Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Jordan Brand' started by salacious crumb, Sep 26, 2017.
That shoe ain’t even explode. Sole just came off due to age/wear or lack there of
Compared to my UNCs...
Didn’t want to gravedig a CG XI thread, but Deeeyum.
Crazy how the concords look better than the UNCs and its only a tiny color difference....that shoe needs the proper colorway.
spacejams still the best though
Both carbon fibre plates have cracked. Probably balled 50 hours in these so I’ve jacked them up pretty good.
just looks like it needs to be glued
far from what happened to zion
u can call nike for a refund
lol the thirst for attention is strong for whoever that is
Dude said "exploding", damn sole just came unglued.
I'm sure he got a dislocated shoulder with that reach.
Nope. SJs are great but the Concords more true to OG construction and slightly better shape and patent cut makes them the top dog.
Both are great releases. But the Concord takes a slight edge over the 2016 release due to what you have said along with the ankle cut. But I understand the love for the Blacks.
Hey I love my ‘16s but without the padding in the upper they remain a literal shell of what they should be.
welp somone post comparison pics of the spacejams and concords
The Concord has the correct shape, height, and cut of the pl. The slight blue tint in the outsole is also correct. Super thin cut of pl.
While the Blacks have a more blue tint, lower cut pl in the (back) only to be over compensated at the toe box, incorrect shape, but a true to form stitched 45. And a slight thicker cut of pl as well.
For sure, they got the padding right on these no doubt.
Zero at all.
There’s no real difference in shape from what I see the space jam has a thicker better quality sock liner
The ankle cut and placement of the jumpman are different. Along with the toe box pl and slant. Either way, both releases are dope. I cant argue anyone that likes one over the other more.
Huh? Insoles better in concords. Toe shape more like the OG. And what @JRepp23 said. Not bashing SJs, just noting real differences. And I despise the uppers without the proper padding.
I haven’t even checked like that tbh so I don’t doubt what you guys are saying is true. But we can all agree the space jam sock liner is thicker/better quality right?
I don’t think so, dude. Concords have the OG-style polyurethane insole. It’s personal preference but I like that more than the other. I like how concords are stiffer out of the box. But either way both shoes are sick. Jams could’ve just been a bit better, that’s all I’m sayin.
I’m aware of the og insole I’m talking about the neoprene or whatever that is sockliner that the 45 is stitched on. Not the insole.
Oh. That’s not the sockliner. But OK. That piece may or may not be different between the two. Just not something I notice wearing them.
I’ll have to look at my sj’s and Cords later to compare.
I wore my Cords yesterday for only about the 5th time or so, really do love how comfortable these are. Tempted to pull the trigger on a 3rd pair.