Kind of a stupid question.

[jeenewed]

Would "Yes they're" be correct grammar? Instead of "Yes they are"

 

[daproblem53]

imo i would say it is correct grammar

 

[ortega03]

How are you using the phrase?

 

[jpzx]

"Yes they're" is the same as, "Yes they are"

 

[jumpshot]

it is indeed correct grammar wise, but the problem is the pronunciation of "they're". In that scenario, such pronunciation just doesn't soundright.

 

[nktran001]

Originally Posted by JPZx

"Yes they're" is the same as, "Yes they are"

 

[kaycurrency]

how about "No they'ren't"...?

 

[jayhood23]

Originally Posted by KayCurrency

how about "No they'ren't"...?

a double contraction

 

[jigsta05]

Is it...

They aren't

or

They're not

 

[jpzx]

Originally Posted by jigsta05

Is it...

They aren't

or

They're not

 

[wanksta23]

you guys need to remeber the 're is like an "are"

they ARE not

just depends how you use it

 

[vsano]

Very correct though it sounds awkward...

 

[cucumbercool]

Originally Posted by Jumpshot

it is indeed correct grammar wise, but the problem is the pronunciation of "they're". In that scenario, such pronunciation just doesn't sound right.

Correct. Take into account the sound of the sentence. If it doesn't sound right then use the two words.

 

[angeleelee]

lol are those twins?
- They're