If "NIKE" was ok on the back of retro 2's, Why not

it is just shoes

 

​

 

EDIT: I realized my post wasn't contributing to the topic after reading the 1st page.

But dang, they killed the Jordan IIs. No Nike on those DB IIs but a small Jordan sign.

GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS

Azubuike - Barnes - Belinelli - Biedrins - Croshere - Davis - Ellis

Harrington - Hudson - Jackson - Lasme - O'Bryant - Perovic - Pietrus - Wright​

 

the stupid argument i hear is, "it's like a company paying itself."

i work for a very large company. when our marketing department comes up with a new logo or new ad campaign, any of the other departments or retail products that use it have to pay for it.

tmarketing gets a share of every product sold as part of our branded products.

ultimately that money goes back to greater company, yes, but they get their share.

so, yes, the company pays itself constantly.


dan

LIVESTRONG

 

IMO its all about aesthetics. the back tab was design specifically on the III and IV to have the "Nike Air" logo on it. it fills the whole space and looks sooo much more pleasing than the jumpman with all that empty space left.

 

Hopefully they keep the swoosh on future retro 1's!!!

 

N-A on back is no longer on Brand Jordan's mind.

TeamClippers
GET WELL EB42/SL14

AL THORNTON FOR ROY

SC TROJANS
MAYO-GIBSON-JEFFERSON​

 

^^they will, only because they wouldn't sell without it.

they dont have that problem with 3-6

"2002/2003 - The Last Year Brand Jordan actually used "real leather" on their products."-BabyJordan0312​

Team Disgruntled​