- 2,998
- 5,624
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2014
So you sat there and typed all of this?
[emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
So you sat there and typed all of this?
alright here is my honest opinion on the '09 vs '16.received my NDC pair yesterday & spent about a hr. comparing these side by side.My '16 NDC pair came with box damaged like somebody punted it on to the shipping truck.i know it's just a box & we don't wear em but i must say i'm very impressed with the over all packaging presentation.i've seen the box countless times on YT videos but in hand these don't compare so that is disappointing as the space is my favorite XI & the sneaker that got me into collecting the '09 pair in particular (tho i've worn j's since elementary in the '90s).My '16 pair came with nit picky flaws but the one that does kind of bother me is this crease on the toe box on one of the shoes.i believe it's the right one can't really call it a crease like the ones your get from the wearing /bending of the shoe but like they didn't cut & sew the toe box patent properly more of like a air bubble like a line bubble not the usual circular air bubble best way i can explain it.it's right in the center of the toe box it's not that noticeable unless your looking at them in hand like i said it's a nit picky flaw but now i notice it.it does bother me but nothing i can't look past especially since i paid slightly under retail there were also other nit picky flaws not even worth mentioning.now on to the actual comparison of the shoes as far as the sizing i took one left & one right shoe of each pair & placed the back heels directly against the wall side by side & the length of the '16 pair was barely bigger but what i did notice is the width of the toe box of the '16 pair was noticeably bigger & this is where preference comes in.'09 is slim & sleek vs the '16 pair being bulky looking & of course the obvious the patent cut.now on to the quality the '16 has better quality materials but in my opinion not much better not a "night & day" quality difference like people are claiming on here.not much better than the '09 quality that people are claiming that is trash my 09's have been worn casually over 60 times with sneaker shields & cleaned with wipes after each wear & besides light yellowing & light cracking of the screen printed 23 on back are the only very minor flaws.i occasionally get complemented "i like your new kicks" by non sneaker people/sneaker collectors/heads alike.people also like to ask how much i paid i say "$175 + tax on release date".not always but it's not uncommon they look at me side ways like i'm lying to be cool or i'm rocking fakes.my whole point of my semi rant is how can such a garbage shoe hold up so well 7 yrs. later but just like anything if you take care of em they will hold up well if of decent quality.now back to which one i prefer i prefer the '09s i didn't own a 11 till then so i'm use to the XI mid low patent cut they look more sleek & not bulky like the OG style.i'm biased when it comes to the aesthetic just like the og heads at the end of the day it comes down to preference.those who say the '09 is garbage are just being blasphemous but everyone is going to have their opinion.
Jesus
No one is trying to read all that
Anybody's Shoe Palace order say 1 LB on shipping weight? 'My champs and NDC pair say 5 LB's
All sz 12
Does everyone get 3 day select shipping from snkrs orders? Getting my shipment today, located in cali if it matters.
That post looks like an haiku in comparison to charmcitykid's post a few pages.Jesus
No one is trying to read all that
So my SNKRS order that they told me was delayed until the 20th just shipped and is out for delivery today? Apparently they have been shipped since Saturday but just now updated.
Does all Nike shipments come with the Memphis box ?
Medium white Tune squad jersey I'm looking for retail PLEASE
Probably a cool story but nobody could read that even if they were inclined to try.alright here is my honest opinion on the '09 vs '16.received my NDC pair yesterday & spent about a hr. comparing these side by side.My '16 NDC pair came with box damaged like somebody punted it on to the shipping truck.i know it's just a box & we don't wear em but i must say i'm very impressed with the over all packaging presentation.i've seen the box countless times on YT videos but in hand these don't compare so that is disappointing as the space is my favorite XI & the sneaker that got me into collecting the '09 pair in particular (tho i've worn j's since elementary in the '90s).My '16 pair came with nit picky flaws but the one that does kind of bother me is this crease on the toe box on one of the shoes.i believe it's the right one can't really call it a crease like the ones your get from the wearing /bending of the shoe but like they didn't cut & sew the toe box patent properly more of like a air bubble like a line bubble not the usual circular air bubble best way i can explain it.it's right in the center of the toe box it's not that noticeable unless your looking at them in hand like i said it's a nit picky flaw but now i notice it.it does bother me but nothing i can't look past especially since i paid slightly under retail there were also other nit picky flaws not even worth mentioning.now on to the actual comparison of the shoes as far as the sizing i took one left & one right shoe of each pair & placed the back heels directly against the wall side by side & the length of the '16 pair was barely bigger but what i did notice is the width of the toe box of the '16 pair was noticeably bigger & this is where preference comes in.'09 is slim & sleek vs the '16 pair being bulky looking & of course the obvious the patent cut.now on to the quality the '16 has better quality materials but in my opinion not much better not a "night & day" quality difference like people are claiming on here.not much better than the '09 quality that people are claiming that is trash my 09's have been worn casually over 60 times with sneaker shields & cleaned with wipes after each wear & besides light yellowing & light cracking of the screen printed 23 on back are the only very minor flaws.i occasionally get complemented "i like your new kicks" by non sneaker people/sneaker collectors/heads alike.people also like to ask how much i paid i say "$175 + tax on release date".not always but it's not uncommon they look at me side ways like i'm lying to be cool or i'm rocking fakes.my whole point of my semi rant is how can such a garbage shoe hold up so well 7 yrs. later but just like anything if you take care of em they will hold up well if of decent quality.now back to which one i prefer i prefer the '09s i didn't own a 11 till then so i'm use to the XI mid low patent cut they look more sleek & not bulky like the OG style.i'm biased when it comes to the aesthetic just like the og heads at the end of the day it comes down to preference.those who say the '09 is garbage are just being blasphemous but everyone is going to have their opinion.
I guess no stories of stores making you wear your kicks out the store
OK I never had success on the holiday release. I did get the Pantone pack but not the Columbia. Thanks.Holiday releases tends to only include that congrats paper.
My 72-10s came with return label and an extra pair from NDC came with a thank you paperOK I never had success on the holiday release. I did get the Pantone pack but not the Columbia. Thanks.
exactly an employee should do his job, winning or losing doesn't stop his direct depositSo you're saying there's no incentive to winning a championship in a sport? An athlete shouldn't give it his or her best because they're going to be paid regardless?