- 4,701
- 22
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2007
Go with Fossil. I bought one eariler this year. Prices are right around what you want to spend. The watches dont look too bad either.
- 2,293
- 13
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2007
Listen to RFX, both Seiko's he posted look NICE!
He hooked me up with a great watch when I was looking last year
He hooked me up with a great watch when I was looking last year
- 1,140
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2003
rolex.
go big or go home.
go big or go home.
- 5,416
- 12
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2005
Only $450
Who would spend $450 on that monstrosity?
- 9,611
- 14
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2008
Who would spend $450 on that monstrosity?Originally Posted by AC4Three
Only $450
"Realtalk", I just might.
kakashi
Banned
- 463
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2009
- 13,868
- 44
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
kakashi
Banned
- 463
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2009
seiko?
- 2,821
- 18
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2003
OP did have a $100 budget. For $100 you can't get much and seiko isn't bad for his budget. It's much better than those kenneth colewatches.Originally Posted by Kakashi
seiko?
kakashi
Banned
- 463
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2009
but fossil offers much more style than seiko no one under thirty should be caught wearing a seiko....fossilOriginally Posted by BgL2687
OP did have a $100 budget. For $100 you can't get much and seiko isn't bad for his budget. It's much better than those kenneth cole watches.Originally Posted by Kakashi
seiko?
that is all.
good night.
- 266
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2005
Wow, you have no idea what you're talking about. Seiko has some nice watches.Originally Posted by Kakashi
but fossil offers much more style than seiko no one under thirty should be caught wearing a seiko....fossilOriginally Posted by BgL2687
OP did have a $100 budget. For $100 you can't get much and seiko isn't bad for his budget. It's much better than those kenneth cole watches.Originally Posted by Kakashi
seiko?
that is all.
good night.
Seiko > Fossil and it's not even close. Fossil is a good starter watch but not something you would wear once you get some decent cash to spend on anicer watch.
- 7,116
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2008
Rolex is trash. Go with a Breitling.
- 3,312
- 12
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2000
I agree that Seiko is a terrible watch brand at any price point. There is ALWAYS a better option than Seiko.
- 5,416
- 12
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2005
I disagree. And Fossil watches look trashy. You might as well get an Invicta...
- 2,522
- 12
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2007
any movado's around that range?
why is seiko getting *#%*+#$ on?
why is seiko getting *#%*+#$ on?
kakashi
Banned
- 463
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2009
- 2,821
- 18
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2003
- 269
- 11
- Joined
- May 24, 2007
Nope you arent getting a Movado for 100 bucks, youd be hard pressed to find a stainless steel strap watch of theirs under $1000
- 2,631
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2007
I would go with Fossil or Guess.
Or you could go with the $20 joints at the mall and replace them every couple years until you start making real dough.
Hell, when I was your age I was rocking iced out Genevas.
Or you could go with the $20 joints at the mall and replace them every couple years until you start making real dough.
Hell, when I was your age I was rocking iced out Genevas.
- 309
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2001
probably more than you want to spend but prices will be good...
Gucci watches on Gilt Groupe tomorrow starting at noon eastern time...up to 70% off
you need to be a member to buy so if you're not a member you can use this link:
invitation
Gucci watches on Gilt Groupe tomorrow starting at noon eastern time...up to 70% off
you need to be a member to buy so if you're not a member you can use this link:
invitation
- 5,637
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2007
I know absolutely nothing about this brand (edit. Well now I know they belong to Victorinox nowdays) but I think It's a nice deal for the sale price.
Amazon product ASIN B000HDHOTA
Amazon product ASIN B000HDHOTA
- 1,153
- 123
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
"Realtalk", I just might.Originally Posted by Nktran001
Who would spend $450 on that monstrosity?Originally Posted by AC4Three
Only $450
I have that exact same one. straight g. i get mad props on it. might put it up on ebay or here on niketalk.
- 73,041
- 59,786
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
Originally Posted by torontoRaptor15
Wow, you have no idea what you're talking about. Seiko has some nice watches.Originally Posted by Kakashi
but fossil offers much more style than seiko no one under thirty should be caught wearing a seiko....fossilOriginally Posted by BgL2687
OP did have a $100 budget. For $100 you can't get much and seiko isn't bad for his budget. It's much better than those kenneth cole watches.Originally Posted by Kakashi
seiko?
that is all.
good night.
Seiko > Fossil and it's not even close. Fossil is a good starter watch but not something you would wear once you get some decent cash to spend on a nicer watch.
Sorry but you under-estimate Seiko way too much yet praise Fossil. Fossil isn't bad but trust me, that is in the bottom of the totem pole when it comes towatches. Seiko is only looked down upon in the U.S. but in Japan (research Grand Seiko) and you have people preferring Seikos over Rolexs. Seiko has beenmaking clocks and watches for over a century now. Fossil uses the cheapest possible movements and there is a reason you can buy $30 Fossils at their outletstores. Most of their movements are quartz made with cheap materials, I've owned 3 Fossils in my life and all of the watch cases peeled and rusted within ayear of wear. Plus come on, Fossil has become a brand than a watch maker and started selling clothes and shoes in the past few years, it's hard to takethem seriously and it is the same reason Tag Heuer is losing some respect because they keep making other items like a celphone or sunglasses or blue tooth techbut then again they just released a new innovative movement to be utilized, but I digress.
Seiko in the U.S. isn't bad at all. They have the spring drive movement, which is pretty good as it is deemed very accurate and saves more power having alonger power reserve than the usual automatic. Outside of the U.S. and in the watch community, Seiko is very well respected while Fossil is trashed along withMovado (yeah I said it). Seiko is far superior than Fossil, Fossil just appeals to the younger crowd because they tend to rip-off designs from every otherwatch company. Check out Burberry watch that looks like a Rolex or a Michael Kors watch that looks like a Pam, all made by Fossil.
I'll take these $340-$400 Seikos over any watch Movado or Fossil makes.
