- 5,560
- 3,841
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2007
COOOPPPPPPPEEDDDDD
Air Jordan xxxiv first info
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by 225159,
- Start date
- 17,863
- 21,160
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2016
So dope. Really like those
rainking
Supporter
- 8,020
- 17,301
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
OH **** me. Damn you, Nike/JB.
- 2,641
- 2,607
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2015
Finally
- 11,773
- 14,351
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
Yeah those are tough
- 4,963
- 5,491
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2010
Came here for those
- 3,248
- 6,231
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2020
Nice but give me a black bottom/sole and I'm sold.
- 4,786
- 7,895
- Joined
- May 12, 2003
HOOPERS!
- 11,592
- 20,798
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2013
So these are the May 7, 2020 ones? Yes please.
- 12,772
- 11,647
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2007
Those are dope as ****.
- 10,453
- 18,474
- Joined
- May 7, 2002
Mandatory...
- 13,044
- 10,609
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2016
DJ Khaled shows a pair of 34 low's in his new IG care package post:
PO
another one. too bad Nike/JB can't even give these to actual hoopers.
rainking
Supporter
- 8,020
- 17,301
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
Only thing I don’t love from what we can see in that pic of the lows is that the eye-stay strip of material appears to be smooth leather rather than nubuck or faux suede or whatever. I think that would look better. But still a must-buy based on that image alone.
They really killed it this year and this model overall. I wonder if the 34 will go down as a lucky one-off in terms of its big success and cool styling ... or if these jokers finally learned a lesson and will give us something modern but classically Jordan again with the 35. This year proves that any Air Jordan flops of the past however many years had nothing to do with MJ being retired or no one caring anymore—and everything to do with wacky, at times hideously laughable shoes, regardless of whose name was on them.
Case in point: me. I was and am a huge MJ and AJ fan for 30-plus years now. But I only bought TWO annual Jordans between the 16s and this year. Because they were mostly just ... ugh. I only have the Chicago 34s but that’s just because I have too damn many shoes in my closet. I’ve had to stop myself several times from buying another pair of Chicagos and the Ambers as well. And I’ll probably end up regretting it. I’m definitely in for at least this pair of lows, maybe more. It’s been almost 20 years since I felt like that about a Jordan. Simply give us a genuinely dope shoe and clearly we’ll buy it. **** really isn’t rocket science.
They really killed it this year and this model overall. I wonder if the 34 will go down as a lucky one-off in terms of its big success and cool styling ... or if these jokers finally learned a lesson and will give us something modern but classically Jordan again with the 35. This year proves that any Air Jordan flops of the past however many years had nothing to do with MJ being retired or no one caring anymore—and everything to do with wacky, at times hideously laughable shoes, regardless of whose name was on them.
Case in point: me. I was and am a huge MJ and AJ fan for 30-plus years now. But I only bought TWO annual Jordans between the 16s and this year. Because they were mostly just ... ugh. I only have the Chicago 34s but that’s just because I have too damn many shoes in my closet. I’ve had to stop myself several times from buying another pair of Chicagos and the Ambers as well. And I’ll probably end up regretting it. I’m definitely in for at least this pair of lows, maybe more. It’s been almost 20 years since I felt like that about a Jordan. Simply give us a genuinely dope shoe and clearly we’ll buy it. **** really isn’t rocket science.
- 19
- 23
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2020
I feel exactly the same way the 34s are in my opinion the best J’s since the 14s. I had four of the colorways for the 34s I just recently sold my blue voids because of the shoe size. So, you can definitely tell, I’m feeling these silhouettes. I keep telling my friends that these are incredibly comfortable and great looking especially rocking them casually with jeans off court. I think that’s the viewpoint that my circle of friends view the newer signature J’s as, strictly on the court shoes. Where the retros were known for being extremely casual kicks.
rainking
Supporter
- 8,020
- 17,301
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
Absolutely. I mentioned the 16s but yeah, honestly, best J since maybe even the 13s. It’s certainly the shoe I can most see 1997-1998 (or if he had played in ‘99 or ‘00) MJ actually wearing. Not even a question.
- 10,453
- 18,474
- Joined
- May 7, 2002
For me the 23’s were the last time JB put out a sig I could actually picture Mike wearing...These definitely have that vibe...
- 43,534
- 27,832
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2002
I see couple sizes (10-12) of the Blue Void on Jumpman23 IG shop. Not sure what happens when you submit payment. I stopped at delivery info page of checkout
- 4,786
- 7,895
- Joined
- May 12, 2003
I see couple sizes (10-12) of the Blue Void on Jumpman23 IG shop. Not sure what happens when you submit payment. I stopped at delivery info page of checkout
Just bought a pair. Let y’all know what happens.
Last edited:
- 43,534
- 27,832
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2002
- 4,786
- 7,895
- Joined
- May 12, 2003
- 10,453
- 18,474
- Joined
- May 7, 2002
DSG has a couple sizes of Chi’s up for $134.99
- 3,644
- 4,898
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2012
On sale now on SNSDoes anyone have info on the long sleeve shirt the GIF model is wearing on the NDC XXXIV page?
code. SNS21
