if Nike were to switch back to OG swoosh emblem

[nosleep4jordans]

would the shoes made with the the jordan sign over the A I R on back of nowadays older retros, is it possible these shoes would be worth more money 5-10 yearsdown the road cause they will discontinue them?

 

[k r e a m]

oh nah i get you i think they would decrease in value cause the high demand for the nike air logo on the back but i really doubt thatll happen.....

 

[tylerhundley]

 

[burns1923]

Don't think so.

Can't imagine people valuing Jumpman Air so much that it inflates the value.

 

[dunksnjordans1992]

i dont understand anything you wrote..

 

[wrod7]

Then the OG's will loss value also, I think it is better different then the same.

 

[mike2389]

i dont think so...

 

[frenchblue23]

Why does it matter to people if it has a nike or jumpman?

Originals will always be worth more than the retro counterpart.

 

[je15306]

probably not

 

[minneapolisxsneakers]

Since Jordan became a subdivision of Nike i doubt they'll put the nike air back on them anyway

 

[DownByLaw]

Originally Posted by FrenchBlue23

Why does it matter to people if it has a nike or jumpman?

Because when Money played the shoe didn't have a jumpman over the AIR.

 

[raygotsjays]

to many threads on this subject sorry man jordan and the jumpman has a bigger impact on the shoes now, it would never happen

 

[shoeefreakk]

probablyy nottt....

 

[nosleep4jordans]

all this makes since.. there's really nothing to miss about the jumpman on the back, we only miss the emblem because thats what MJ wore and its orginal. iget it

 

[blue23jordan]

Isn't there a new thread about this every week?

 

[ogmx23]

Only a newb would make a thread like this


Belive me homebro we will never see the swoosh if they to do that you can say that's pretty much a desperation move by JB

smMFh

 

[k r e a m]

Originally Posted by blue23jordan

Isn't there a new thread about this every week?

what atleast you know

 

[ogmx23]

^^^

RETROS WILL NEVER BE MORE THAN NIKE AIR


NOT IN 5 YEARS NOT IN 20 YEARS I'd ONLY SAY SIG JORDANS WOULD COST MORE YEARS FROM NOW AND I MEAN YEARS FROM NOW LIKE WHEN I'm 40 YEARS OLD LMAO

 

[smcrock14]

i dont understand anything you wrote..

For Real

 

[luvtheshoe]

I prefer the jumpman, but I wouldn't pay more/less.

 

[frenchblue23]

Originally Posted by FIRST B0RN

Originally Posted by FrenchBlue23

Why does it matter to people if it has a nike or jumpman?

Because when Money played the shoe didn't have a jumpman over the AIR.

True, but Money is all about his money now, and wants to showcase that Jumpman because it's his.

 

[roll 22]

Originally Posted by FrenchBlue23

Why does it matter to people if it has a nike or jumpman?

Originals will always be worth more than the retro counterpart.

Right on!

 

[dankenstien88]

Doubt it.

 

[SteveSteve72]

 

[jcool813]

Originally Posted by blue23jordan

Isn't there a new thread about this every week?

honestly it has slowed down alot