- 75
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2009
DONT KNOW!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Nope...and I think it's gonna come down between him an John Lynch. Honestly, I think John Lynch is the more deserving of the two. Also (I dunno how much it matters in the eyes of the voters), he was busted for using HGH when he was with the Pats.
Originally Posted by Statis22
If Michael Irvin got in then why not
Originally Posted by dreClark
he was never the clear cut best at his position for an extended period of time.
Originally Posted by KingHawthorne95
Out of the era he played in him, lynch and dawkins were the top of their position, and i think dawkins is slightly better than both, but to each its own.