rainking
Supporter
- 8,031
- 17,327
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
Totally true but there may as well be zero for these because it’s all crap LOL
Jordan 11 Low Snakeskin - April 19th 2019
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by jordanhead718212,
- Start date
- 1,486
- 4,048
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2016
Last edited:
- 2,438
- 1,488
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2015
light bone is dope, as soon as the price drops a little bit i'll need to double up, it's so white i think the second i take it outside it'll turn dirt brown.
wish i found a pair of pink skin in women size 12.5 somewhere....
wish i found a pair of pink skin in women size 12.5 somewhere....
- 1,486
- 4,048
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2016
- 93,960
- 32,986
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
bones are sick
- 15,997
- 43,335
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2017
Yeah those were the only ones I really wanted. Hopefully they sit and can be had on discount. Think it's time to go back to my old ways and only buy stuff that's on sale for a decent price.
- 16,550
- 21,917
- Joined
- May 2, 2010
Bones would be so crazy in a hi top
- 1,486
- 4,048
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2016
- 66,633
- 77,340
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
Yuck at the gear. The snake print shorts...Jordan clothes be wild tacky
rainking
Supporter
- 8,031
- 17,327
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
I could never pull off those pinks. Maybe if the sockliner was black or even white ... then maybe. Now, if they did a red snakeskin pair, with various shades of red ... 
- 5,123
- 7,039
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2018
Of the 3 snakes the blues look the best imo just because the pattern is uniform.
- 1,486
- 4,048
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2016
Definitely Copping Another Pair!!!
ASAP!!! Look Too Good Can't Wait!!!
JRaW’d
formerly jrodski
- 7,343
- 8,429
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2010
How many actual snakes have you seen with a “uniform” pattern tho?
- 36,573
- 48,786
- Joined
- May 12, 2008
- 5,123
- 7,039
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2018
rainking
Supporter
- 8,031
- 17,327
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
Saw the bones at the mall today. I saw what some said earlier about the snake material being different than the navy. Interesting, and I wonder why they did it that way between different colorways. That said, they didn't do much for me, not sure why. I think I don't like the sail color in general, on most shoes.
The shorts would be dope if they weren't made out of a plastic tablecloth. Especially the navy pair. If those were made out of a decent knit material like most of Nike's shorts these days, I'd have probably bought two pairs of them. Also if they just had a Jumpman embroidered on them rather than the big 11-style font of "JORDAN" so big on them. But I could have lived with that if the actual material was nice. Instead, I can't see how anyone can wear them as is. They don't even have any kind of liner. Imagine sweating in those things on a hot day. Zero breathability and zero moisture-absorption properties. Nasty.
- 33,401
- 39,115
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
Which way is better?
rainking
Supporter
- 8,031
- 17,327
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
Yo. Good question. I was trying to come to a conclusion on that, actually. My knee-jerk reaction was, the bones/pinks (I think pinks are the same) seem like better quality. Only because they don't appear to have the suede-like overlay on the base layer to produce the scale effect. They actually seem to have little raised "scales" on them compared to the Navys. But then after I thought about it, I'm not sure. They feel somewhat more plasticky as a result. Honestly I'd have to have them side by side. Or really, see how each construction/material does over time. But from what I saw briefly, I lean to them being better. Too bad I don't like those colorways LOL
EDIT:
spoonmanofthehour
additional note for you: Now that I think about it, it might be a result of the type of pattern they were trying to achieve. The Navy's are an attempt to mimic, somewhat, the OG Navys. The pinks and bones are more a digi-camo pattern printed on them, with some raised scales for the snake effect. Two different things. The suede overlay on the navy's adds a third shade of blue, somewhat like the OGs. I'm guessing but I think that's what's behind it.
Last edited:
- 33,401
- 39,115
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
Ok, thanks. The Bone's and Pink's do look better to me in pics and videos, but I will have to see in person. I've just been to lazy to go to the sneaker shops. Bone's will be copped on discount tho.
rainking
Supporter
- 8,031
- 17,327
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
Check my above edit if you didn't see it. Either way, I love the navys. Wish they were a true OG retro, but they still just look great on their own, especially when you're wearing them. Even my girl said last week, "those are my favorites of all of those," meaning all the 11s. Such a great, versatile, non-loud colorway. I've been wearing them quite a bit. They're my go-to shoe right now whenever possible.
- 2,634
- 2,300
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2014
Yeah I don’t like the sail color on the leather upper part as well. Thought it’d be lighter color in hand.
What size do I get for them pink joints if I’m a 10.5us on usual jordan 11s?
What size do I get for them pink joints if I’m a 10.5us on usual jordan 11s?
rainking
Supporter
- 8,031
- 17,327
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
I buy all current 11s, mid or low, in my TTS 11 and have zero problems. Best I can tell you.
- 3,007
- 10,980
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2017
Women’s 12.
Women’s size are always 1.5 up from men and youth.
- 33,401
- 39,115
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
You keep talking about the Navy's and you'll have me copping those instead of Bone's. Maybe I'll end up with three pairs.
