** BART Officer ARRESTED in CONNECTION with NEW YEARS Shooting! **

[hugo]

wow this guy might go suicidal...

 

[socaking]

Who cares about thet charge, dont even get your hopes up. The fact that he was arrested is enough for me. It shows that he was wrong in one way or another.

 

[madfreshyo]

Originally Posted by Kobe Fan

hopefully he gets off free.

Must of not watched the video.
Just curious...WHY?

 

[kobe09877]

I can see both sides, unfortunate incident, prayers for all involved.

 

[finnns2003]

Originally Posted by Kobe09877

I can see both sides, unfortunate incident, prayers for all involved.

so you see a side where an innocent man was shot in his back, defenseless and unarmed? please.

 

[daytona 5000]

The hell is son doing in Nevada?

Let one of us try to skip town after murking a cop.

 

[poogibucker]

that officer grew up in my hometown

 

[long beach vincey]

Originally Posted by finnns2003

Originally Posted by Kobe09877

I can see both sides, unfortunate incident, prayers for all involved.

so you see a side where an innocent man was shot in his back, defenseless and unarmed? please.

Well IMO it was an accident. There aren't really two sides though. When you murder someone, there's really only one side.

 

[daytona 5000]

Originally Posted by Long Beach Vincey

Originally Posted by finnns2003

Originally Posted by Kobe09877

I can see both sides, unfortunate incident, prayers for all involved.

so you see a side where an innocent man was shot in his back, defenseless and unarmed? please.

Well IMO it was an accident. There aren't really two sides though. When you murder someone, there's really only one side.

An accident? So you felt the cop should've drawn his weapon?

 

[creekshow]

good news...I hope he gets what he deserves

 

[long beach vincey]

Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000

Originally Posted by Long Beach Vincey

Originally Posted by finnns2003

Originally Posted by Kobe09877

I can see both sides, unfortunate incident, prayers for all involved.

so you see a side where an innocent man was shot in his back, defenseless and unarmed? please.

Well IMO it was an accident. There aren't really two sides though. When you murder someone, there's really only one side.

An accident? So you felt the cop should've drawn his weapon?

No. Just because I said I believe it was an accident doesn't mean I think a weapon should have been drawn at all. He was an IDIOT for eventaking anything out. No need for a taser.

 

[cwrite78]

Originally Posted by Long Beach Vincey

Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000

Originally Posted by Long Beach Vincey

Originally Posted by finnns2003

Originally Posted by Kobe09877

I can see both sides, unfortunate incident, prayers for all involved.

so you see a side where an innocent man was shot in his back, defenseless and unarmed? please.

Well IMO it was an accident. There aren't really two sides though. When you murder someone, there's really only one side.

An accident? So you felt the cop should've drawn his weapon?

No. Just because I said I believe it was an accident doesn't mean I think a weapon should have been drawn at all. He was an IDIOT for even taking anything out. No need for a taser.

so it wasn't an accident, but a stupid decision that cost somebody their life.

 

[long beach vincey]

Originally Posted by CWrite78

Originally Posted by Long Beach Vincey

Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000

Originally Posted by Long Beach Vincey

Originally Posted by finnns2003

Originally Posted by Kobe09877

I can see both sides, unfortunate incident, prayers for all involved.

so you see a side where an innocent man was shot in his back, defenseless and unarmed? please.

Well IMO it was an accident. There aren't really two sides though. When you murder someone, there's really only one side.

An accident? So you felt the cop should've drawn his weapon?

No. Just because I said I believe it was an accident doesn't mean I think a weapon should have been drawn at all. He was an IDIOT for even taking anything out. No need for a taser.

so it wasn't an accident, but a stupid decision that cost somebody their life.

Uh, it was an accident, a stupid one, but yeah you could go ahead and classify it as such. Stupid decision = accident no? Either way he didn'tMEAN to murder, at least IMO. There's no motivation there, no reason. Now if it had come out that he's a known racist or whatever, then of coursewe'd have reason to believe he did it on purpose.

The officer deserves the full penalty, but I'm just saying I doubt he wanted to kill dude.

 

[kobe09877]

Originally Posted by CWrite78

Originally Posted by Long Beach Vincey

Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000

Originally Posted by Long Beach Vincey

Originally Posted by finnns2003

Originally Posted by Kobe09877

I can see both sides, unfortunate incident, prayers for all involved.

so you see a side where an innocent man was shot in his back, defenseless and unarmed? please.

Well IMO it was an accident. There aren't really two sides though. When you murder someone, there's really only one side.

An accident? So you felt the cop should've drawn his weapon?

No. Just because I said I believe it was an accident doesn't mean I think a weapon should have been drawn at all. He was an IDIOT for even taking anything out. No need for a taser.

so it wasn't an accident, but a stupid decision that cost somebody their life.

it was an accident, look at the officers reaction, but what I mean by both sides is the anguish they both have to go through. Nobody can tell what the officerwas thinkin, he obviously wasnt thinking much.

 

[holdenmichael]

Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000

The hell is son doing in Nevada?

Let one of us try to skip town after murking a cop.

That was my first thought.

Did this guy have family to visit or take a vacation because he knew he'd be in prison for the foreseeable future?

I just hope the officer gets what he deserves, no less, no more.

 

[kobe fan]

1. If the Bart police were never needed, this would have never happened, cause then effect.

2. Accident.

 

[coolnificent]

Originally Posted by CreekShow

good news...I hope he gets what he deserves

 

[long beach vincey]

Originally Posted by Kobe Fan

1. If the Bart police were never needed, this would have never happened, cause then effect.

2. Accident.

OK but why in the Hell would you wish the officer to get off free?? That's disgusting

 

[so4i5]

If he does not get charged, and found guilty of murder, Oakland will burn to the ground. And I'm not talking about the hills.

 

[b smooth 202]

Police brutality...something cops been getting away with FOREVER.


Hopefully not this time.

 

[sohi 23]

Originally Posted by Kobe Fan

1. If the Bart police were never needed, this would have never happened, cause then effect.

Does that really justify the action to you?

 

[finnns2003]

Originally Posted by Kobe Fan

1. If the Bart police were never needed, this would have never happened, cause then effect.

2. Accident.

right, because the situation called for and justified this 'effect'. you're misusing that concept. and sympathizing with a murderer.

 

[daytona 5000]

Originally Posted by Long Beach Vincey

Originally Posted by CWrite78

Originally Posted by Long Beach Vincey

Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000

Originally Posted by Long Beach Vincey

Originally Posted by finnns2003

Originally Posted by Kobe09877

I can see both sides, unfortunate incident, prayers for all involved.

so you see a side where an innocent man was shot in his back, defenseless and unarmed? please.

Well IMO it was an accident. There aren't really two sides though. When you murder someone, there's really only one side.

An accident? So you felt the cop should've drawn his weapon?

No. Just because I said I believe it was an accident doesn't mean I think a weapon should have been drawn at all. He was an IDIOT for even taking anything out. No need for a taser.

so it wasn't an accident, but a stupid decision that cost somebody their life.

Uh, it was an accident, a stupid one, but yeah you could go ahead and classify it as such. Stupid decision = accident no? Either way he didn't MEAN to murder, at least IMO. There's no motivation there, no reason. Now if it had come out that he's a known racist or whatever, then of course we'd have reason to believe he did it on purpose.

The officer deserves the full penalty, but I'm just saying I doubt he wanted to kill dude.

I don't understand this part. The cops have nightsticks and blackjacks and mace and taser and stun guns for a reason. They don't have gunsto calm down they have them as a last resort. If some psycho is in a car trying to run over a cop he isn't going to try and spray mace at him. That wouldbe ridiculous. Almost as ridiculous as pulling out a gun (which should only be used as a last resort in absolutely extreme circumstances) and shooting anunarmed man in the back while he is lying a face down and being subdued by other officers.

 

[ag 47]

Surprising....but I'm more interested in the actual conviction...not just the charges.

 

[dmbrhs]

How is it "surprising" that he was arrested?