LC/PC: 2000 Space Jams **URGENT**

Discussion in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' started by blaz3n, Dec 20, 2009.

  1. blaz3n

    blaz3n

    6,588
    1,180
    Joined
    Dec 8, 2008
    Are these 100% authentic, how much would you pay for them?

    Seller claims "only tried on"

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Thank you
     
  2. hotbutter

    hotbutter

    1,511
    32
    Joined
    Dec 17, 2007
    shoes look good to me. but they definitely DO NOT look like they were only "tried on" lol at least worn 5x. imo probably $200 range.

    but me personally, i wouldnt pay more than 175
     
  3. blaz3n

    blaz3n

    6,588
    1,180
    Joined
    Dec 8, 2008
    How do they look worn to you?

    Are you judging it by the sole? the ankle where the "23" is? or..?
     
  4. sneakerfan93

    sneakerfan93

    2,527
    10
    Joined
    May 16, 2009
    Legit...225 for the price

    Excellent condition except yellowed/slightly dirty sole and very minor crease on heel. Definitely not triedon, but worn about twice or three times.
     
  5. glitch008

    glitch008

    1,989
    746
    Joined
    Mar 27, 2009
    ^Not tried on but worn? How could a worn shoe be not tried on? What do you mean?
     
  6. aphexacid

    aphexacid

    2,742
    126
    Joined
    Nov 20, 2007
    They're not just tried on, they were actually worn.
     
  7. blaz3n

    blaz3n

    6,588
    1,180
    Joined
    Dec 8, 2008
    Worn in a sense.. as if he walked around with it.

    Tried on, doesn't count as being "worn". In a sense, you can go to footlocker and try on a pair of shoes and decide you don't like them, butthe next customer might like them and buy them, and there under the impression that the shoes are 100% DS/NEW/UNWORN.
     
  8. glitch008

    glitch008

    1,989
    746
    Joined
    Mar 27, 2009
    My bad fellas, must be the lack of sleep. [​IMG]
     
  9. caliking03

    caliking03

    358
    10
    Joined
    Dec 7, 2007
    def been worn.
     
  10. me4u2night

    me4u2night

    1,809
    20
    Joined
    Dec 24, 2006
    He wore the shoes.
    From the angle of some of the pics, the insoles look like they have white cotton lint balls stuck to it that get left behind from wearing them with whitesocks.
     
  11. thefreshestwhiteboy301

    thefreshestwhiteboy301

    493
    10
    Joined
    Jun 19, 2009
    around 200 shipped and most def worn
     
  12. jstar25

    jstar25

    611
    10
    Joined
    Sep 22, 2005
    Seriously why not buy the retro? I'm not trying to be funny just wondering what the reasoning is, is it a quality issue or just to be able to say you havethe 2000 retro?
     
  13. blaz3n

    blaz3n

    6,588
    1,180
    Joined
    Dec 8, 2008
    I feel, everyone is going to have a pair of the retroes.. so why not get a 2000 pair..
     
  14. me4u2night

    me4u2night

    1,809
    20
    Joined
    Dec 24, 2006
  15. blaz3n

    blaz3n

    6,588
    1,180
    Joined
    Dec 8, 2008
    Reading is fundamental.

    He said they were already boxed, and ready to be shipped.
     
  16. subtrax

    subtrax

    484
    29
    Joined
    Jan 13, 2008
    ^ so you're the winner eh!! i wanted to pm'd the winning bidder to see how the shoes turned out... so theyre worn?? because he said "his friendONLY tried them on"
     
  17. aphexacid

    aphexacid

    2,742
    126
    Joined
    Nov 20, 2007
    The 2009's look like combat boots with nice clear soles. when you've worn them a few times, and they start to turn yellow, then finally DO turn yellow,you'll be left with a pair of sub par yellow soled air jordan combat boots.
     
  18. jstar25

    jstar25

    611
    10
    Joined
    Sep 22, 2005
    ^^ LOL man go head on with the jokes combat boots you really did make me laugh. I do understand that the yellowing is uncool but they all yellow over time. Ijust think the older the XI the more likely they will damage if you do wear them, so the money spent may really be wasted if say you try to rock them andCarbon Fiber cracks or the patent seems give way. I suppose the design is a bit different and for some that is a HUGE difference maker, because I didn'tcare so much for the retro Aqua's. Anyway I suppose I understand you guys but still don't see the "upside" to buying a 9 year old shoe thatwasn't designed to last, over a retro that you can pay less for and wear, unless your just collecting. Anyway thanks for the answers.