
u can call nike for a refundBoth carbon fibre plates have cracked. Probably balled 50 hours in these so I’ve jacked them up pretty good.
Any squeaking?Both carbon fibre plates have cracked. Probably balled 50 hours in these so I’ve jacked them up pretty good.
Nope. SJs are great but the Concords more true to OG construction and slightly better shape and patent cut makes them the top dog.Crazy how the concords look better than the UNCs and its only a tiny color difference....that shoe needs the proper colorway.
spacejams still the best though
Both are great releases. But the Concord takes a slight edge over the 2016 release due to what you have said along with the ankle cut. But I understand the love for the Blacks.Nope. SJs are great but the Concords’ more true to OG construction and slightly better shape and patent cut makes them the top dog.
Hey I love my ‘16s but without the padding in the upper they remain a literal shell of what they should be.Both are great releases. But the Concord takes a slight edge over the 2016 release due to what you have said along with the ankle cut. But I understand the love for the Blacks.
For sure, they got the padding right on these no doubt.Hey I love my ‘16s but without the padding in the upper they remain a literal shell of what they should be.
Zero at all.Any squeaking?
The ankle cut and placement of the jumpman are different. Along with the toe box pl and slant. Either way, both releases are dope. I cant argue anyone that likes one over the other more.There’s no real difference in shape from what I see the space jam has a thicker better quality sock liner
Huh? Insoles better in concords. Toe shape more like the OG. And what JRepp23 said. Not bashing SJs, just noting real differences. And I despise the uppers without the proper padding.There’s no real difference in shape from what I see the space jam has a thicker better quality sock liner
Huh? Insoles better in concords. Toe shape more like the OG. And what JRepp23 said. Not bashing SJs, just noting real differences. And I despise the uppers without the proper padding.
I don’t think so, dude. Concords have the OG-style polyurethane insole. It’s personal preference but I like that more than the other. I like how concords are stiffer out of the box. But either way both shoes are sick. Jams could’ve just been a bit better, that’s all I’m sayin.I haven’t even checked like that tbh so I don’t doubt what you guys are saying is true. But we can all agree the space jam sock liner is thicker/better quality right?
I don’t think so, dude. Concords have the OG-style polyurethane insole. It’s personal preference but I like that more than the other. I like how concords are stiffer out of the box. But either way both shoes are sick. Jams could’ve just been a bit better, that’s all I’m sayin.
Oh. That’s not the sockliner. But OK. That piece may or may not be different between the two. Just not something I notice wearing them.I’m aware of the og insole I’m talking about the neoprene or whatever that is sockliner that the 45 is stitched on. Not the insole.