- 2,182
- 80
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2009
i'm a fan of both versions
Gudda Gudda & Lil Wayne - Dont Like The Look Of It (Willy Wonka)
- Thread in 'Music' Thread starter Started by jupiterjaywall,
- Start date
- 516
- 41
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2005
waynes verse is fire
shoeking2101
Banned
- 19,736
- 2,456
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2007
smh this song is flames, tune goes in....
- 20,261
- 2,188
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2006
- 3,454
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2008
i liked gudda gudda and waynes verse......
some of yall just be hating and doubting stuff for no reason.
some of yall just be hating and doubting stuff for no reason.
- 4,339
- 266
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2002
Chalk me up as one who's a fan of both versions as well.
Bit off the Backwudz? You do know both songs sample the song right? How can someone bite you when you bit someone?
Yeai'm reading this thread how dudes talking like the Backwudz version isclassic lol. Them dudes didn't go in. That beat went hard. They kept upwith the beat. But cats acting like Da Backwudz version is some classic@+! that can't be touched.Originally Posted by RavageBX
Not messin with the Backwudz joint at all
im not you
Banned
- 7,863
- 11
- Joined
- May 29, 2009
This is wack but on another note Welcome To Guddaville was pretty like the HARDEST $%** to come from that entire Young Money camp...EVER.
- 2,172
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
- 12,103
- 12
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
you must forget that just because the beat was nice that the SONG was great as well. Just because things don't drop illmatic/food and liquor type bars doesn't mean the end result of the meshing of witty lyrics and ridiculous production is better. This song isn't touching the Backwudz version because it lacks that true southern soul...they went in on the rhymes but the beat sounds like they wanted to make it the same as the backwudz one but not...you can clearly hear that...and the end result isOriginally Posted by rocyaice
Chalk me up as one who's a fan of both versions as well.
Bit off the Backwudz? You do know both songs sample the song right? How can someone bite you when you bit someone?
Yeai'm reading this thread how dudes talking like the Backwudz version isclassic lol. Them dudes didn't go in. That beat went hard. They kept upwith the beat. But cats acting like Da Backwudz version is some classic@+! that can't be touched.Originally Posted by RavageBX
Not messin with the Backwudz joint at all
- 2,172
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
Think about it this way, Da Backwudz constructed their version for an ALBUM.Originally Posted by OptimusPrimeAPhiA
you must forget that just because the beat was nice that the SONG was great as well. Just because things don't drop illmatic/food and liquor type bars doesn't mean the end result of the meshing of witty lyrics and ridiculous production is better. This song isn't touching the Backwudz version because it lacks that true southern soul...they went in on the rhymes but the beat sounds like they wanted to make it the same as the backwudz one but not...you can clearly hear that...and the end result isOriginally Posted by rocyaice
Chalk me up as one who's a fan of both versions as well.
Bit off the Backwudz? You do know both songs sample the song right? How can someone bite you when you bit someone?
Yeai'm reading this thread how dudes talking like the Backwudz version isclassic lol. Them dudes didn't go in. That beat went hard. They kept upwith the beat. But cats acting like Da Backwudz version is some classic@+! that can't be touched.Originally Posted by RavageBX
Not messin with the Backwudz joint at all...Da Backwudz just had a better flowing song...sometimes less is more.
This version is a freestyle for a mixtape.
Backwudz needed their record to be hot and well done because it was a single for their album, Wayne/Gudda just spitting bars.
Like Meek, he was just spitting bars, and all versions are dope, but I appreciate Wayne/Gudda/Meeks because they are actually spitting not just constructing a song.
windycity7
Banned
- 2,791
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
Originally Posted by rocyaice
Chalk me up as one who's a fan of both versions as well.
Bit off the Backwudz? You do know both songs sample the song right? How can someone bite you when you bit someone?
Yeai'm reading this thread how dudes talking like the Backwudz version isclassic lol. Them dudes didn't go in. That beat went hard. They kept upwith the beat. But cats acting like Da Backwudz version is some classic@+! that can't be touched.Originally Posted by RavageBX
Not messin with the Backwudz joint at all
thank you sir
black jesus
Banned
- 1,798
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
please Curren$y - Life at 30,000 ft ......and the Young Money Dedication >>>>>>>>>>>>
- 1,133
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2003
::
I just wanna say the Da Backwudz album has some nice tracks for anybody wondering,
seems like nobody even bothered to check it out to see if it was hot or wack
::
I just wanna say the Da Backwudz album has some nice tracks for anybody wondering,
seems like nobody even bothered to check it out to see if it was hot or wack
::
- 2,172
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
We excluding Waynes tapes?
cause its obvious Dedication 2 is the hardest thing to come from YM. ever.
devildog1776
Banned
- 4,952
- 139
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2008
song is trash...
black jesus
Banned
- 1,798
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
yea i was assuming wayne tapes were left out
im not you
Banned
- 7,863
- 11
- Joined
- May 29, 2009
I said the Hardest. Meaning $!$* to make your 12's jump. Currensy ain't really the type of artist to make that type of music. Damn near every song on that Guddaville tape goes hard in the whip.
- 2,172
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
Yeah Gudda did have some crazy production on that tape.
Cant wait for Back 2 Guddaville.
black jesus
Banned
- 1,798
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- 925
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2009
"I used to be ballin', now I'm Bill Gaten'"
- 12,103
- 12
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
whats your point? So they're justified for releasing a poorly crafted song? Not my problem, even though they had some fire lines.Originally Posted by jupiterjaywall
Think about it this way, Da Backwudz constructed their version for an ALBUM.Originally Posted by OptimusPrimeAPhiA
you must forget that just because the beat was nice that the SONG was great as well. Just because things don't drop illmatic/food and liquor type bars doesn't mean the end result of the meshing of witty lyrics and ridiculous production is better. This song isn't touching the Backwudz version because it lacks that true southern soul...they went in on the rhymes but the beat sounds like they wanted to make it the same as the backwudz one but not...you can clearly hear that...and the end result isOriginally Posted by rocyaice
Chalk me up as one who's a fan of both versions as well.
Bit off the Backwudz? You do know both songs sample the song right? How can someone bite you when you bit someone?
Yeai'm reading this thread how dudes talking like the Backwudz version isclassic lol. Them dudes didn't go in. That beat went hard. They kept upwith the beat. But cats acting like Da Backwudz version is some classic@+! that can't be touched.Originally Posted by RavageBX
Not messin with the Backwudz joint at all...Da Backwudz just had a better flowing song...sometimes less is more.
This version is a freestyle for a mixtape.
Backwudz needed their record to be hot and well done because it was a single for their album, Wayne/Gudda just spitting bars.
Like Meek, he was just spitting bars, and all versions are dope, but I appreciate Wayne/Gudda/Meeks because they are actually spitting not just constructing a song.
Good music is good music. Get off your high horse. You clearly don't understand the vibe that crafted songs create. Like I said. The Backwudz > This
- 2,172
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
Shut the @+*% up $++*#.Originally Posted by OptimusPrimeAPhiA
whats your point? So they're justified for releasing a poorly crafted song? Not my problem, even though they had some fire lines.Originally Posted by jupiterjaywall
Think about it this way, Da Backwudz constructed their version for an ALBUM.Originally Posted by OptimusPrimeAPhiA
you must forget that just because the beat was nice that the SONG was great as well. Just because things don't drop illmatic/food and liquor type bars doesn't mean the end result of the meshing of witty lyrics and ridiculous production is better. This song isn't touching the Backwudz version because it lacks that true southern soul...they went in on the rhymes but the beat sounds like they wanted to make it the same as the backwudz one but not...you can clearly hear that...and the end result isOriginally Posted by rocyaice
Chalk me up as one who's a fan of both versions as well.
Bit off the Backwudz? You do know both songs sample the song right? How can someone bite you when you bit someone?
Yeai'm reading this thread how dudes talking like the Backwudz version isclassic lol. Them dudes didn't go in. That beat went hard. They kept upwith the beat. But cats acting like Da Backwudz version is some classic@+! that can't be touched.Originally Posted by RavageBX
Not messin with the Backwudz joint at all...Da Backwudz just had a better flowing song...sometimes less is more.
This version is a freestyle for a mixtape.
Backwudz needed their record to be hot and well done because it was a single for their album, Wayne/Gudda just spitting bars.
Like Meek, he was just spitting bars, and all versions are dope, but I appreciate Wayne/Gudda/Meeks because they are actually spitting not just constructing a song.
Good music is good music. Get off your high horse. You clearly don't understand the vibe that crafted songs create. Like I said. The Backwudz > This
Neither songs were poorly crafted, one is a FREESTYLE, while the other is SINGLE FOR AN ALBUM.
Therefore the artist attacked the songs differently.
The Backwudz version isnt even as dope as you making it to be.
It was just the first song to use this beat/sample.
Meeks version is better than The Backwudz, and so is Gudda and Waynes.
windycity7
Banned
- 2,791
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
Originally Posted by jupiterjaywall
Shut the @+*% up $++*#.Originally Posted by OptimusPrimeAPhiA
whats your point? So they're justified for releasing a poorly crafted song? Not my problem, even though they had some fire lines.Originally Posted by jupiterjaywall
Think about it this way, Da Backwudz constructed their version for an ALBUM.Originally Posted by OptimusPrimeAPhiA
you must forget that just because the beat was nice that the SONG was great as well. Just because things don't drop illmatic/food and liquor type bars doesn't mean the end result of the meshing of witty lyrics and ridiculous production is better. This song isn't touching the Backwudz version because it lacks that true southern soul...they went in on the rhymes but the beat sounds like they wanted to make it the same as the backwudz one but not...you can clearly hear that...and the end result isOriginally Posted by rocyaice
Chalk me up as one who's a fan of both versions as well.
Bit off the Backwudz? You do know both songs sample the song right? How can someone bite you when you bit someone?
Yeai'm reading this thread how dudes talking like the Backwudz version isclassic lol. Them dudes didn't go in. That beat went hard. They kept upwith the beat. But cats acting like Da Backwudz version is some classic@+! that can't be touched.Originally Posted by RavageBX
Not messin with the Backwudz joint at all...Da Backwudz just had a better flowing song...sometimes less is more.
This version is a freestyle for a mixtape.
Backwudz needed their record to be hot and well done because it was a single for their album, Wayne/Gudda just spitting bars.
Like Meek, he was just spitting bars, and all versions are dope, but I appreciate Wayne/Gudda/Meeks because they are actually spitting not just constructing a song.
Good music is good music. Get off your high horse. You clearly don't understand the vibe that crafted songs create. Like I said. The Backwudz > This
Neither songs were poorly crafted, one is a FREESTYLE, while the other is SINGLE FOR AN ALBUM.
Therefore the artist attacked the songs differently.
The Backwudz version isnt even as dope as you making it to be.
It was just the first song to use this beat/sample.
Meeks version is better than The Backwudz, and so is Gudda and Waynes.
^ couldnt have said it any better
- 12,103
- 12
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
Originally Posted by jupiterjaywall
Shut the @+*% up $++*#.Originally Posted by OptimusPrimeAPhiA
whats your point? So they're justified for releasing a poorly crafted song? Not my problem, even though they had some fire lines.Originally Posted by jupiterjaywall
Think about it this way, Da Backwudz constructed their version for an ALBUM.Originally Posted by OptimusPrimeAPhiA
you must forget that just because the beat was nice that the SONG was great as well. Just because things don't drop illmatic/food and liquor type bars doesn't mean the end result of the meshing of witty lyrics and ridiculous production is better. This song isn't touching the Backwudz version because it lacks that true southern soul...they went in on the rhymes but the beat sounds like they wanted to make it the same as the backwudz one but not...you can clearly hear that...and the end result isOriginally Posted by rocyaice
Chalk me up as one who's a fan of both versions as well.
Bit off the Backwudz? You do know both songs sample the song right? How can someone bite you when you bit someone?
Yeai'm reading this thread how dudes talking like the Backwudz version isclassic lol. Them dudes didn't go in. That beat went hard. They kept upwith the beat. But cats acting like Da Backwudz version is some classic@+! that can't be touched.Originally Posted by RavageBX
Not messin with the Backwudz joint at all...Da Backwudz just had a better flowing song...sometimes less is more.
This version is a freestyle for a mixtape.
Backwudz needed their record to be hot and well done because it was a single for their album, Wayne/Gudda just spitting bars.
Like Meek, he was just spitting bars, and all versions are dope, but I appreciate Wayne/Gudda/Meeks because they are actually spitting not just constructing a song.
Good music is good music. Get off your high horse. You clearly don't understand the vibe that crafted songs create. Like I said. The Backwudz > This
Neither songs were poorly crafted, one is a FREESTYLE, while the other is SINGLE FOR AN ALBUM.
Therefore the artist attacked the songs differently.
The Backwudz version isnt even as dope as you making it to be.
It was just the first song to use this beat/sample.
Meeks version is better than The Backwudz, and so is Gudda and Waynes.
the BEAT is better and the SONG is better crafted. Just because its a mixtape doens't mean it has to be wack. Sometimes less is more. I'd ride to the backwudz version before this one. It just is so much cleaner.
Who cares what their intention was. THe end result is what matters. You're getting mad over here slamming on your keyboard...
- 2,172
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
OptimusPrimeAPhiA wrote:
Originally Posted by jupiterjaywall
Shut the @+*% up $++*#.Originally Posted by OptimusPrimeAPhiA
whats your point? So they're justified for releasing a poorly crafted song? Not my problem, even though they had some fire lines.Originally Posted by jupiterjaywall
Think about it this way, Da Backwudz constructed their version for an ALBUM.Originally Posted by OptimusPrimeAPhiA
you must forget that just because the beat was nice that the SONG was great as well. Just because things don't drop illmatic/food and liquor type bars doesn't mean the end result of the meshing of witty lyrics and ridiculous production is better. This song isn't touching the Backwudz version because it lacks that true southern soul...they went in on the rhymes but the beat sounds like they wanted to make it the same as the backwudz one but not...you can clearly hear that...and the end result isOriginally Posted by rocyaice
Chalk me up as one who's a fan of both versions as well.
Bit off the Backwudz? You do know both songs sample the song right? How can someone bite you when you bit someone?
Yea i'm reading this thread how dudes talking like the Backwudz version is classic lol. Them dudes didn't go in. That beat went hard. They kept up with the beat. But cats acting like Da Backwudz version is some classic @+! that can't be touched.Originally Posted by RavageBX
Not messin with the Backwudz joint at all...Da Backwudz just had a better flowing song...sometimes less is more.
This version is a freestyle for a mixtape.
Backwudz needed their record to be hot and well done because it was a single for their album, Wayne/Gudda just spitting bars.
Like Meek, he was just spitting bars, and all versions are dope, but I appreciate Wayne/Gudda/Meeks because they are actually spitting not just constructing a song.
Good music is good music. Get off your high horse. You clearly don't understand the vibe that crafted songs create. Like I said. The Backwudz > This
Neither songs were poorly crafted, one is a FREESTYLE, while the other is SINGLE FOR AN ALBUM.
Therefore the artist attacked the songs differently.
The Backwudz version isnt even as dope as you making it to be.
It was just the first song to use this beat/sample.
Meeks version is better than The Backwudz, and so is Gudda and Waynes.
the BEAT is better and the SONG is better crafted. Just because its a mixtape doens't mean it has to be wack. Sometimes less is more. I'd ride to the backwudz version before this one. It just is so much cleaner.
Who cares what their intention was. THe end result is what matters. You're getting mad over here slamming on your keyboard...
How you gone say the beat is better, when its the same thing, but the Gudda version is just faster..
And the song is better crafted because they had to put a hook and +$*+ on it for a album @%%$%.
gudda and wayne just went and freestyled to it for a song on a mixtape.
neither version is wack, just completely different in a sense, and the ym version is better imo.
